UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

SCHEDULE 14A

PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE


SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

Filed by the registrant  ☒Filed by a party other than the registrant     ☐

Check the appropriate box:

 

Check the appropriate box:
Preliminary Proxy Statement

Confidential, For Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e) (2))

Definitive Proxy Statement

Definitive Additional Materials

Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-12

 

Navient Corporation


(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 


(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement if Other Than the Registrant)

 

Payment of filing fee (check the appropriate box): 

Payment of filing fee (check the appropriate box):
 
No fee required.
  
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11
  
 (1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

  (2)
 

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

  (3)
 

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

  (4)
 

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

  
(5)Total fee paid:
 

Total fee paid:

  
oFee paid previously with preliminary materials.
  
oCheck box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.
 (1)Amount Previously Paid:
(2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
(3)Filing Party:
(4)Date Filed:


(image) 


(image) 
  (1)
 

Amount Previously Paid:

We are a leader in education loan management and business processing solutions for education, healthcare, and government clients at the federal, state, and local levels.
  (2) 

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

OUR VISIONOUR VALUES
  (3) 

Filing Party:

 (4)

Date Filed:

(COVER PAGE) 

OUR VISION

Navient will be the leader inWe aspire to lead every market we serve, delivering expertise andproviding solutions that anticipate and solve our customers’ unique and complex needs.

Our values reflect who we are and where we’re going. By living them daily, we stay on course toward our goals for ourselves, our customers, our communities, and our shareholders.
OUR MISSION

Our mission is

We strive to ensurebe the best.
We enhance the financial success forof our clients and their customers throughby delivering innovative solutions and insights with compassion and personalized service. Our unwavering integrity and compliance-focused mindset guide us on the path to market leadership.

 

OUR VALUES

CUSTOMER-CENTRICITY

PuttingBy relentlessly pursuing the right solutions, we deliver on our promises to each other and those we serve.

We’re stronger together.
We succeed because we’re inclusive and authentic, and we know good ideas can come from anywhere and anyone.
We earn the trust of our customers first in all we do.

LEADERSHIP

Always strivingand colleagues.

We hold each other accountable and act with integrity.
We innovate always and everywhere.
We empower each other to be the best at what we do.

INTEGRITY

Our transparent, responsible approach is a source of pride.

PROACTIVITY

Action-orientedthink di!erently, develop ourselves, and driven to get things done forgrow our customers.

STABILITY

Reliable, trustworthy, and compliance-focused.

INNOVATION

Always thinking of new and better ways to add value.

company.

 (image)


(image) 

 

(GRAPHIC) 

(NAVIENT LOGO) 

123 Justison Street
Wilmington, Delaware 19801

 

April 13, 20179, 2021

 

Dear Fellow Shareholders:

 

On behalf of the entire Board of Directors of Navient Corporation,As we are pleasedwrite this letter to invite you to our 2017 Annual Meeting. The attached Notice of 2017the 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement provides informationof Navient Corporation, the COVID-19 pandemic is still significantly impacting the world, the nation, virtually every aspect of the economy, our business and the agenda forlives of our employees and customers. We are pleased to share that our response to the meeting.

Ongoing Evolution of a Skilledpandemic at Navient continues to be rapid, impactful and Diverse Boardsolutions-driven.

 

We believetruly demonstrated our nominees forinnovative approach, the Board possess the breadthagility of experienceour systems, operations and range of relevant skills to provide effective oversight of the Company’s strategies, risks and performance. The Board has also been a leader in corporate governance. For example, each member of Navient’s Board of Directors, other than the CEO, is an independent director,people and the Board is also led by an independent chairperson. In addition, again in 2016, over halfresilience of our independent directors are women—more than any other financial services company inorganization during 2020. Perhaps the S&P 500.

Importantly, the Board continuesgreatest example of that was how we worked with our business processing clients, including federal agencies, public sector entities and health care institutions, to evolve, addingoffer relief where needed. We quickly redeployed our team and adapted our platform to help our state clients meet new skillschallenges, including processing much-needed unemployment benefits and talent aligned with Navient’s businessproviding contact-tracing and growth strategy. While one of our long-standing and most dedicated leaders, Dr. Barry Munitz, a director since 1997, will retire from the Board effective as of the Annual Meeting, we have planned for this event by continuing to recruit and add highly qualified new directors, as evidenced most recently by the addition of David Yowan. In the last three years, the Board’s focus on board composition and succession planning has led to the addition of seven new highly qualified directors.

The Board takes seriously its responsibility to sustain its leadership. With our age and tenure limits, one director is scheduled to retire in 2018 and two directors are scheduled to retire in 2020. Our Board will continue its focus on ensuring we have the skillsets necessary to effectively lead the Company in the coming years.

On behalf of the Board and our shareholders, we thank Barry for his years of dedicated service and leadership.vaccination administration services.

 

Navient’s ManagementFor the millions of student loan borrowers we serve, we swiftly implemented several unprecedented relief programs initiated by the White House and Board are Focused on BuildingCongress for the FutureU.S. Department of Education borrowers, and Generating Value for our Shareholderswe deployed options to support impacted FFELP and private credit borrowers we service. We also created a comprehensive webpage, https://Navient.com/covid-19, dedicated to providing information needed to access these programs during this crisis.

 

Additionally, in 2020, we responded to our nation’s rightful drive for social justice. We worked to strengthen Navient as an inclusive and equitable workplace and we also looked outside our own walls to find ways to create more opportunity for those in our communities who need it most. In 2016,early 2021, we executedlaunched a partnership with Boys & Girls Clubs of America— Navient’s largest-ever such partnership—with a specific emphasis on our commitment to generate value for shareholders. Highlights from the year include:helping young people in underserved communities.

 

Increased our non-education fee revenue by 77%

Acquired $3.7 billion in student loans

Reduced outstanding unsecured debt by $1.4 billion

Repurchased 17% or 60 million shares of our common stockWe delivered strong 2020 results, and in doing so returned $1 billion to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases

Earned adjusted core net income of $1.89 per share

Looking forward, while not ignoring the legal proceedings in which the Company is involved, we are working diligentlycommitted to capture the many opportunities we seecontinuing to create value for our clients, customers, communities, colleagues, and our shareholders.shareholders in 2021 and beyond.

 

Capital Profile

We have a well-defined, disciplined approach to investing the capital you have entrusted us to manage. To create the highest, sustainable return, we maintain a strong capital profile that supports our business in all economic environments. Today, our capital position is very strong. Our free cash flow, debt coverage ratios and equity ratios are all at very strong levels. Importantly, we maintained these levels while reducing our outstanding unsecured debt by $1.4 billion and returning $1 billion to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases in 2016. In doing so, our debt maturities for 2017 were lowered to $700 million, and we reduced our 2018, 2019 and 2020 debt maturities from $7.2 billion to $6.5 billion.

Our capital profile demonstrates our commitment to our clients, our bondholders, ABS investors and shareholders, and that we are built for the long-term.

Disciplined Risk Management

Our business plan is governed by risk guidelines to ensure our portfolios and businesses are managed to produce appropriate, risk-adjusted returns. Our discipline ensures we are mindful of various market challenges, including risks related to credit, interest rates, credit spreads and liquidity to name a few, to help ensure that each of our businesses will perform well through various market cycles. Our philosophy and values guide us to continually enhance how we support the success of our customers, clients, shareholders and other stakeholders.

Business Processing Solutions

Our Business Processing Solutions work applies the expertise, systems and compliance skills we have developed in student loans to the state, municipal and healthcare markets. Our clients benefit from the higher performance, lower cost, and strong compliance controls we deliver every day. Our non-education related fee businesses generated $174 million in revenue in 2016, a 77% increase from 2015. We expect this revenue growth to continue in 2017.

Asset Management and Servicing

Navient services loans for more than 12 million customers with $300 billion in outstanding balances. We bring over 40 years of experience, allowing us to help the borrowers we service successfully manage their student loans.

At Navient, we use our experience and expertise to assist our customers navigating the complex federal student loan program by helping them understand their many options so they can choose the solution that best fits their needs. The results are outstanding.

Our federal student loan customers default at a rate that is significantly lower than their peers and are less likely to be severely delinquent. Loans we service are more likely than comparable servicers to be enrolled in income-driven repayment plans. Our performance is a source of tremendous pride to our nearly 7,000-plus team members.

We deliver this industry-leading performance by using our expertise and sophisticated data analytics to better identify customers who need extra support, reach out in ways that result in higher rates of contact, and present repayment options they can select to fit their budget. We have responded to the incredible and increasing program complexity by creating teams of specialists and the means to direct customers to the appropriate team. We have also used our expertise and data to develop an award-winning financial literacy video series for our customers.

Servicers play an important role in helping borrowers successfully repay their loans. And, the overwhelming majority of borrowers are successfully repaying their student loans. Delinquency and default rates in the Direct Student Loan program have declined 18% and 27% respectively in the past two years. Nationally, fewer borrowers defaulted last year despite a 10% increase in the number of borrowers in repayment.

Legal Challenges and Public Advocacy

Despite these positive trends, servicers have been criticized or, in our case, sued by federal regulators and state attorneys general. Let us be perfectly clear: the allegations made do not correspond with the facts and the exceptional results we deliver for consumers.

The lawsuits and related public commentary ignores our clear, positive track record of performance helping borrowers. In fact, if all servicers met the same default prevention performance we deliver, 300,000 fewer defaults would occur each year. Statements that Navient does not inform borrowers of their array of repayment options are simply false, and the data shows that Navient excels at providing this kind of borrower support. In fact:

In 2016, we provided our 10 million federal student loan customers with over 170 million communications about repayment options, and fielded tens of millions of phone calls to discuss options and provide services.

Federal student loan borrowers we service are 31% less likely to default. This superior performance is even better for higher risk borrowers, such as borrowers who do not graduate.

49% of the balances we service for the government are enrolled in income-driven repayment plans, the highest among comparable servicers.

9 times out of 10, when we make contact with distressed federal loan borrowers, we help them avoid default.

From our front-line position servicing over 10 million federal student loan accounts, we witness first-hand what works and what does not. We believe we should share our insight and expertise to help policymakers improve the federal loan programs to make it easier for borrowers to succeed. Among the topics we have advocated for are:

Better tools and information to help students and their families make informed borrowing decisions to encourage degree completion and realize a return on their higher education investment

Streamlined repayment options to reduce complexity for borrowers and servicers and increase engagement

Easier methods to enroll in and recertify federal income-driven repayment programs

Programs that encourage borrowers to contact their student loan servicers

More assistance to borrowers participating in the federal rehabilitation program to help them recover from default and successfully transition to repayment

The establishment of a private loan rehabilitation program that creates a pathway for borrowers in default to get back on track and improve their credit

A one-time credit bureau retraction for student loan borrowers who have reestablished an on-time payment track record

Bankruptcy reform that allows federal and private student loans to be discharged after a good faith effort to repay

Dedicated Team

Our results would not be possible without the commitment and hard work of our team of dedicated Navient employees. We are deeply appreciative of their drive to continuously deliver extraordinary service—the driver for creating value for all our stakeholders.

Shareholder Meeting

Our 2017Navient’s 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders will take placebe held virtually on Thursday, May 25, 2017,20 at 8:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time. TheTime to protect the safety and well-being of our shareholders and employees in light of the pandemic. Read on for instructions on how to participate in the meeting.

At our Annual Meeting, we will be held at Navient’s headquarters located at 123 Justison Street, Wilmington, Delaware.consider the matters described in this proxy statement. We are again making our proxy materials available to you electronically. We hope that this continues to offer you a convenient way to review the materials while allowing us to reduce our environmental footprint and expense.

 

Attached to this letter are a Notice of 2017 Annual Meeting of ShareholdersThe proxy statement contains important information and our Proxy Statement, which describe the business to be conducted at the Annual Meeting. Weyou should read it carefully. Your vote is important, and we strongly encourage you to read this report carefully and to vote your shares. There are several ways you can vote, including online, by telephone, or by mail. Please vote at your earliest convenience by followingshares using one of the instructions includedvoting methods described in the Proxy Statement. Your vote is important. Whether you own a few shares or many, it is important that you are represented.proxy statement.

 

Today, as with every day since our creation as an independent company three years ago, Navient strives to lead in every market we serve. Our vision is to deliver expertiseWe wish you good health and solutions that anticipate and solve our customers’ unique and complex needs. We are dedicated to retaining our stakeholders’ trust and confidence. Thank you for your continued investment in Navient. We look forward to seeing you at the Annual Meeting.safety.

 

Sincerely,

 -s- John F. Remondi(image)-s- William M. Diefenderfer (image)

John (Jack) F. Remondi

Linda A. Mills
President and Chief Executive Officer

William M. Diefenderfer, III

ChairmanChair of the Board of Directors

 


 

(image)
AWARDS AND RECOGNITION
Navient is proud to receive recognition for excellence
in corporate governance and business practices.
Champion of Board Diversity
for commitment to women in leadership
Better Business Bureau Accredited
for Navient and its subsidiaries
(image)IMAGE OMITTED
“W” Company Award
for commitment to board diversity
2018 CPA-Zicklin Index “Trendsetter”
for political transparency
(image)IMAGE
Veteran Jobs Mission
for commitment to veteran hiring
Military Friendly Employer Award
for leading programs for veterans and
military spouses
(image)IMAGE
Training Top 100
for staff.learning and development programs
Best Place to Work
for a commitment to equality in the workplace
(image)IMAGE
To learn more about these and other awards as well as other ways IMAGE
we participate in our communities, please visit about.navient.com/values-and-people


 

(GRAPHIC) 

(NAVIENT LOGO) IMAGE

 

123 Justison Street
Wilmington, Delaware 19801

 

April 13, 20179, 2021

 

 

NOTICE OF 20172021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS OF
NAVIENT CORPORATION

 

To Our Shareholders:

 

Navient Corporation (“Navient” or the “Company”) will hold its 20172021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”) as follows:

 

Date:Date:Thursday, May 25, 201720, 2021

Time:
Time:8:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time

Place:Navient Corporation
123 Justison Street
Wilmington, Delaware 19801
Access:Meeting Live via the Internet
Please visit www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NAVI2021

 

Items of Business:

 

(1)Elect the 119 nominees named in the proxy statement to serve as directors for one-year terms or until their successors have been duly elected and qualified;

(2)Ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as Navient’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2017;
2021;

(3)Approve, in a non-binding advisory vote, the compensation paid to Navient’s named executive officers;

(4)Approve the Amended and Restated Navient Corporation 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan; and
(5)Act on such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the meeting.

 

Record Date:

 

You may vote if you were a shareholder of record as of the close of business on March 30, 2017.23, 2021.

In the interest of the health and well-being of our shareholders and our employees, we have determined that the 2021 Annual Meeting will be held in a virtual meeting format only, via the Internet, with no physical in-person meeting. If you plan to participate in the virtual meeting, please refer to instructions on page 6 of this proxy statement.


 

Your participation in the Annual Meeting is important. You can vote in person or by telephone, Internet or, if you request that proxy materials be mailed to you, by completing and signing the proxy card enclosed with those materials and returning it in the envelope provided. If you wish to attend and participate in the virtual meeting, in person, you must bringprovide evidence of your ownership as of March 30, 2017,23, 2021, or a valid proxy showing that you are representing a shareholder who owned shares as of that date.

 

Thank you for your interest in Navient.

 
 By Order of the Board of Directors,
  
 -s- Mark L. Heleen 
 

 IMAGE
Mark L. Heleen

Secretary

 

 

 

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be Held on May 25, 2017.20, 2021.

 

This notice and proxy statement and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20162020 (the “2016“2020 Form 10-K”) are available free of charge athttps://www.navient.com/about/investors/stockholderinfo/ andhttp://materials.proxyvote.com.

 

You may also obtain these materials at the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) website atwww.sec.gov or by contacting the Office of the Corporate Secretary, 123 Justison Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801. Navient will provide a copy of the 2016our Form 10-K without charge to any shareholder upon written request.

Except to the extent specifically referenced herein, information contained or referenced on our website is not incorporated by reference into and does not form a part of this proxy statement.

 

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

Our shareholder letter and this proxy statement contain forward-looking statements, within the meaning of the Federal securities laws, about our business and prospects. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties and are based on the beliefs and assumptions of our management based on information currently available. Use of words such as “believes,” ���expects,“expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “should,” “may,” “could,” “likely” or similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these words. Our future results may differ materially from our past results and from those projected in the forward-looking statements due to various uncertainties and risks, including, but not limited to, those described in Item 1A of Part I (Risk Factors) of our 20162020 Form 10-K.10-K . We disclaim any obligation to update any forward-looking statements contained herein after the date of this proxy statement.

 


 

Table of Contents

 

Proxy SummaryPROXY SUMMARY1
Annual Meeting of Shareholders1
Meeting Agenda Voting Matters1
Board and Governance Practices2
Board of Directors Composition3
Director Nominees4
General InformationGENERAL INFORMATION5
Overview of ProposalsQUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING6
OVERVIEW OF PROPOSALS11
ProposalPROPOSAL 1 — Election of DirectorsELECTION OF DIRECTORS12
Corporate GovernanceCORPORATE GOVERNANCE1921
Role and Responsibilities of the Board of Directors1921
Board Governance Guidelines1921
Board Leadership Structure2022
Board Succession Planning22
Management Succession Planning2022
Director Independence2123
Board of Directors Meetings and Attendance at Annual Meeting2123
Committee Membership2123
Compensation Consultant and Independence2426
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation2426
The Board of Directors’ Role in Risk Oversight2527
Risk Assessment of Compensation Policies2529
Nominations Process2629
Proxy Access30
Director Orientation and Continuing Education2730
Shareholder EngagementOur Commitment to Environment, Social and Communications with the BoardGovernance (“ESG”) Matters2731
Policy on Political Contributions, Disclosure and Oversight2832
Code of Business Conduct2832
Policy on Review and Approval of Transactions with Related Parties32
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION2833
Director Compensation29
Director Compensation Elements2933
Share Ownership Guidelines2933
Anti-Hedging and Pledging Policy3034
Policy on Rule 10b5-1 Trading Plans3034
Other Compensation3034
Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors3034

9

Director Compensation Table35
PROPOSAL 2 — RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM3137
Proposal 2 — Ratification of the Appointment of theINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM38
Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmFirms for 2020 and 20193338
Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmPre-approval Policies and Procedures3438
Report of the Audit Committee35
Ownership of Common StockREPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE36
Ownership of Common Stock by Directors and Executive Officers37

Executive Officers39
Proposal 3 — Advisory Vote on Executive CompensationOWNERSHIP OF COMMON STOCK40
Executive CompensationOWNERSHIP OF COMMON STOCK BY DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS41
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS43
PROPOSAL 3 — ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION44
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION45
Compensation and Personnel Committee Report45
Compensation Discussion and Analysis4246
Summary Compensation Table5364
Grants of Plan-Based Awards5566
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End5667
Option Exercises and Stock Vested5769
Pension Benefits5869
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation5869
Arrangements with Named Executive Officers5970
Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control71
Actual Payments Upon Termination73
CEO Pay Ratio73
OTHER MATTERS5974
Proposal 4 — Approval of the Amended and Restated Navient Corporation 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan62
Other Matters69
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions6974
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance69
Other Matters for the 20172021 Annual Meeting6974
Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports74
Shareholder Proposals for the 20182022 Annual Meeting7075
Proxy Access Procedures75
Solicitation Costs7075
Householding7075

 

10


 

Proxy Summary

 

This summary is intended as an overview of the information found elsewhere in this proxy statement. Because this is only a summary, you should read the entire proxy statement before voting.

 

Annual Meeting of Shareholders

   
DATE AND TIME:LOCATION:RECORD DATE:
May 25, 201720, 2021Navient CorporationVirtual Meeting OnlyMarch 30, 201723, 2021
8:00 a.m. local time123 Justison StreetLive via the Internet 
 Wilmington, Delaware 19801Please Visit www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NAVI2021
 

 

Meeting Agenda Voting Matters

 

This year, there are fourthree Company-sponsored proposals on the agenda.

 

Election of a director nominee pursuant to Proposal 1 will require the vote of a majority of the votes cast with respect to that director nominee’s election, meaning that the number of votes cast for such director nominee’s election must exceed the number of votes cast against that nominee’s election (with abstentions and broker non-votes not counted as votes cast either for or against the nominee’s election).

Approval of Proposals 2 3 and 43 at the Annual Meeting will require an affirmative vote of at least a majority of the votes present, represented and entitled to be voted on the matter, and voting affirmatively or negatively.

 

ProposalsBoard Voting RecommendationsPageProposalsBoard Voting RecommendationsPage
    
1.Election of each director nomineeFOR EACH NOMINEE12Election of each director nomineeFOR EACH NOMINEE12
     
2.Ratification of the appointment of KPMG as Navient’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2017FOR33Ratification of the appointment of KPMG as Navient’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2021FOR37
     
3.Non-binding advisory shareholder vote to approve the compensation paid to our named executive officersFOR40Non-binding advisory shareholder vote to approve the compensation paid to our named executive officersFOR44
   
4.Approve several amendments to the Navient Corporation 2014 Omnibus Incentive PlanFOR62

 

(GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)20172021 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC) 1

 

11


 

Board and Governance Practices

 

Corporate Governance Highlights

We believe our corporate governance policies reflect best practices.

In addition to executive compensation practices that strongly link pay and performance, Navient’s Code of Business Conduct and Board of Directors governance policies help to ensure that we meet high standards of ethical behavior, corporate governance and business conduct. The following chart highlights key Board information and governance practices in place on December 31, 2016.2020.

 

Separate Chairman and CEOGovernance OversightYes
Average Age

   Independent Chair

    Eight Independent Directors (out of Directors

62.5
Numbernine)

    All Board Committees (other than the Executive Committee) are comprised solely of Independent Directors

10

    Proxy Access

    Regular executive sessions of Independent Directors

    Majority voting for Directors (uncontested elections)

Board Effectiveness

    Strong commitment to Board diversity of perspective, gender, race and ethnicity

    Robust risk oversight framework to assess and oversee risks

Annual Elections of Directors

Yes
Majority VotingElection for DirectorsYes
all Board Meetings Held in 2016 (average director attendance 94%)8
members

Annual Self-Evaluation of the Board and Eacheach Committee

Yes

    Active Board and Management Succession Planning

Annual Equity Grant to DirectorsYes
Director Stock Ownership GuidelinesYes
Independent Directors Meet without Management PresentYes
Mandatory Retirement Age for DirectorsYes
Tenure Limit for DirectorsYes
Board Orientation and Continuing Education ProgramYes
Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging PolicyYes
Code of Business Conduct for Directors and OfficersYes
Compensation Recovery/Clawback PolicyYes
Annual Advisory Approval of Executive Compensation Oversight97.7%
Independent Compensation ConsultantYes

Double-Trigger Change in Control

Yes
Active Management Succession

    Long-Term Incentive Metrics Designed to Promote Growth and Planning

Yes
Sustainable Profitability

    Pay-for-Performance Philosophy Emphasizes “At Risk” Pay and Equity-Based Incentives

    Enhanced Compensation Recovery/Clawback Policy

    No Excessive Perquisites

    Multi-year Vesting Periods for Equity Awards

    No Tax Gross-Ups Upon Change-in-Control

    Anti-Hedging and Pledging Policy

    No Executive Employment Agreements

Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines

Yes
No Employment Agreements for ExecutivesYes
No Excessive PerquisitesYes
No Above-Market Earnings on Deferred CompensationYes

 

For more information about our governance programs and our Board of Directors, see Proposal 1 beginning on page 12.

(GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)20172021 Proxy Statement (GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)2

 

12


 

Board of Directors Composition

The composition of our Board reflects a breadth and variety of skills, business experiences and backgrounds.

The composition of our Board reflects the great wealth of experience and skills of our directors. The following table highlights each director’s specific skills, knowledge and experiences that he or she brings to the Board. A particular director may possess additional skills, knowledge or experience even though they are not indicated below.

 

The composition of our Board reflects a breadthFrederick
Arnold
Anna
Escobedo
Cabral
Larry A.
Klane
Katherine A.
Lehman
Linda A.
Mills
John (Jack) F.
Remondi
Jane J.
Thompson
Laura S.
Unger
David L.
Yowan
Skills and variety of skills, business experiences and backgrounds.Experience

The composition of our Board reflects the great wealth of experience and skills of our directors. The following table highlights each director’s specific skills, knowledge and experiences that he or she brings to the Board. A particular director may possess additional skills, knowledge or experience even though they are not indicated below.

 (GRAPHIC)

         
NameExecutive LeadershipIndustryBoard of Directors ExperienceBusiness OperationsFinance and AccountingFinancially Literate(1)Audit Financial Expert(2)Banking and Capital MarketsMergers and AcquisitionsRegulatory, Policy or LegalPublic Company Board or Corporate GovernanceAcademic and Research
John K. Adams, Jr.XXXXXXXX
Anna Escobedo CabralXXXXXX
William M.Diefenderfer, IIIXXXXXXX
Diane Suitt GillelandXXXXXX
Katherine A. LehmanXXXXXXXX
Linda A. MillsXXXXXXXXXX
Barry A. Munitz(3)XXXXXXXX
John (Jack) F.RemondiXXXXXXXXXX
Jane J. ThompsonXXIndustry Experience (1)X XXXXX
Laura S. UngerXXXXX
Barry L. WilliamsXXXXXX XXX X
David L. Yowan(4)Executive LeadershipXXXXXXXXX
Business OperationsXXXXXXXX
Finance/Capital AllocationXXXXXXXX
Financially Literate (2)XXXXXXXXX
Audit Committee Financial Expert (3)XXXXX  X
Regulatory/Policy/LegalXXXXXXX
Mergers/AcquisitionsXXXXXXXX
Higher EducationXXXX
Human Capital Management/CompensationXXXXXXXX
Corporate GovernanceXXXXXXXXX
Technology/SystemsXXX

 

(1)(1)Directors with professional experience in the financial services, consumer lending or business processing services industries.

(2)Directors who are able to read and understand financial statements.

(2)(3)Directors determined by the Board to be audit committee financial experts, as that term is defined under rules promulgated by the SEC.

Board Diversity(3)Age of Director NomineesMr. Munitz is not eligible to stand for re-election because he has reached the mandatory retirement age under our Board’s Governance Guidelines.Tenure of Director Nominees

(4)Mr. Yowan was appointed to the Board on March 30, 2017.

 

OurFor more information about our governance programs and our Board is diverse in terms of gender, age, and tenure. In fact, we were recently cited by a leading provider of board intelligence solutions as the board with the highest percentage of women directors among S&P 500 companies. Following our 2017 Annual Meeting, if each of the Board nominees is elected, our board will be comprised of 55% women directors. The average age of our directors is currently 62.5 years old. The following charts also reflect the gender and age diversity of our directorsDirectors, see Proposal 1 beginning on the date of the 2017 Annual Meeting, as well as the tenure distribution. Our tenure distribution largely reflects the addition of seven new directors since 2014.

(BAR CHART) page 12.

 

*(GRAPHIC)For purposes of this chart, we have counted each director’s service with SLM Corporation and its predecessors (other than the Student Loan Marketing Association).

(GRAPHIC)20172021 Proxy Statement (GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)3

 

13


 

Our Director Nominees

 

  Committee MembershipsOther
 Director     Public Director Standing
Committee Memberships(2)
Other
Public
NameAge(1)Since(2)Occupation and ExperienceIndependentECACCCNGC(3)FOCBoardsAge(1)SinceOccupation and ExperienceIndependentECACCCNGCRCBoards
John K. Adams, Jr.612014Retired – Investment BankingYesM C1
Frederick Arnold672018Financial ExecutiveYes M M1
Anna Escobedo Cabral572014Senior Advisor, Inter-American Development BankYes M M 0612014Partner, Cabral Group, LLCYes M M 0
William M. Diefenderfer, III711999Partner, Diefenderfer, Hoover, McKenna & Wood, LLPYesC 1
Diane Suitt Gilleland701997Retired – State Higher Education ExecutiveYes M M 0
Larry A. Klane602019Co-Founding Principal, Pivot Investment Partners LLCYes M M1
Katherine A. Lehman422014Private Equity InvestorYes M M1462014Managing Partner, Hilltop Private Capital, Private Equity InvestorYesM M C1
Linda A. Mills672014Retired – Corporate Executive, Northrop GrummanYesM C M1712014President, Cadore Group LLCYesC 1
John (Jack) F. Remondi542013President and Chief Executive Officer, NavientNoM 1582013President and Chief Executive Officer, NavientNoM 1
Jane J. Thompson652014CEO, Jane J. Thompson Financial ServicesYes M M3692014CEO, Jane J. Thompson Financial ServicesYesM CM 0
Laura S. Unger562014Financial Services ConsultantYesMC M 2602014President, Unger, Inc.YesM C 2
Barry L. Williams722000Retired – Investment ConsultantYes M M1
David L Yowan602017EVP and Corporate Treasurer American Express CompanyYes M M0642017EVP and Corporate Treasurer American Express CompanyYesMC M0

 

(1)Ages are as of April 13, 2017.9, 2021.

(2)For these purposes, we are considering a Director’s prior service with SLM Corporation and its publicly-held predecessors prior to our separation transaction.
(3)Mr. Munitz, the current ChairMembership as of the Committee, is retiring from the Board effective May 25, 2017.December 31, 2020.

 

ECExecutive CommitteeNGCNominations and Governance CommitteeCChair
ACAudit CommitteeFOCRCFinance and OperationsRisk CommitteeMMember
CCCompensation and Personnel Committee    

 

Additional information about our director nominees, including summaries of their business and leadership experience, skills and qualifications, can be found in the director biographies that begin on page 13 of this proxy statement.

(GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)20172021 Proxy Statement (GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)4

 

 

14

 

General Information

 

Navient Corporation (“Navient,” the “Company,” “we,” “our” or “us”) is furnishing this proxy statement to solicit proxies on behalf of the Board of Directors (the “Board of Directors” or “Board”) for use at our 20172021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”). In light of the continuing impact of COVID-19, this year’s Annual Meeting will be a virtual meeting conducted solely via live webcast. You will be able to attend the Annual Meeting, vote your shares electronically, and submit questions during the meeting by visiting a special website established for this purpose: www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NAVI2021. You will not be able to attend the Annual Meeting in person. A copy of the Notice of 20172021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders accompanies this proxy statement. This proxy statement is being sent or made available, as applicable, to our shareholders beginning on or about April 13, 2017.9, 2021.

 

(GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)20172021 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)5

 


 

Questions and Answers about the Annual Meeting and Voting

Why is this year’s Annual Meeting being held as a virtual only meeting?

This year’s Annual Meeting will again be held as a virtual only meeting in light of the continuing impact of COVID-19. Holding the Annual Meeting as a virtual only meeting allows us to reach the broadest number of shareholders while maintaining our commitment to health and safety.

 

Who may vote?is entitled to attend and vote at the Annual Meeting?

 

 

Only shareholders who owned shares of Navient’s Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Common Stock”), at the close of business on March 30, 2017,23, 2021, the record date for the Annual Meeting, are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting. Navient’s Common Stock is listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”) under the symbol “NAVI.” On March 30, 2017, 285,155,35623, 2021, 180,458,782 shares of Common Stock were outstanding and eligible to be voted. Each share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote with respect to each matter on which holders of Common Stock are entitled to vote.

How do I attend the Annual Meeting?

This year’s Annual Meeting will once again be a virtual only meeting conducted solely via live webcast.

To participate in the Annual Meeting, visit www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NAVI2021 and enter the sixteen-digit control number included on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or your proxy card. The live webcast will begin at 8:00 a.m. EDT on Thursday, May 20, 2021. We encourage you to access the virtual meeting platform at least 15 minutes prior to the start time. If you do not have a sixteen-digit control number, you will still be able to access the webcast as a guest, but will not be able to vote your shares or ask a question during the meeting.

The virtual meeting platform is fully supported across browsers (Internet Explorer, Firefox, Chrome and Safari) and devices (desktops, laptops, tablets and mobile phones) running the most updated version of applicable software and plugins. Participants should ensure they have a strong WiFi connection wherever they intend to participate in the meeting. Further instructions on how to attend and participate in the Annual Meeting, including how to demonstrate proof of stock ownership, will be posted on the virtual meeting website.

We will have technicians ready to assist you with any technical difficulties you may have accessing the virtual meeting. Technical support will be available on the virtual meeting platform beginning at 7:00 a.m. EDT on the day of the meeting and will remain available until thirty minutes after the meeting has finished.

 

Why did I receive a “Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials”?

 

 

Navient furnishes proxy materials to its shareholders primarily via the Internet, instead of mailing printed copies of those materials to each shareholder. By doing so, we save money and reduce our environmental impact. On or about April 14, 2017,9, 2021, Navient will mail a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (“Notice of Internet Availability”) to certain of the Company’s shareholders. The Notice of Internet Availability contains instructions on how to access Navient’s proxy materials and vote online or vote by telephone. The Notice of Internet Availability also contains a 15-digit16-digit control number that you will need to vote your shares. If you previously chose to receive Navient’s proxy materials electronically, you will continue to receive access to these materials via an e-mail that provides electronic links to these documents unless you elect otherwise.

 

(GRAPHIC)2021 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)6


How do I request paper copies of the proxy materials?

 

 

You may request paper copies of the proxy materials for the Annual Meeting by following the instructions included on your Notice of Internet Availability or listed atwww.proxyvote.com, by telephoning 1-800-579-1639, or by sending an e-mail tosendmaterial@proxyvote.com.

 

What is the difference between holding shares as a beneficial owner in street name and as a shareholder of record?

 

 

If your shares are held in street name through a broker, bank, trustee or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of those shares. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee how to vote your shares. Without your voting instructions, your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee may only vote your shares on proposals considered to be routine matters. The only routine matter being considered at the Annual Meeting is Proposal 2 (relating to the ratification of the independent registered public accounting firm). Proposals 1 3 and 43 are considered non-routine matters. For non-routine matters, your shares will not be voted without your specific voting instructions. We encourage you to vote your shares.

 

If your shares are registered directly in your name with Navient’s transfer agent, Computershare, you are considered to be a shareholder of record with respect to those shares. As a shareholder of record, you have the right to grant your voting proxy directly to NavientNavient’s Board of Directors or to a third party, or to vote in person at the Annual Meeting.

 (GRAPHIC)2017 Proxy Statement (GRAPHIC)6

How do I vote?

Navient encourages shareholders to vote in advance of the Annual Meeting, even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting. You may vote in one of the following ways:

Vote in advance of the meeting(GRAPHIC) Vote your shares atwww.proxyvote.com. Votes submitted via the Internet must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on May 24, 2017. Please have your Notice of Internet Availability or proxy card available when you log on.Vote in person at the meeting(GRAPHIC) If you hold shares directly in your name as a shareholder of record, you may either vote in person or be represented by another person at the Annual Meeting by executing a legal proxy designating that person as your proxy to vote your shares. If you hold your shares in street name, you must obtain a legal proxy from your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee and present it to the inspector of elections with your ballot to be able to vote at the Annual Meeting. To request a legal proxy, please follow the instructions atwww.proxyvote.com
(GRAPHIC) Call the toll-free number (1-800-579-1639).You may call this toll-free telephone number, which is available 24-hours a day, and follow the pre-recorded instructions. Please have your Notice of Internet Availability or proxy card available when you call. If you hold your shares in street name, your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee may provide you additional instructions regarding voting your shares by telephone. Votes submitted telephonically must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on May 24, 2017.
(GRAPHIC) If you hold your shares in street name through a broker, bank, trustee or other nominee and want to vote by mail, you must request paper copies of the proxy materials. Once you receive your paper copies, you will need to complete, sign and date the voting instruction form and return it in the prepaid return envelope provided. Your voting instruction form must be received no later than the close of business on May 24, 2017.

 

What if I hold my shares in street name and I do not provide my broker, bank, trustee or other nominee with instructions about how to vote my shares?

 

 

You may instruct your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee on how to vote your shares using any of the methods described above. If you do not provide them with instructions on how to vote your shares prior to the Annual Meeting, they will have discretionary authority to vote your shares only with respect to routine matters. Only Proposal 2 (relating to the ratification of the independent registered public accounting firm) is considered to be a routine matter, and the firmyour broker, bank, trustee or other nominee will not have discretion to vote your shares with respect to Proposals 1 3 or 4.3. If you do not give your instructions on how to vote your shares on Proposals 1 3 or 4,3, your shares will then be referred to as “broker non-votes” and will not be counted in determining whether either Proposal 1 3 or 43 is approved. Please participate in the election of directors and vote on all of the proposals by returning your voting instructions to your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee.

 (GRAPHIC)2017 Proxy Statement (GRAPHIC)7

 

How do I vote shares of Common Stock held in my 401(k) Plan?

 

 

If you participate in the Navient 401(k) Savings Plan, you may vote the number of shares equivalent to your interest in the plan’s company stock fund, if any, as credited to your account on the record date. You will need to instruct the 401(k) Savings Plan Trusteetrustee by telephone, internet or by mail on how to vote your shares. Voting instructions must be received no later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on May 24, 2017.15, 2021. If you own shares through the Navient 401(k) Savings Plan and do not provide voting instructions with respect to your plan shares, the Trusteetrustee will vote your plan shares on each proposal in the same proportion as other plan shares are being voted.

(GRAPHIC)2021 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)7


How do I vote?

Navient encourages shareholders to vote in advance of the Annual Meeting, even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting. You may vote in one of the following ways: 


VOTE BY INTERNET BEFORE THE MEETINGDescription: D:\Job Folder\Ashwin\2021\April\03\SUH_nc10022777x1 -- DEF 14A -- Navient Corp_V1\5. Final\nc10022777x1_img021.jpgVote your shares at www.proxyvote.com. Votes submitted via the Internet must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on May 19, 2021. Please have your Notice of Internet Availability or proxy card available when you log on.Description: D:\Job Folder\Ashwin\2021\April\03\SUH_nc10022777x1 -- DEF 14A -- Navient Corp_V1\5. Final\nc10022777x1_img025.jpgIf you hold shares directly in your name as a shareholder of record, you may either vote or be represented by another person at the Annual Meeting by executing a legal proxy designating that person as your proxy to vote your shares. If you hold your shares in street name, you must obtain a legal proxy from your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee and present it to the inspector of elections with your ballot to be able to vote at the Annual Meeting. To request a legal proxy, please follow the instructions at www.proxyvote.com
VOTE BY PHONEDescription: D:\Job Folder\Ashwin\2021\April\03\SUH_nc10022777x1 -- DEF 14A -- Navient Corp_V1\5. Final\nc10022777x1_img022.jpgCall the toll-free number (1-800-690-6903). You may call this toll-free telephone number, which is available 24-hours a day, and follow the pre-recorded instructions. Please have your Notice of Internet Availability or proxy card available when you call. If you hold your shares in street name, your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee may provide you additional instructions regarding voting your shares by telephone. Votes submitted telephonically must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on May 19, 2021.
VOTE BY MAILDescription: D:\Job Folder\Ashwin\2021\April\03\SUH_nc10022777x1 -- DEF 14A -- Navient Corp_V1\5. Final\nc10022777x1_img023.jpgIf you hold your shares in a street name through a broker, bank, trustee or other nominee and want to vote by mail, you must request paper copies of the proxy materials. Once you receive your paper copies, you will need to complete, sign and date the voting instruction form and return it in the prepaid return envelope provided. Your voting instruction form must be received no later than the close of business on May 19, 2021.
VOTE BY INTERNET DURING THE MEETINGDescription: D:\Job Folder\Ashwin\2021\April\03\SUH_nc10022777x1 -- DEF 14A -- Navient Corp_V1\5. Final\nc10022777x1_img024.jpg

Go to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NAVI2021.  

Vote must be submitted by the close of polls during the Annual Meeting. 

(GRAPHIC)2021 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)8


 

How do proxies work?

 

 

Navient’s Board of Directors is requesting your proxy. Giving your proxy means that you authorize the persons named as proxies therein to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting in the manner you specify in your proxy (or to exercise their discretion as described herein). If you hold your shares as a record holder and sign and return a proxy card but do not specify how to vote on a proposal, the persons named as proxies will vote your shares in accordance with the Board of Directors’ recommendations. The Board of Directors has recommended that shareholders vote:

 

“FOR”the election of each of the director nominees named in Proposal 1;
“FOR” the election of each of the director nominees named in Proposal 1;

 

“FOR”ratification of the appointment of Navient’s independent registered public accounting firm, as set forth in Proposal 2;
“FOR” ratification of the appointment of Navient’s independent registered public accounting firm, as set forth in Proposal 2; and

 

“FOR”approval, on a non-binding advisory basis, of the compensation paid to our named executive officers as set forth in this proxy statement, as set forth in Proposal 3; and

FOR”approval of certain amendments to the Amended and Restated Navient Corporation 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan.
“FOR” approval, on a non-binding advisory basis, of the compensation paid to our named executive officers as set forth in this proxy statement as Proposal 3.

 

Giving your proxy also means that you authorize the persons named as proxies to vote on any other matter properly presented at the Annual Meeting in the manner they determine is appropriate. Navient does not know of any other matters to be presented at the Annual Meeting as of the date of this proxy statement.

 

Can I change my vote?

 

 

Yes. If you hold your shares as a record holder, you may revoke your proxy or change your vote at any time prior to the final tallying of votes by:

 

Delivering a written notice of revocation to Navient’s Corporate Secretary at the Office of the Corporate Secretary, 123 Justison Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801;
Delivering a written notice of revocation to Navient’s Corporate Secretary at the Office of the Corporate Secretary, 123 Justison Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801;

 

Submitting another timely vote via the Internet, by telephone or by mailing a new proxy (following the instructions listed under the “How do I vote?section)section above); or

 

AttendingIf you are eligible to vote during the Annual Meeting, you also can revoke your proxy or voting instructions and change your vote during the Annual Meeting by logging into the website at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NAVI2021 and following the voting in person.instructions.

 

If your shares are held in street name, you need to contact your broker, bank, trustee or nominee for instructions on how to revoke or change your voting instructions. Virtual attendance at the Annual Meeting constitutes presence in person for purposes of quorum at the Annual Meeting.

 

What constitutes a quorum?

 

 

A quorum of shareholders is necessary to transact business at the Annual Meeting. A quorum will exist when the holders of a majority of the shares of Common Stock entitled to vote are deemed present in person or represented by proxy, including proxies on which abstentions (withholding authority to vote) are indicated. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted in determining whether a quorum exists.

 

 (GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)20172021 Proxy Statement (GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)89


 

What vote is necessary to approve each matter to be voted on at the Annual Meeting?

 

 

The following table provides a summary of the voting criteria for the Board’s voting recommendations for the matters on the agenda for the 20172021 Annual Meeting:

 

VOTING MATTERS AND BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS

ProposalVoting OptionsVote Required for
Approval
AbstentionsBroker
Non-Votes
Broker
Discretionary
Vote
Permitted
Board’sBoard's Voting
Recommendation
ApprovalNon-VotesDiscretionaryRecommendation
Vote
Permitted
11.Election of Directors“FOR”"FOR" or “AGAINST”Affirmative vote of theNOTNOTNOFOR
"AGAINST"holders of a majorityCOUNTEDCOUNTEDthe election of
of the votes cast.NOT COUNTEDNOT COUNTEDNOFOR the election of each of the
director
nominees
        
22.Ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as Navient’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2017“FOR”"FOR" or “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” from votingAffirmative vote of the holders of a majority of shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the proposal.COUNTED as votes AgainstNOT COUNTEDYESFOR
of KPMG LLP as"AGAINST" orholders of a majorityas votesCOUNTED
Navient’s independent"ABSTAIN"of shares deemedAgainst
registered publicfrom votingpresent or represented
accounting firm forby proxy and entitled
2021to vote on the
proposal.
        
33.   Approve, in a non- binding advisory vote, the compensation paid to Navient’s named executive officers“FOR”"FOR" or “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” from votingAffirmative vote of the holders of a majority of shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the proposal.COUNTED as votes AgainstNOT COUNTEDNOFOR
binding advisory vote,"AGAINST" orholders of a majorityas votesCOUNTED
the compensation paid"ABSTAIN"of shares deemedAgainst
to Navient’s namedfrom votingpresent or represented
executive officersby proxy and entitled
to vote on the
proposal.
        
4Approve the Amended and Restated Navient Corporation 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan“FOR” or “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” from votingAffirmative vote of the holders of a majority of shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the proposal.COUNTED as votes AgainstNOT COUNTEDNOFOR

 

Who will count the vote?

 

 

Votes will be tabulated by an independent inspector of elections.

 

Who can attend the Annual Meeting?

 

 

Only shareholders as of the record date, March 30, 2017,23, 2021, or their duly appointed proxies, may attend. No guests will be allowed to attend the Annual Meeting.

 

 (GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)20172021 Proxy Statement (GRAPHIC)9

What do I need to do to attend the Annual Meeting and when should I arrive?

The Annual Meeting will be held at Navient’s headquarters located at 123 Justison Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801 beginning at 8:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time. Admission to the Annual Meeting will begin at approximately 7:30 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time.

In order to be admitted to the Annual Meeting, you should:

arrive shortly after 7:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, to ensure that you are seated by the start of the Annual Meeting at 8:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time;

be prepared to comply with security requirements, which may include, among other security measures, security guards searching all bags and attendees passing through a metal detector;

leave your camera at home because cameras, transmission, broadcasting and other recording devices, including smartphones, will not be permitted in the meeting room; and

bring photo identification, such as a driver’s license, and proof of ownership of Common Stock on the record date, March 30, 2017. If you are a holder of record, the top half of your proxy card or your Notice of Internet Availability is your admission ticket. If you hold your shares in street name, a recent brokerage statement or a letter from your bank, broker, trustee or other nominee are examples of proof of ownership. If you want to vote your shares held in street name in person, you must obtain a legal proxy in your name from the broker, bank, trustee or other nominee that holds your shares of Common Stock.

Any holder of a proxy from a shareholder must present a properly executed legal proxy and a copy of the proof of ownership.

If you do not provide photo identification and comply with the other procedures outlined above for attending the Annual Meeting in person, you will not be admitted to the Annual Meeting.

 (GRAPHIC)2017 Proxy Statement (GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)10

 


 

Overview of Proposals

 

This proxy statement contains fourthree proposals requiring shareholder action, each of which is discussed in more detail below.

 

Proposal 1 requests the election of the director nominees named in this proxy statement to the Board of Directors.
Proposal 1 requests the election of the director nominees named in this proxy statement to the Board of Directors.

 

Proposal 2 requests ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as Navient’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017.
Proposal 2 requests ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as Navient’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021.

 

Proposal 3 requests the approval, in a non-binding advisory vote, of the compensation paid to our named executive officers as set forth in this proxy statement.

Proposal 4 requests approval of certain amendments to our Amended and Restated 2014 Incentive Compensation Plan.
Proposal 3 requests the approval, in a non-binding advisory vote, of the compensation paid to our named executive officers as set forth in this proxy statement.

 

 (GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)20172021 Proxy Statement (GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)11

 


 

Proposal 1 — Election of Directors

 

Under Navient’sthe Navient Bylaws (the “Bylaws”), the Board of Directors has the authority to determine the size of the Board of Directors and to fill any vacancies that may arise prior to the next annual shareholder meeting. Although the Board has the authority to change theits size at any time, currently the Board has determined thatset the maximum numbersize of directors shall not exceed 13.our Board at 9.

 

On April 4, 2017,1, 2021, the Nominations and Governance Committee recommended and the Board of Directors nominated the following directors for election at the Annual Meeting:

 

John K. Adams, Jr.
Frederick Arnold

Anna Escobedo Cabral
William M. Diefenderfer, III
Diane Suitt Gilleland

Larry A. Klane

Katherine A. Lehman

Linda A. Mills

John (Jack) F. Remondi

Jane J. Thompson

Laura S. Unger
Barry L. Williams

David L. Yowan

 

Biographical information and qualifications and experience for each nominee appearsappear beginning on the next page.

 

In addition to fulfilling the general criteria for director nominees described in the section titled “Nominations Process,” each nominee possesses experience, skills, attributes and other qualifications that the Board of Directors has determined support its oversight of Navient’s business, operations and structure. These qualifications are discussed beginning on the next page along with biographical information regarding each member of the Board of Directors being nominated, including each individual’s age, principal occupation and business experience during the past five years. Information concerning each director is based in part on information received from him or her and in part from Navient’s records.

 

All nominees listed above have consented to being named in this proxy statement and to serve if elected. Should any nominee subsequently decline or be unable to accept such nomination to serve as a director, an event that the Board of Directors does not now expect, the Board of Directors may designate a substitute nominee or the persons voting the shares represented by proxies solicited hereby may vote those shares for a reduced number of nominees. If the Board of Directors designates a substitute nominee, persons named as proxies will vote“FOR” that substitute nominee.

 

Navient’s Bylaws generally provide that the election of a director nominee will be by a majority of the votes cast and voting affirmatively or negatively with respect to the nominee at a meeting for the election of directors at which a quorum is present. Accordingly, a director nominee will be elected to the Board of Directors if the number of shares voted“FOR” the nominee exceeds the number of votes cast“AGAINST” the nominee’s election, without regard to abstentions or broker non-votes. Shares that are not voted affirmatively or negatively in the election of directors, including abstentions and broker non-votes, therefore have no direct effect in the election of directors. Those shares, however, are taken into account in determining whether a sufficient number of shares are present to establish a quorum.

 

If any director nominee fails to receive a majority of the votes cast“FOR” in an uncontested election, that nominee has agreed to automatically tender his or her resignation upon certification of the election results. If such an event were to occur, Navient’s Nominations and Governance Committee will make a recommendation to the Board of Directors on whether to accept or reject such nominee’s resignation. The Board of Directors will act on the recommendation of the Nominations and Governance Committee and publicly disclose its decision and the rationale behind it within 90 days from the date of certification of the election results.

(GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)20172021 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)12


 

NOMINEES FOR ELECTION TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

 

Name and Age
Service as a DirectorPosition, Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Directorships

(PHOTO OF JACK REMONDI) 

Jack Remondi, 54
President and Chief Executive Officer
Navient Corporation

Other Professional and Leadership Experience:

Chairman, Reading is Fundamental

Trustee, Nellie Mae Education Foundation 

Directorships of Other Public Companies:

Cubesmart Real Estate Investment Trust — 2009 to present

Director since
May 2013

SLM Corporation — former Board Member

Skills, Experience and Qualifications:

Mr. Remondi has been the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer since April 2014. He was SLM Corporation’s President and Chief Executive Officer from May 2013 to April 2014, President and Chief Operating Officer from January 2011 to May 2013 and its Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer from January 2008 to January 2011.

Mr. Remondi’s nearly 30-year history in the student loan and business services industry with Navient and its predecessors, in a variety of leadership roles, including as chief executive officer, chief operating officer and chief financial officer, enables him to bring to our Board of Directors a unique historical perspective of Navient, its operations and the evolution of the student loan industry. Mr. Remondi also brings valuable insights to the Board of Directors in the areas of finance, accounting, portfolio management, business operations and student/consumer lending. He has the in-depth knowledge of our industry, customers, investors and competitors, as well as the relationships, to lead our company.

 

Jack Remondi, 58

Director since

May 2013

President and Chief Executive Officer

Navient Corporation

Directorships of Other Public Companies:

CubeSmart Real Estate Investment Trust (NYSE: CUBE) — 2009 to present

Former Directorships of Other Public Companies:

SLM Corporation

Other Professional and Leadership Experience:

Chairman, Reading is Fundamental

Trustee, Nellie Mae Education Foundation

Skills, Experience and Qualifications:

Mr. Remondi has been the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer since April 2014. He was SLM Corporation’s President and Chief Executive Officer from May 2013 to April 2014, President and Chief Operating Officer from January 2011 to May 2013 and its Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer from January 2008 to January 2011.

Mr. Remondi has a nearly 30-year history in the student loan and business services industry with Navient and its predecessors, in a variety of leadership roles, including as chief executive officer, chief operating officer and chief financial officer. He has the in-depth knowledge of our industry, customers, investors and competitors, as well as the relationships, to lead our company. Mr. Remondi brings to our Board of Directors a unique historical perspective of Navient, its operations and the evolution of the student loan industry, and he provides valuable insights to our Board in the areas of finance, accounting, portfolio management, business operations and student/consumer lending.



(GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)20172021 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)13


 

Name and Age
Service as a DirectorPosition, Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Directorships

(PHOTO OF WILLIAM M. DIEFENDERFER) 

William M. Diefenderfer, III, 71

Chairman of the Board since March 2014

Director since
May 1999

Partner

Diefenderfer, Hoover, McKenna & Wood, LLP

Business Experience:

Partner, Diefenderfer, Hoover, McKenna & Wood, LLP, a law firm, Pittsburgh, PA — 1991 to present

Chief Executive Officer and President, Enumerate Solutions, Inc., a privately-owned technology company — 2000 to 2002 

Deputy Director, U.S. Office of Management and Budget — 1989 to 1991

Other Professional and Leadership Experience:

Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) Standing Advisory Group — former Board Member

Directorships of Other Public Companies:

Cubesmart Real Estate Investment Trust — 2004 to present
Chairman of the Board

SLM Corporation — former Board Member

Skills, Experience and Qualifications:

Mr. Diefenderfer’s legal background, his involvement in the executive branch of the federal government, and his leadership roles in business and with the PCAOB, together with his service as a member of other public company boards, both as chairman and as chair of various committees, including audit committees, bring valuable experience in the areas of finance, accounting, business operations, political/governmental affairs and law to our Board of Directors. 

(PHOTO OF JOHN ADAMS) 

John K. Adams, Jr., 61

Director since
November 2014

Retired – Investment Banking

Business Experience:

Managing Director, UBS Investment Bank’s Financial Institutions Group — 2002 to 2013 Managing Director, Credit Suisse First Boston’s Financial Institutions Group — 1985 to 2002

Other Professional and Leadership Experience:

Board President, Good Shepherd Services

Directorships of Other Public Companies:

Charles Schwab Corporation — 2015 to present

Skills, Experience and Qualifications:

Mr. Adams’ significant experience in capital markets and corporate finance, specifically involving financial institutions, along with his knowledge of the U.S. financial services regulatory environment, enables him to bring to our Board of Directors experience in the areas of finance, financial institutions, capital markets and mergers and acquisitions, which expertise is valuable in evaluating our business and growth plans and overseeing the operations and capital markets activities of our company.

 

Linda Mills, 71

Chair of the Board since

June 2019

Director since

May 2014

President

Cadore Group LLC

Business Experience:

President, Cadore Group LLC, a management and IT consulting company — 2015 to present

Corporate Vice President, Operations, Northrop Grumman — 2013 to 2015

Corporate Vice President & President, Information Systems and Information Technology Sectors, Northrop Grumman — 2008 to 2012

Directorships of Other Public Companies:

American International Group, Inc. (NYSE: AIG) — 2015 to present

Other Professional and Leadership Experience:

Board Member Emeritus, Smithsonian National Air & Space Museum

Former Member, Board of Visitors, University of Illinois, College of Engineering

Former Senior Advisory Group and Board Member, Northern Virginia Technology Council

Former Board Member, Wolf Trap Foundation for the Performing Arts

Skills, Experience and Qualifications:

Ms. Mills’ extensive experience in leading businesses and operations for large, complex multinational companies brings a valuable perspective to our Board of Directors in the areas of operations, financial management, strategic re-positioning, risk management, technology, federal, state and local government contracting, and cybersecurity risk. Through insights gained as a director on the board of another large, publicly traded corporation in a highly regulated industry, as well as her service on many nonprofit boards, Ms. Mills brings a unique and wide range of valuable strategic and operational perspectives to our Board.



(GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)20172021 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)14

 


 

Name and Age
Service as a DirectorPosition, Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Directorships

(PHOTO OF ANNA ESCOBEDO) 

Anna Escobedo Cabral, 57

Director since
December 2014

Senior Advisor
Inter-American Development Bank

Business Experience:  

Senior Advisor, Inter-American Development Bank — 2009 to present

Treasurer of the United States, U.S. Department of the Treasury — 2004 to 2009

Director, Smithsonian Institution’s Center for Latino Initiatives — 2003 to 2004

CEO, Hispanic Association on Corporate Responsibility — 1999 to 2003

Staff Director & Chief Clerk, US Senate Committee on the Judiciary — 1993 to 1999

Executive Staff Director, US Senate Task Force on Hispanic Affairs — 1991 to 1999

Other Professional and Leadership Experience:
Member, NatureBridge Regional Advisory Committee
NatureBridge Board of Directors — former member
Financial Services Roundtable Retirement Security Council — former chair
Providence Hospital Foundation Board — former member
American Red Cross Board of Directors — former member
Sewall Belmont House Board of Directors — former member
Martha’s Table Board of Directors — former member

Skills, Experience and Qualifications:

Ms. Cabral’s extensive experience in public policy, government, public affairs, corporate social responsibility and financial literacy, as well as her experience as chief operating officer in the non-profit sector, enables her to provide valuable insights and judgment to our Board of Directors.

(PHOTO OF DIANE SUITT DILLELAND) 

Diane Suitt Gilleland, 70

Director since

July 1997

Adjunct Professor of Higher Education
University of Arkansas, Little Rock

Business Experience: 

Adjunct Professor of Higher Education, University of Arkansas, Little Rock — 2010 to present

Associate Professor of Higher Education, University of Arkansas, Little Rock — 2003 to 2010

Deputy Director, Illinois Board of Higher Education — 1999 to 2003

Chief Executive Officer, Arkansas Board of Higher Education — 1990 to 1997

Chief Finance Officer, Arkansas Board of Higher Education — 1986 to 1990

Other Professional and Leadership Experience:
Member, University of Arkansas Foundation
Member, University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff Foundation Fund
Trustee, Arkansas Arts Center
Directorships of Other Public Companies:
SLM Corporation — former Board Member
Skills, Experience and Qualifications:

Dr. Gilleland’s knowledge of higher education governance and finance, from a university and government perspective, enables her to bring valuable awareness to our Board of Directors on a variety of matters relating to our industry and our customers, including in the areas of academia, student/consumer lending, political/governmental affairs and finance.

 

Frederick Arnold, 67

Director since

August 2018

Financial Executive

Business Experience:

Chief Financial Officer, Convergex Group, LLC — July 2015 to May 2017

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Capmark Financial Group, Inc. — September 2009 to January 2011

Executive Vice President of Finance, Masonite Corporation — February 2006 to September 2007

Executive Vice President, Strategy and Development, Willis North America — 2001 to 2003

Chief Administrative Officer, Willis Group Holdings Ltd. — 2000 to 2001

Chief Financial and Administrative Officer, Willis North America — 2000

Directorships of Other Public Companies:

Valaris plc (OTC: VALPQ) — 2019 to Present

Former Directorships of Other Public Companies:

Syncora Holdings Ltd.

FS KKR Capital Corp.

Corporate Capital Trust

CIFC Corp.

Other Professional and Leadership Experience:

Current Chairman of the Board, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.

Former Director, The We Company

Former Director, Lehman Commercial Paper Inc.

Skills, Experience and Qualifications:

Mr. Arnold spent 20 years as an investment banker primarily at Lehman Brothers and Smith Barney, where he served as managing director and head of European corporate finance. His experience originating and executing mergers and acquisitions and equity financings across a wide variety of industries and geographies, as well as his other board experience, brings a valuable perspective to our Board of Directors. Subsequent to his employment at Lehman Brothers and Smith Barney, Mr. Arnold spent 15 years in various senior financial positions at a number of private equity-owned portfolio companies.



(GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)20172021 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)15

 


 

Name and Age
Service as a DirectorPosition, Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Directorships

(PHOTO OF KATHERINE A. LEHMAN) 

Katherine A. Lehman, 42

Director since
November 2014

Private Equity Investor

Business Experience:

Managing Partner, Hilltop Private Capital — 2016 to Present

Managing Director and Deal Team Leader, Lincolnshire Management — 2009 to 2016

Other Investment Roles, Lincolnshire Management — 2001 to 2009

Other Professional and Leadership Experience:

Board Member, The Robert Toigo Foundation

Director, American Track Services

Director, New York Private Equity Network

True Temper Sports — former Board Member

Gruppo Fabbri — former Board Member

PADI Holding Company — former Board Member

Bankruptcy Management Solutions — former Board Member

Directorships of Other Public Companies:

Stella-Jones (TSX: SJ)

Skills, Experience and Qualifications:

Ms. Lehman’s experience in private equity and financial services, along with her investment evaluation, portfolio oversight and board experience enables her to provide strategic and operational expertise in the areas of finance, review and analysis of investments, mergers and acquisitions, integration and operations, accounting and business, which assist our Board of Directors in evaluating our business and growth plans.

(PHOTO OF LINDA MILLS ) 

Linda Mills, 67

Director since

May 2014

Retired – Corporate Executive

Northrop Grumman

Business Experience:

Corporate Vice President, Operations, Northrop Grumman — 2013 to 2015

Corporate Vice President & President, Information Systems and Information Technology Sectors, Northrop Grumman — 2008 to 2012

Directorships of Other Public Companies:

American International Group, Inc. (AIG) — 2015 to present

Other Professional and Leadership Experience:

Board Member, Smithsonian National Air & Space Museum

Board of Visitors, University of Illinois, College of Engineering 

Senior Advisory Group and Former Board Member, Northern Virginia Technology Council

Wolf Trap Foundation for the Performing Arts – former Board Member

Skills, Experience and Qualifications:

Ms. Mills’ extensive experience in leading businesses and operations for large, complex multinational companies brings a valuable perspective to the Board in the areas of operations, financial management, strategic re-positioning, risk management, technology, government contracting and cyber-risk. When combined with her service as a director on other large publicly traded corporate boards in highly-regulated industries, Ms. Mills brings a wide range of valuable strategic and operational perspectives to our Board of Directors.

 

Anna Escobedo Cabral, 61

Director since

December 2014

Partner

Cabral Group, LLC

Business Experience:

Partner, Cabral Group — 2018 to present

Senior Advisor, Inter-American Development Bank — 2009 to 2018

Treasurer of the United States, U.S. Department of the Treasury — 2004 to 2009 Director, Smithsonian Institution’s Center for Latino Initiatives — 2003 to 2004 CEO, Hispanic Association on Corporate Responsibility — 1999 to 2003

Deputy Staff Director & Chief Clerk, U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary — 1993 to 1999

Executive Staff Director, U.S. Senate Republican Conference Task Force on Hispanic Affairs — 1991 to 1999

Other Professional and Leadership Experience:

Vice Chair, Hispanic Diversity Advisory Committee, Comcast NBCU Trustee, Jessie Ball duPont Fund

Chair, BBVA Microfinance Foundation Board

Former Member, NatureBridge Regional Advisory Committee

Former Member, NatureBridge Board of Directors

Former Chair, Financial Services Roundtable Retirement Security Council

Former Member, Providence Hospital Foundation Board

Former Member, American Red Cross Board of Directors

Former Member, Sewall Belmont House Board of Directors

Former Member, Martha’s Table Board of Directors

Skills, Experience and Qualifications:

Through her extensive experience in public policy, government, public affairs, corporate social responsibility, international development, and financial literacy, as well as her experience as a chief operating officer in the nonprofit sector, Ms. Cabral provides our Board with insights and judgment regarding regulatory policy and the political and legislative process.



(GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)20172021 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)16

 


 

Name and Age
Service as a DirectorPosition, Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Directorships

(PHOTO OF JANE J. THOMPSON)

Jane J. Thompson, 65

Director since 

March 2014

Chief Executive Officer 

Jane J. Thompson Financial Services LLC

Business Experience: 

Chief Executive Officer, Jane J. Thompson Financial Services LLC, a management consulting firm — 2011 to present

President, Financial Services, Walmart Stores, Inc. — 2002 to 2011

Other Professional and Leadership Experience:

Member, Commercial Club of Chicago

Member, The Chicago Network

Former Member, CFPB Consumer Advisory Board

Directorship of Other Public Companies:

Blackhawk Network Holdings, Inc. — 2014 to present

OnDeck Capital, Inc. — 2014 to present

VeriFone Systems, Inc. — 2014 to present

The Fresh Market — 2012 to 2016

Skills, Experience and Qualifications:

Ms. Thompson brings a unique depth and breadth of expertise to our Board of Directors in the areas of consumer behavior, financial services, consumer lending, finance and financial services regulation. She has extensive experience in consumer lending, as well as management experience with large, publicly-traded retail businesses. Combined with other leadership roles in business—including service as director of several public companies and as a member of audit, compensation and risk management committees—Ms. Thompson’s business experience enables her to provide valuable insights in a variety of areas. 

(PHOTO OF LAURA S. UNGER) 

Laura S. Unger, 56

Director since
November 2014

Financial Services Advisor

Business Experience:

Special Advisor, Promontory Financial Group — 2010 to 2014

Independent Consultant to JPMorgan — 2003 to 2009

Former Commissioner, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission — 1997 to 2002

(including six months as Acting Chairman)

Counsel, U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing & Urban Affairs — 1990 to 1997

Other Professional and Leadership Experience:

Board Member, Children’s National Medical Center

Director, Nomura Securities, Inc.

Director, Nomura Global Financial Products

Directorships of Other Public Companies:

CA, Inc. — 2004 to present

CIT Group — 2010 to present

Ambac Financial Group, Inc. — former Board Member

Skills, Experience and Qualifications:

Ms. Unger’s government, public policy and legal and regulatory experience, together with her extensive leadership experience at government agencies, provides the Board with perspectives into regulatory policy and the political and legislative process. She also has significant corporate governance expertise as a member or chair of boards and board committees of public companies and from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

Larry A. Klane, 60

Director since

May 2019

Co-Founding Principal

Pivot Investment Partners LLC

Business Experience:

Global Financial Institutions Leader, Cerberus Capital Management — 2012 to 2013 Chair, Korea Exchange Bank — 2010 to 2012

CEO, Korea Exchange Bank — 2009 to 2012

President of Global Financial Services, Capital One — 2000 to 2008 Managing Director, Bankers Trust/Deutsche Bank — 1994 to 2000

Directorships of Other Public Companies:

The Real Brokerage, Inc. (TSX-V: REAX; OTCQX: REAXF) — June 2020 to present

Former Directorships of Other Public Companies:

VeriFone Systems, Inc.

Korea Exchange Bank

Aozora Bank Ltd.

Other Professional and Leadership Experience:

Director, Goldman Sachs Bank USA

Former Director, Nexi Group S.p.A.

Former Director, Ethoca Limited

Skills, Experience and Qualifications:

Mr. Klane brings an important strategic and operational perspective to our Board given his extensive background in financial services and payment services, including his service in various leadership positions in the financial services industry.



(GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)20172021 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)17


 

Name and Age
Service as a DirectorPosition, Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Directorships

Katherine A. Lehman, 46

Director since

November 2014

Private Equity Investor

Business Experience:

Managing Partner, Hilltop Private Capital — 2016 to Present

Managing Director and Deal Team Leader, Lincolnshire Management — 2009 to 2016 Other Investment Roles, Lincolnshire Management — 2001 to 2009

Directorships of Other Public Companies:

Stella-Jones (TSX: SJ) — 2016 to present Chair of the Board

Other Professional and Leadership Experience:

Director, American Track Services

Director, Spiral Holding

Director, Bloom Engineering

Former Board Member, The Robert Toigo Foundation

Former Board Member, True Temper Sports

Former Board Member, Gruppo Fabbri

Former Board Member, PADI Holding Company

Former Board Member, Bankruptcy Management Solutions

Skills, Experience and Qualifications:

Ms. Lehman’s experience in private equity and financial services, along with her investment evaluation, portfolio oversight and board experience enable her to provide strategic and operational expertise in the areas of finance, review and analysis of investments, capital allocation, mergers and acquisitions, integration and operations, accounting and business, which assist our Board of Directors in evaluating our business and growth plans.



(GRAPHIC)2021 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)18


Name and Age

(PHOTO BARRY L. WILLIAMS)Service as a Director

Barry L. Williams, 72

Director since
July 2000

Retired – Investment Consultant

Position, Principal Occupation, Business Experience:

President, Williams Pacific Ventures, Inc., a consulting and investment company — 1987 to 2014

Other Professional and Leadership Experience:

Director, CH2M Hill Companies

Director, Sutter Health 

Trustee, Management Leadership for Tomorrow

Trustee Emeritus, American Conservatory Theater

Directorships of Other Public Companies:

PG&E Corporation — 1996 to present

Lead Director and Chairman of the Compensation Committee

Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company — former Board Member 

Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. — former Board Member

SLM Corporation — former Board Member

Skills, Experience and Qualifications:Directorships

Jane J. Thompson, 69

Director since

March 2014

Chief Executive Officer

Jane J. Thompson Financial Services LLC

Business Experience:

Chief Executive Officer, Jane J. Thompson Financial Services LLC, a management consulting firm — 2011 to present

President, Financial Services, Walmart Stores, Inc. — 2002 to 2011 

Executive  Vice  President,  Credit,  Home  Services,  Online  and  Corporate  Planning, Sears, Roebuck and Co. — 1988 to 1999 

Consultant/Partner, McKinsey & Company — 1978 to 1988

Former Directorships of Other Public Companies:

Mitek Systems, Inc.

OnDeck Capital, Inc.

Blackhawk Network Holdings, Inc.

VeriFone Systems, Inc.

The Fresh Market

Other Professional and Leadership Experience:

Former Chair, Pangea Universal Holdings, Inc.

Member, Commercial Club of Chicago

Former Member and Chair, The Chicago Network

Former Member and Board Member, The Economic Club of Chicago

Former Member, Center for Financial Services Innovation Board

Former Member, CFPB Consumer Advisory Board

Former Member and Chair, Boys & Girls Clubs of Chicago Board

Former Member, Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago Board of Trustees

Former Trustee, Bucknell University

Former Member, Corporate Advisory Board, Darden Graduate School of Business, University of Virginia

Former  Member,  Corporate  Advisory  Board,  Walton  Graduate  School  of  Business, University of Arkansas

Skills, Experience and Qualifications:

Ms. Thompson brings a unique depth and breadth of expertise to our Board of Directors in the areas of consumer behavior, financial services, consumer lending, finance and financial services regulation. She has extensive experience in consumer lending, as well as management experience with large, publicly traded businesses. Combined with other leadership roles in business—including service as a director of several public companies and as a member of various audit, compensation, risk management and governance committees—Ms. Thompson brings valuable insights to our Board in a variety of areas.



(GRAPHIC)2021 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)19


Mr. Williams’ experience leading an investment
Name and consulting firm, combined with other leadership roles in business, brings management, leadership, and business skills to our Board of Directors. His experience in numerous areas, including financial, audit, operations and real estate, when combined with his serviceAge
Service as a director of a number of public companies, including service on several audit, governance and compensation committees, enables him to provide relevant and actionable insights in the areas of finance, financial services, business operations, capital markets and corporate governance.

Director

(PHOTO OF DAVID YOWAN) 

David L. Yowan, 60

Director since
March 2017

Consumer Financial Services Executive

Position, Principal Occupation, Business Experience:

Executive Vice President and Treasurer, American Express Company — 2006 to present Senior Treasury Management, American Express Company — 1999 to 2006

Senior Vice President, North American Consumer Bank Treasury, Citigroup — 1987 to 1998

Skills, Experience and Qualifications:Directorships

Mr. Yowan’s extensive experience in consumer financial services including his long tenure with the world’s foremost payment card issuer make him a valuable addition to Navient’s Board of Directors. As a recent addition to the Board, Mr. Yowan’s expertise in risk management, balance sheet management, asset securitization and strategy make him ideally suited to assist the Board in overseeing financial, operational and credit risk management.

Laura S. Unger, 60

Director since

November 2014

President

Unger, Inc.

Business Experience:

President, Unger, Inc., a financial services consulting firm — 2018 to present Special Advisor, Promontory Financial Group — 2010 to 2014

Independent Consultant to JPMorgan — 2003 to 2009

Commissioner, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission — 1997 to 2002 (including six months as Acting Chairman)

Counsel, U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing & Urban Affairs — 1990 to 1997

Directorships of Other Public Companies:

CIT Group (NYSE: CIT) — 2010 to present

Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR) — 2018 to present

Former Directorships of Other Public Companies:

CA Technologies

Ambac Financial Group, Inc.

Other Professional and Leadership Experience:

Board Member, Children’s National Medical Center

Director, Nomura Holdings America

Director, Nomura Securities, Inc.

Director, Nomura Global Financial Products

Skills, Experience and Qualifications:

Ms. Unger has significant corporate governance expertise as a member or chair of boards and board committees of public companies and her service at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Her government, public policy and legal and regulatory experience, together with her extensive leadership experience at government agencies, provides our Board of Directors with perspectives into regulatory policy and the political and legislative process.



David L. Yowan, 64

Director since

March 2017

Consumer Financial Services Executive

American Express Company

Business Experience:

Executive Vice President and Treasurer, American Express Company — 2006 to present

Senior Treasury Management, American Express Company — 1999 to 2006 

Senior Vice President, North American Consumer Bank Treasury, Citigroup — 1987 to 1998

Skills, Experience and Qualifications:

Mr. Yowan’s extensive experience in consumer financial services including his long tenure with the world’s largest payment card issuer makes him a valuable addition to Navient’s Board of Directors. His insight and experience in risk management, balance sheet management, asset securitization and strategy make him ideally suited to assist our Board in overseeing financial, operational and credit risk management.



Board Recommendation

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE NOMINEES NAMED ABOVE.

 

(GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)20172021 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)1820


 

Corporate Governance

 

Role and Responsibilities of the Board of Directors

 

 

The Board of Directors believes strong corporate governance is critical to achieving Navient’s performance goals, enhancing shareholder value, and to maintaining the trust and confidence of investors, employees, regulatory agencies and other stakeholders.

 

The primary responsibilities of the Board of Directors are to:

 

Review Navient’s long-term strategies and set long-term performance metrics;

 

Review and approve Navient’s annual business plan and multi-year strategic plan, periodicallyregularly review performance against such plans and ensure alignment between the Company’s actions and its longer-term strategic objectives;

 

Review risks affecting Navient and its processes for managing those risks, and oversee assignment andmanagement performance ofwith regard to various aspects of risk management, compliance and governance;

 

Select, evaluate and compensate the Chief Executive Officer;

 

Plan for succession of the Chief Executive Officer and members of the executive management team;

 

Review and approve major transactions;

 

Through its Audit Committee, select and oversee Navient’s independent registered public accounting firm;

 

Oversee financial matters, including financial reporting, financial controls and financial controls;capital allocation;

 

Recommend director candidates for election by shareholders and plan for the succession of directors; and

 

Evaluate the Board’s composition, succession, and its own effectiveness.

 

Board Governance Guidelines

 

The Board of Directors’ Governance Guidelines (the “Guidelines”) are reviewed, at least annually, by the Nominations and Governance Committee. The Guidelines are publishedcan be found atwww.navient.com under “Investors, Corporate Governance” and a written copy may be obtained by contacting the Corporate Secretary atcorporatesecretary@navient.com. The Guidelines, along with Navient’s Bylaws, embody the following governance practices, among others:

 

A majority of the members of the Board of Directors must be independent directors and all members of the Audit, Compensation and Personnel, and Nominations and Governance Committees must be independent. Until May 1, 2016, for purposes of determining independence when evaluating a director’s relationship with Navient, “Navient” included SLM Corporation and its subsidiaries, as affiliates of the Company.

 

All directors stand for re-election each year and must be elected by a majority of the votes cast in uncontested elections.

 

No individual is eligible for nomination to the Board uponafter the earlier of (i) their 75thbirthday or (ii) effective in 2018, after having served in the aggregate more than 20 years on the Board or on the board of the Company’s predecessor companies.Board.

 

The Board of Directors has separated the roles of ChairmanChair of the Board and CEO, and currently has an independent, non-executive director serves as Chairman.Chair.

 

 (GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)20172021 Proxy Statement (GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)1921

 


 

Independent members of the Board of Directors and its committees meet in executive session, outside the presence of management or the CEO at the beginning ofduring each regularly-scheduled Board meeting as well as at the end of each regularly-scheduled Board and committee meeting. The ChairmanChair of the Board (or the applicable committee chair) presides over these sessions.

 

Navient maintains stock ownership and retention guidelines for directors and executive officers and has a policy to prohibitprohibiting the hedging or pledging of its stock.

 

The Board of Directors and its committeeseach committee conduct performance reviews annually through a combination of online questionnaires and have routinely done so.individual director interviews.

 

The Board of Directors and its committees may engage their own advisors.

 

The Board is preparing for anticipated director retirements that will result from a combination of the Board’s tenure and age limits. As part of this process, the Nominations and Governance Committee at the direction of the Board, has conductedroutinely conducts an assessment of director skillsets in light of the Company’s present and future businesses.businesses to ensure Board effectiveness. The Chair of the Board anticipates additional individuals will be recruited as directorsand the Chair of the Nominations and Governance Committee also meet with each director on an annual basis to assess Board effectiveness and engage in order to supplement the skills of our directorsdiscussions regarding Board succession planning and to have the Board’s performance and experience be fully matrixed across all known and anticipated needs.director recruiting.

 

Board Leadership Structure

 

 

The Board of Directors has separated the roles of ChairmanChair of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer, and the Board of Directors continues to believe that this structure properly balances the Board’s management and governance responsibilities. The Board of Directors also believes that its leadership structure has created an environment of open, efficienttransparent communication between the Board of Directors and management, enabling the Board of Directors to maintain an active, informed role in oversight by being able to monitor and manage those matters that may present significant risks to Navient.

 

While it is the opinion of the Board of Directors that its leadership structure is appropriately balanced between promoting Navient’s strategic development with the Board’s management oversight function, asin the future, when the Board contemplates botheither CEO succession and Chairman of theor Board Chair succession, it may choose to change this separationgovernance structure at any time.

Board Succession Planning

Our Board Governance Guidelines provide that no individual is eligible for nomination to the Board after the earlier to occur of (i) their 75th birthday or, (ii) after they have served more than 20 years on the Board.1 The Board actively engages in succession planning and director recruiting to ensure that the size of the Board and the skills of the directors continue to align with our business strategy and the environment in which we operate. Each year the Chair of the Board and the Chair of the Nominations and Governance Committee meet with each director to engage in discussions regarding Board succession planning and director recruiting. In recruiting new directors, the Board seeks to achieve a diversity of gender, age, race, ethnicity, perspectives and experience.

 

Management Succession Planning

 

 

We have succession plans and talent management processesprograms in place for our Chief Executive Officer and for our team of senior executives. Our senior management succession planning process is an organization-wide practice designed to proactively identify, develop and retain the leadership talent that is critical for future business success. We also look to promote diversity within our management team—in terms of gender, race, ethnicity, perspectives and other factors—as part of the management succession planning process.

1 Our Board Governance Guidelines state: “…individuals will not be nominated for election to the Board after the earlier to occur of (i) their 75th birthday or, (ii) after they have served more than 20 years on the Board.”

(GRAPHIC)2021 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)22


 

The succession plan for our Chief Executive Officer is reviewed regularly by the Compensation and Personnel Committee and the other independent directors. The plan identifies a “readiness” level and ranking for each internal candidate and also incorporates the flexibility to define an external hire as a succession option. Formal succession planning for the rest of our senior leaders is also a regularan ongoing process, which includes identifying a rank and readiness level for each potential internal candidate and strategically planning for external hires for positions where for example, gaps, if any, are identified.

 

In 2016, our Board re-examined emergency CEO and senior management succession planning in extraordinary circumstances. Our emergency CEO succession planningplan is intended to enable our company to respond to an immediate and unexpected position vacancies,vacancy, including those resulting from a major catastrophe, by continuing our company’scatastrophe. The plan allows the Company to continue safe and sound operation and minimizingminimizes potential disruption or loss of continuity to our company’s business and operations.

 (GRAPHIC)2017 Proxy Statement (GRAPHIC)20

 

Director Independence

 

 

For a director to be considered independent, the Board of Directors must determine that the director does not have any direct or indirect material relationship with Navient (or, until May 1, 2016,that would interfere with SLM Corporation).the director’s exercise of independent judgment or that would render the director incapable of making a decision with only the best interests of the Company in mind. The Board of Directors has adopted the Guidelines, which include the standards for determining director independence whichindependence. In addition to Delaware law requirements, the Guidelines conform to the independence requirements of Rule 10A-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and the Nasdaq listing standards. The Guidelines are publishedcan be found atwww.navient.com under “Investors, Corporate Governance” and a written copy may be obtained by contacting the Corporate Secretary atcorporatesecretary@navient.com.

 

At the end of 2016,2020, the Board of Directors was comprised of 119 members, 108 of whom were affirmatively determined to be independent. David L. Yowan was appointed to the Board on March 30, 2017 to fill a vacancy created by the resignation or retirement of certain directors. The independent members of the Board of Directors at the end of fiscal 20162020 were: John K. Adams Jr.;Frederick Arnold; Anna Escobedo Cabral; William M. Diefenderfer, III; Diane Suitt Gilleland;Larry A. Klane; Katherine A. Lehman; Linda A. Mills; Barry A. Munitz; Jane J. Thompson; Laura S. Unger; and BarryDavid L. Williams.Yowan. During 2016,2020, and again in 2021, the Board of Directors determined that each of these individuals met the Nasdaq listing standards and Navient’s own director independence standards. In addition, the Board of Directors considered transactions and relationships between each director and any member of his or her immediate family on one hand, and Navient, on the other, to confirm that there were no transactions or relationships that would impair such director’s independence. Only Mr. Remondi was determined not to be independent under the Guidelines or the Nasdaq listing standards. Upon the appointment of Mr. Yowan to the Board in March of 2017, the Board of Directors determined that he also was independent in accordance with all applicable independence standards.independent.

 

Each member of the Board of Directors’ Audit, Compensation and Personnel, and Nominations and Governance Committees is independent within the meaning of the Nasdaq listing standards, Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act Rule 10A-3 and Navient’s own director independence standards.

 

Board of Directors Meetings and Attendance at Annual Meeting

 

 

The full Board of Directors met eight33 times in 2016.2020. Each of our incumbent directors attended at least 75 percent91% of the total number of meetings of the Board of Directors and committeescommittee meetings during his or her tenure on that committee. Our directors on average attended 96 percent of all meetings of the Board of Directors and applicable committees, with the average attendance across all our incumbent directors being 98.4% in 2016. Other than Mr. Williams, all of our2020. All directors attended the Company’s 20162020 annual meeting of shareholders. All of our directors are expected to attendshareholders, other than Marjorie L. Bowen, who served on the 2017Board in 2020 but did not stand for reelection at the 2020 Annual Meeting.

 

Committee Membership

 

 

The Board of Directors has established the following standing committees to assist in its oversight responsibilities: an Audit Committee, a Compensation and Personnel Committee, a Nominations and Governance Committee, a Finance and OperationsRisk Committee, and an Executive Committee. In 2020, the Board replaced an existing standing committee, the Finance and Operations Committee, with a new Risk Committee. The Risk Committee focuses primarily on oversight of the Company’s enterprise risk management infrastructure, including oversight of information security and cybersecurity matters. In connection with establishing the Risk Committee, the Nominations and Governance Committee reallocated the duties of the other standing committees to shift certain risk oversight responsibilities to this new committee, with other oversight responsibilities moving

(GRAPHIC)2021 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)23


to the full Board. To better reflect the broad oversight responsibilities of the Compensation and Personnel Committee with respect to our workplace—including oversight of our strategy for promoting diversity, equity and inclusion in the workplace—the Board has committed to renaming this standing committee in 2021 the Compensation and Human Resources Committee.

Each standing committee is governed by a Board-approved written charter, which is evaluated annually, and which sets forth the respective committee’s functions and responsibilities. Membership of each of the committees is also changed as part of a regular rotation. Investors may find the current membership of the Board’s standing committees athttp:https://www.navient.com/about/investors/corp_governance/corporate-governance/.

 

For 2016,In 2020, as part of the Board’s regular governance practice, an 18-month work-plan was created from the charters of the Audit, Compensation and Personnel, Nominations and Governance, and Finance and OperationsRisk Committees so that the responsibilities of each committee would be addressed at appropriate times throughout the year. These work-plans will be reviewed and revised as appropriatea matter of course in 2017.2021. Agendas for committee meetings are developed based on each committee’s work-plan together with other current matters the Board chair, the committee chair or management believes should be addressed at the meeting. The chair of each committee provides regular reports to the Board of Directors regarding the subject of the committee’s meetings and any committee actions.

 

The following table sets forth the membership and number of meetings held for each committee of the Board of Directors during 2016.2020. This table reflects the membership of each committee as of December 31, 2016.2020.12 Mr. Yowan joined the Board

1Steven L. Shapiro served as a member of the Board, Compensation and Personnel Committee and the Nominations and Governance Committee during 2016 until his retirement from the Board in May 2016. Ann Torre Bates was a member of the Board and Chair of the Audit Committee until May 25, 2016, at which time she became Chair of the Nominations and Governance Committee. She continued to serve on the Audit Committee until her resignation from the Board on August 16, 2016.

 (GRAPHIC)2017 Proxy Statement (GRAPHIC)21

in March 2017 and is a member of the Audit Committee and the Finance and Operations Committee. It is the practice of the Board to hold its regular committee meetings in conjunction with the regular meetings of the Board. Given the Audit Committee’s responsibilities relating to our financial statements and financial reporting, it is expected that the Audit Committee will meet more often than the other committees.

 

 Audit
Committee
Compensation
and
Personnel Committee
Executive CommitteeFinance
and
Operations Committee
Nominations
and
Governance Committee
John K. Adams, Jr.(1)X XCHAIR 
Anna Escobedo Cabral(2)X  ��X
William M. Diefenderfer, III  CHAIR  
Diane Suitt GillelandX   X
Katherine A. Lehman X X 
Linda A. Mills CHAIRXX 
Barry A. Munitz(3) XX CHAIR
John F. Remondi  X  
Jane J. Thompson(4) X X 
Laura S. Unger(5)CHAIR X X
Barry L. Williams X X 
Number of Meetings in 2016138565
Audit
Committee
Compensation
and
Personnel
Committee
Executive
Committee
Risk
Committee (1)
Nominations
and
Governance
Committee
Frederick ArnoldXX
Anna Escobedo CabralXX
Larry A. KlaneXX
Katherine A. LehmanXXCHAIR
Linda A. MillsCHAIR
John F. RemondiX
Jane J. ThompsonCHAIRXX
Laura S. UngerXXCHAIR
David L. Yowan (2)CHAIRXX
Number of Meetings in 2020138566

 

Chair = Committee Chair

X = Committee Member

 

(1)Mr. Adams succeeded Mr. Williams as Chair ofIn 2020, the Board replaced an existing standing committee, the Finance and Operations Committee, effective May 25, 2016.with a new Risk Committee.

(2)Ms. Escobedo Cabral alsoMr. Yowan served on the FinanceCompensation and OperationsPersonnel Committee until May 25, 2016,20, 2020, when shehe became a member of Nominations and Governance Committee.

(3)Mr. Munitz served on the Nominations and Governance Committee throughout 2016. Upon the departure of Ms. Bates in August 2016, the Board appointed Mr. Munitz as Chair of the committee.

(4)Ms. Thompson also served on the Audit Committee until May 25, 2016, when she became a member of Compensation and Personnel Committee.

(5)The board He was appointed Ms. Unger to be Chair of the Audit Committee on May 25, 2016.July 2, 2020, succeeding Ms. Cabral.

 

The Chair of the Nominations and Governance Committee, Mr. Munitz, is not standing for re-election to the Board and will be retiring effective May 25, 2017. The Board has determined that, effective May 24, 2017, Ms. Unger will be the Chair of the Nominations and Governance Committee and Ms. Escobedo Cabral will be the Chair of the Audit Committee.

This chair succession is part of a deliberate succession and rotation plan begun by the Board of Directors in 2015. The Board reserves the right to assess each committee’s needs and the skills, expertise and other qualifications when naming a new chair, and may name another director as the chair of that committee.

Audit Committee

 

The Audit Committee has been established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”).Act. During 2016,2020, the Audit Committee, as set forth in its charter, assisted the Board of Directors in fulfilling its responsibilities by providing oversight relating to: (1) the integrity of Navient’s financial statements; (2) the Company’s system of internal controls; (3) the qualifications, performance and independence of Navient’s independent registered accounting firm; (4) the performance of the Company’s internal audit function; (5) risks related to Navient’s compliance, legal and regulatory matters; and (6) the review of related party transactions. In addition, the Audit Committee reviews the Company’s procedures for the receipt, retention and handling of confidential, anonymous complaints pertaining to accounting, internal accounting controls and auditing matters, including procedures for the periodic review of violations or waivers of compliance with the Company’s Code of Business Conduct, and prepares the report of the Audit Committee for Navient’s annual proxy statement, as

2 Marjorie L. Bowen served on the Board in 2020 but did not stand for reelection at the 2020 Annual Meeting. During her tenure on the Board, Ms. Bowen served on the Audit Committee and the Nominations and Governance Committee.

(GRAPHIC)2021 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)24


required by the SEC. The Board of Directors has determined that two members of the Audit Committee—Committee, Mr. Yowan, the Committee Chair, and Mr. Adams—are qualifiedArnold, qualify as audit committee financial experts, as that term is defined under the rules promulgated by the SEC. During 2016, none2020, no member of the Audit Committee members served on the audit committee of more than three public companies.

 (GRAPHIC)2017 Proxy Statement (GRAPHIC)22

 

Compensation and Personnel Committee

 

Pursuant to the provisions of its charter, which can be found on our website in full, the primary responsibilities of the Compensation and Personnel Committee (also referred to herein as the “Compensation Committee”) during 20162020 were to: (1) approve or recommend, as appropriate, compensation, benefits and employment arrangements for Navient’s Chief Executive Officer and certain other executive officers who report to the CEO (collectively “Executive Management”), and independent members of the Board of Directors; (2) review and approve benefit plans, compensation plans, incentive plans and incentivebenefit plans applicable to Executive Management; (3) review, approve and administer all equity-based plans of the Company; (4) supervise the administration of employee benefit plans of Navient as required by law or the plan terms or as otherwise appropriate; (5) receive periodic reports regarding the Company’s compensation programs as they relate to all employees; (6) review Navient’s management development and recommend to the Board of Directors succession plans applicable to Executive Management; (7) review and consider current and developing compensation and personnel related topics as appropriate;appropriate, including performance management, leadership development, turnover and retention, diversity, and employee engagement; (8) review Navient’s strategy for promoting diversity, equity and inclusion in the workplace; and (9) prepare the report of the Compensation Committee for inclusion in this proxy statement, as required. The Compensation Committee, in coordination with the Audit Committee, also reviewedreviews the report of management on the potential risks arising from Navient’s compensation policies and practices to determine whether such policies and practices are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

 

The Compensation Committee considers executive officer and director compensation on an annual basis. In January or February of each year, after consultation with the independent chairmanchair and other independent directors, as well as its independent consultant, if one has been retained, the Compensation Committee setsapproves the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer and Executive Management. At that time, the Compensation Committee also makes a recommendation to the Board of Directors regarding director compensation. The Compensation Committee reviewedreviews executive compensation as described in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”Analysis” section of this proxy statement. In addition, throughout the year, the Compensation Committee considers executive compensation consistent with its responsibilities, as warranted by any personnel changes.

Risk Committee

During 2020, the Risk Committee assisted the Board of Directors, as required by its charter, by providing oversight with respect to: (1) the Company’s Enterprise Risk Management policy, standards and program; (2) material corporate finance matters, including investments, mergers and acquisitions, capital management, financing and funding strategy; (3) technology operations, information security and cybersecurity matters; (4) marketing and product development; (5) the Company’s lending programs; and (6) the Company’s information security program and cybersecurity. The Risk Committee also reviewed the financial risk profile of Navient, including capital market access, credit, interest rate, currency and programmatic/contractual risks and reviewed with management steps to manage those risks.

Nominations and Governance Committee

In accordance with its charter, the Nominations and Governance Committee assists the Board of Directors in establishing appropriate standards for the governance of Navient, the operations of the Board of Directors generally and the qualifications of directors. It recommends to the Board of Directors the director nominees for the annual meeting of shareholders; oversees the orientation of new directors and the ongoing education of the Board; recommends director assignments to the Board’s standing committees; oversees the Company’s reputational and political risks, including environment, social and governance (“ESG”) risks; supervises the Board’s self-evaluation and succession process; and reviews and recommends changes to the Board’s Governance Guidelines. Additionally, the Nominations and Governance Committee routinely benchmarks the Company’s governance practices against industry best practices and makes appropriate changes when necessary.

Each of the Committees’ charters is available at www.navient.com under “Investors, Corporate Governance.” Shareholders may obtain a written copy of a committee charter by contacting the Corporate Secretary at corporatesecretary@navient.com or Navient Corporation, 123 Justison Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801.

(GRAPHIC)2021 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)25


 

Executive Committee

 

Since its creation, membership of the Executive Committee has included the committee chairs, the Chief Executive Officer and the chairman.Board chair. Under its charter, the Executive Committee has authority to act on behalf of the Board of Directors when the full Board of Directors is not available, assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with regard to establishing risk tolerances and parameters for Navient, and oversees the allocation of risk oversight responsibilities among Board committees.

Finance and Operations Committee

During 2016, the Finance and Operations Committee assisted the Board of Directors, as required by its charter, by providing oversight with respect to: (1) material corporate finance matters, including investments, acquisitions, capital management, financing and funding strategy; (2) technology and operations; (3) marketing and product development; (4) the Company’s lending programs; and (5) the Company’s information security program and cyber-security. The Finance and Operations Committee also reviewed the financial risk profile of Navient, including capital market access, credit, interest rate and currency risks and reviewed with management steps to manage those risks.

Nominations and Governance Committee

In accordance with its charter, the Nominations and Governance Committee assisted the Board of Directors in establishing appropriate standards for the governance of Navient, the operations of the Board of Directors and the qualifications of directors during 2016. It has recommended to the Board of Directors the director nominees for the annual meeting of shareholders. The Nominations and Governance Committee also supervised the evaluation of the Board of Directors and reviewed and recommended changes to the Guidelines to the Board of Directors. In 2016, the Nominations and Governance Committee, in conjunction with the ExecutiveAudit Committee, it also oversaw a complete review ofreviews with management the committee chartersCompany’s quarterly earnings and the responsibilities and oversight duties of each committee. Additionally, in May of 2016, the Nominations and Governance Committee assisted in amending our Board Governance Guidelines to provide that no individual is eligible for nomination to the Board after the earlier to occur of (i) their 75th birthday or, (ii) after they have served more than 20 years on the Board.2 In accordance with the director tenure policy, we expect one incumbent non-employee director to retire from the

2Our Board Governance Guidelines state: “…individuals will not be nominated for election to the Board after the earlier to occur of (i) their 75th birthday or, (ii) beginning with nominations for election to the Board in 2018 and each year thereafter, after they have served more than 20 years on the Board or the boards of its predecessor companies (other than board service on the government sponsored enterprise, the Student Loan Marketing Association)”.

 (GRAPHIC)2017 Proxy Statement (GRAPHIC)23

Board in each of 2017, and 2018 and two non-employee directors in 2020. As our longest-tenured directors retire from the Board, we will continue our director recruitment efforts to help ensure that the size of the Board and the skills of the directors may be maintained. Each of the Committees’ charters is available atwww.navient.com under “Investors, Corporate Governance.” Shareholders may obtain a written copy of a committee charter by contacting the Corporate Secretary atcorporatesecretary@navient.comor Navient Corporation, 123 Justison Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801.press releases.

 

Compensation Consultant and Independence

 

During 2016,2020, the Compensation Committee retained Pearl Meyer as its independent compensation consultant (the “Compensation Consultant”).

 

The Compensation Consultant reported directly to the Compensation Committee, and the Compensation Committee retained authority to replace the Compensation Consultant or hire additional consultants at any time. A representative from the Compensation Consultant participated in meetings of the Compensation Committee and met with the committee without the presence of management, as requested, and directly communicated with the Chair of the Compensation Committee between meetings. However, the Compensation Committee made all decisions regarding the compensation paid to Navient’s named executive officers.

 

The Compensation Consultant provided various executive compensation services to the Compensation Committee pursuant to a written consulting agreement with the Compensation Committee. Generally, these services included advising the Compensation Committee on the principal aspects of Navient’s executive and director compensation programs, assisting in the selection of the compensation peer group, providing market information and analysis regarding the competitiveness of our compensation program design, reviewing Navient’s executive compensation disclosures, and informing the Committee about newemerging compensation-related regulatory and industry issues as they emerge.issues.

 

During 2016,2020, and again in 2017,2021, the Compensation Committee considered the independence of the Compensation Consultant in light ofunder SEC rules and Nasdaq listing standards. The Compensation Committee received a written statement of independence from the Compensation Consultant, which addressed the following factors: (1) other services provided to Navient by the Compensation Consultant; (2) fees paid by the Company as a percentage of the Compensation Consultant’s total revenues; (3) policies or procedures maintained by the Compensation Consultant that are designed to prevent a conflict of interest; (4) any business or personal relationships between the individual consultants involved in the engagement and any member of the Compensation Committee; (5) any Navient Common Stock owned by the individual consultants involved in the engagement; and (6) any business or personal relationships between our executive officers and the Compensation Consultant or the individual consultants involved in the engagement. The Compensation Committee discussed these considerations and concluded that the work of the Compensation Consultant did not raise any conflicts of interest. For more information on the Compensation Committee and the Compensation Consultant, please see the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section in this proxy statement.

 

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

 

Ms. Mills,Thompson, Mr. Klane, Ms. Lehman, Ms. Thompson3and Messrs. Munitz and WilliamsMr. Yowan were members of the Compensation and Personnel Committee at various times during fiscal year 2016.2020.3 All members of the Compensation Committee were independent directors, and no member was an employee or former employee of Navient or its affiliates. During fiscal year 2016,2020, none of Navient’s executive officers served on a compensation committee (or its equivalent) or board of directors of another entity whose executive officer served on the Compensation Committee.

 

 

3Ms. Thompson was appointed toMr. Yowan served on the Compensation and Personnel Committee onuntil May 25, 2016.20, 2020, when he became a member of the Audit Committee.

 

 (GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)20172021 Proxy Statement (GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)2426

 


 

The Board of Directors’ Role in Risk Oversight

 

 

TheOur Board of Directors has the ultimate responsibility for risk oversight under Navient’s Enterprise Risk Management (“ERM”) philosophy and framework. In carrying out this critical responsibility, the Board has designated the Risk Committee as having primary responsibility to assist the Board in the development, maintenance and governance of the company’s ERM policy, standards and program. Other standing committees of the Board are charged with overseeing specific enterprise risks, as described below. The Board and its standing committees oversee Navient’s overall strategic direction, including settingare responsible for ensuring we adhere to established risk management philosophy, tolerancetolerances and parameters that form a cornerstone of the company’s ERM framework.

The Board has delegated day-to-day responsibility for risk oversight to our Chief Executive Officer and establishing procedures for assessingsenior management team, who in turn have established the risksfollowing management committees to implement this directive: Enterprise Risk and Compliance Committee, Credit and Loan Loss Committee, Asset and Liability Committee, and Incentive Compensation Plan Committee. These internal management committees, described in more detail below, provide regular reports to the Board and its standing committees—either directly or through one or more senior executives. The overall risk governance structure is illustrated below:

The Nominations and Governance Committee regularly reviews the composition and membership of each business line,standing committee of the Board and makes recommendations to the Board. Outside of the SEC and Nasdaq requirements for eligibility to serve on certain committees, such as the Audit Committee and the Compensation and Personnel Committee, the Nominations and Governance Committee actively considers each committee’s responsibilities, as outlined in its charter, as well as the risk management practices the management team develops and utilizes. This risk management framework is reviewed periodically in light of the Company’s short- and long-term strategies and the major risks and issues facing the Company. Management escalates to the Board of Directors any significant departures from established tolerances and parameters and reviews new and emerging risks.individual director skillsets when deciding which directors will serve on specific standing committees.

Risk Appetite Framework

 

Navient employs a Risk Appetite Framework which definesto identify the most significant risks impactingthat could impact our business and provides athe process for evaluating and quantifying suchthose risks. Our The Risk Appetite Framework defines the type and degree of risk Navient is able and willing to assume, given its business objectives, contractual and other legal requirements, and obligations to stakeholders. As noted below, our Risk Appetite Framework segments enterprise risk into nine enterprise risk domains.

(GRAPHIC)2021 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)27


Enterprise Risk Committee is a management-led committee that monitors approved risk limits and thresholds to ensure our businesses are operating within approved risk parameters. Through ongoing monitoring of risk exposures, management endeavors to identify potential risks and develop appropriate responses and mitigation strategies. Domains

Our Risk Appetite Framework segments Navient’s enterprise risks across nine enterprise risk domains: (1) credit;Credit; (2) market;Market; (3) fundingFunding and liquidity;Liquidity; (4) compliance;Compliance; (5) legal;Legal; (6) operational;Operational; (7) reputational/political;Reputational and Political; (8) governance;Governance; and (9) strategy. Management escalates toStrategy. These risk domains are disclosed in our Form 10-K and proxy statements filed with the SEC. As noted above, our Board of Directors any significant departures from established tolerances and parameters and reviews new and emerging risks.has the ultimate responsibility for risk oversight for Navient’s ERM framework.

 

The Board has assigned oversight responsibility for each risk domain to one or more of Directors’ Risk Oversight Structureits standing committees. These risk oversight responsibilities are spelled out in each standing committee’s charter. Investors can find the charter of each committee on our website at https://www.navient.com/investors/corporate-governance/.

 

(FLOW CHART) Each of the enterprise risk domains is described below, along with the standing committee(s) responsible for risk oversight.

Enterprise Risk DomainBoard CommitteeRisk Description
CreditRisk CommitteeRisk resulting from an obligor's failure to meet the terms of any contract with the Company or otherwise fail to perform as agreed.
MarketRisk CommitteeRisk resulting from changes in market conditions, such as interest rates, spreads, commodity prices or volatilities.
Funding and LiquidityRisk CommitteeRisk arising from the Company's inability to meet its obligations when they come due without incurring unacceptable losses.
ComplianceAudit CommitteeRisk arising from violations of, or non-conformance with, laws, rules, regulations, prescribed practices, internal policies, and procedures, or ethical standards.
LegalAudit CommitteeRisk manifested by claims made through the legal system, including litigation brought against the Company. Legal risk may arise from a product, a transaction, a business relationship, property (real, personal, or intellectual), employee conduct, or a change in law or regulation.
OperationalRisk Committee Compensation and Personnel CommitteeRisk resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, personnel and systems, inadequate product design and testing, or from external events, including cybersecurity risk.
Reputational and PoliticalNominations and Governance CommitteeRisk from stakeholder perceptions regarding actual or alleged violations of law, our internal code of conduct or other employee misconduct.
GovernanceNominations and Governance CommitteeRisk of not establishing and maintaining a control environment that aligns with stakeholder and regulatory expectations, including tone at the top and board performance.
StrategicExecutive CommitteeRisk from adverse business decisions or improper implementation of business strategies.

 

Cyber-SecurityCybersecurity Risk Oversight

 

The Finance and OperationsBoard of Directors, through the Risk Committee, as part of its oversight responsibilities for cyber-security,plays an important role in overseeing the Company’s cybersecurity risk management. The Risk Committee receives regular briefings from the Company’s Chief Information Security Officer.Officer relating to the most recent developments in cybersecurity prevention, detection, response and recovery as well as updates on breaches and exploitations, both successful and unsuccessful, at other companies.

Additional Risk Oversight Information

Additional information about how we actively manage risk for our stakeholders, including our customers, clients, employees, and shareholders, can be found on the Governance Documents & Reports section of our website at https://www.navient.com/investors/corporate-governance/ in a report titled “Meeting Our Commitment: A Report on How Navient Manages Risk.”

(GRAPHIC)2021 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)28


 

Risk Assessment of Compensation Policies

 

 

Navient maintains an internal Incentive Compensation Plan Committee (the “ICP Committee”) that conducts an annual risk review and assessment of all the various incentive compensation plans covering our employees—including plans that cover our NEOs—named executive officers—to ensure that our employees are not incentedincentivized to take inappropriate risks which could impact our financial position and controls, reputation and operations. Our Chief Risk &and Compliance Officer, Chief Legal Officer, Chief

 (GRAPHIC)2017 Proxy Statement (GRAPHIC)25

Audit Officer and Chief Human Resources Officer serve on the ICP Committee, along with other senior business leaders. The ICP Committee presented its annual findings to a joint session of the Compensation Committee and the Audit Committee in early 2017,2021, and the Compensation Committee determined that the Company’s incentive compensation programs do not encourage or create unnecessary risk-taking, and that the risks arising from the programs are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. The ICP Committee will continue to monitor our incentive compensation plans, as well as the plan governance structure put in place to mitigate risks associated with the plans, to ensure that our incentive compensation practices properly incentincentivize our employees and reflect industry best practices.

 

Nominations Process

 

 

As described earlier in this proxy statement, the Board actively engages in succession planning and director recruiting to ensure that the size of the Board and the skills of the directors continue to align with our business strategy and the environment in which we operate. The Nominations and Governance Committee considers director candidates recommended by shareholders and also receives suggestions for candidates from Board members or third parties. The Nominations and Governance Committee has, from time to time, engaged and may alsocontinue, in the future, to engage third-party search firms to assist in identifying director candidates.

 

Candidates are evaluated based on the needs of the Board of Directors and Navient at that time, given the then-current mix of Board members, their individual skills and experiences relative to the Company’s business strategy, and the Nominations and Governance Committee’s desire to bring additional skills or experiences to the Board. While Navient does not have a formal Board diversity policy, the Board of Directors actively seeks representation that reflects gender, race, ethnic, age and geographic diversity, as reflected in the Guidelines.well as a diversity of perspectives and experience. The Nominations and Governance Committee, through its charter, is charged with reviewing the composition, skills and diversity of the Board of Directors, and as part of the process, the Nominations and Governance Committee incorporates into the Board of Directors’ annual evaluation process, the opportunity for each Board member to provide input regarding the current and desired composition of the Board of Directors and desired attributes of Board members. The minimum qualifications and attributes that the Nominations and Governance Committee believes a director nominee must possess include:

 

Knowledge of Navient’s business;

 

Proven record of accomplishment;

 

Willingness to commit the time necessary for Board of Director service;

 

Integrity and sound judgment in areas relevant to the business;judgment;

 

Willingness to represent the best interests of all shareholders and objectively appraiseeffectively oversee management performance;

 

Ability to challenge and stimulate management; and

 

Independence.

 

In addition, the Nominations and Governance Committee believes the Board of Directors collectively should encompass a mix of skills and expertise in the following areas:

 

Finance;Finance, including capital allocation;

 

Accounting/audit;

(GRAPHIC)2021 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)29


 

Corporate governance;

 

Executive leadership;

Information security and cyber-security;cybersecurity;

 

Financial services;

Business services, including financial technology and operations;innovation;

 

Capital markets;

 

Industry;Business operations and operating efficiency;

Mergers and acquisitions;

Higher education;

 

Consumer credit;

 

MarketingBusiness processing solutions and product development;outsourcing;

 

 (GRAPHIC)2017 Proxy Statement (GRAPHIC)26Consumer marketing and product development, including customer experience;

 

Government/Regulatory; and

 

Legal.

 

The Nominations and Governance Committee considers and evaluates candidates recommended by shareholders in the same manner that it considers and evaluates all other director candidates. In March of 2017, the Nominations and Governance Committee recommended the appointment of David L. Yowan to the Board of Directors to fill a vacancy. The Board of Directors approved the appointment of Mr. Yowan to the Board on March 30, 2017. To recommend a candidate, shareholders should send, in writing, the candidate’s name, credentials, contact information, and his or her consent to be considered as a candidate to the ChairmanChair of the Nominations and Governance Committee atcorporatesecretary@navient.com or c/o Corporate Secretary, Navient Corporation, 123 Justison Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801. The shareholder should also include his or her contact information and a statement of his or her share ownership. A shareholder wishing to nominate a candidate must comply with the notice and other requirements described under “Shareholder Proposals for the 20182022 Annual Meeting” in this proxy statement.

 

Proxy Access

The Company will include in its proxy statement and on its form of proxy card, the name of a director nominee submitted by an “Eligible Holder” who provides the information and satisfies the other provisions of the Company’s bylaws. To qualify as an “Eligible Holder,” a shareholder or a group of no more than 20 shareholders must have continuously owned at least three percent (3%) of the outstanding shares of the Company’s Common Stock entitled to vote in the election of directors for a period of at least three years and thereafter continue to own the shares through the Company’s annual meeting. There are no proxy access board nominees for the 2021 Annual Meeting. A complete version of the Company’s Second Amended and Restated Bylaws can be found on the Corporate Governance page of our website at the following location: https://www.navient.com/investors/corporate-governance/.

Director Orientation and Continuing Education

 

 

The Nominations and Governance Committee oversees the orientation of new directors and the ongoing education of the Board. As part of Navient’s director orientation program, new directors participate in one-on-one introductory meetings with Navient business and functional leaders and are given presentations by members of senior management on Navient’s strategic plans, financial statements and key issues, policies and practices. In addition, new directors receive education on their governance and director fiduciary duties.duties and expectations. Directors may enroll in director continuing education programs on corporate governance and critical issues associated with a director’s service on a public company board. Navient makes aan annual stipend available to each director to pay all or a portion oftowards the expenses of these programs. Our senior management meets regularly with the Board and meets annually to review with the Board the operating plan of the Company and each of our

(GRAPHIC)2021 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)30


strategic business groups. The Board also periodicallyregularly participates in sitefull Board educational programs and visits to Navient facilities.operation centers.

 

Shareholder EngagementOur Commitment to Environment, Social and Communications with the BoardGovernance (“ESG”) Matters

 

 

Our CEO, Chief Financial Officer,We recognize the importance of ESG matters to our investors. We have a long-standing commitment to the communities where we live and Vice Presidentwork, the environment, our employees, our customers and other stakeholders. Highlights of Investor Relations, together with other membersour commitment and approach to ESG matters are described below. Additional information appears on the About Us section of management, meet periodically with investors to discuss Navient’s strategy our website at https://about.navient.com and financial and business performance, and to update investorsin our Corporate Social Responsibility Report found on key developments. During 2016, Navient held meetings with over 200 investors and potential investors. In addition, we routinely seek our shareholders’ views on governance and compensation matters.website.

 

Shareholders and other interested parties may submit communications to the Board of Directors, the non-management directors as a group, the Chairman or any other individual member of the Board of Directors by contacting the Chairman of the Board in writing atcorporatesecretary@navient.com or c/o Corporate Secretary, Navient Corporation, 123 Justison Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801.Environment

 

In general,our facilities, we incorporate energy-efficient building support systems and corporate-sponsored recycling programs. Navient also is proactive in reducing travel-related emissions by providing video teleconferencing in its facilities, conference and training spaces. We make it easy for our millions of clients and customers to “go paperless” with us, reducing the Corporate Secretary forwards all such communicationsnatural resources needed to the Chairman. The Chairman in turn determines whether the communications should be forwarded to other members of the Boardprint and if so, forwards them accordingly. However, for communications addressed to a particular member of the Board, the Chair of a particular Board committee or the non-employee directors as a group, the Corporate Secretary forwards those communications directly to those individuals.mail hardcopy communications.

 

The directors have requestedOur Employees, Our Customers and Our Communities

We are committed to creating a workplace where employees are welcomed and respected for who they are as individuals. We believe that communicationsour employees and workplace thrive when we are authentically inclusive. We grow and innovate the best when we embrace a rich diversity that do not directly relatereflects the customers and communities we serve. We are committed to their dutieslisten, learn, and responsibilitiestake action against acts of inequity and injustice. Through our diversity, equity and inclusion strategy, our employees lead and participate in initiatives such as our directors be excluded from distribution. Such excluded items include “spam,” advertisements, mass mailings, form lettersInclusion & Diversity Council, employee resource teams, and email campaigns that involve unduly large numbersdiversity, equity and inclusion education and awareness campaigns. We provide education finance solutions to help people pursue higher education and successfully manage their finances. We have aided millions of similar communications, solicitations for goods, services, employment or contributions, surveyshouseholds on their path toward success. As a student loan servicer, we support people to successfully manage their student loan payments and individual product inquiries or complaints. Additionally, communications that appear to be unduly hostile, intimidating, threatening, illegal or similarly inappropriate will be screened for omission. Any omitted or deleted communications will be made available to any director upon request.build good credit. We also help federal student loan borrowers access federal benefits such as income-driven repayment, loan forgiveness and military benefits.

 

More than 400,000 student loan borrowers serviced by Navient pay off their student loans every year.

 (GRAPHIC)Navient-serviced federal student loan borrowers are 26% less likely to default than those serviced elsewhere.*

We have helped millions of borrowers enroll in income-driven repayment—including more than half of Navient-serviced student loan volume.

Since 2017, we also have refinanced more than $11 billion in student loans, helping borrowers save thousands through lower interest rates and accelerate their journey to successful repayment.

*Analysis of the FY 2017 Cohort Default Rate released by the U.S. Department of Education in 2020.

We support the communities where we live and work. Building on our focus to help people along the path to financial success, the Navient Community Fund supports organizations that address the root causes that limit financial success for all Americans. Our employees get involved in a variety of community activities such as distributing and reading books to kids, participating in blood drives, and collecting food and school supplies for families in need. We offer up to four hours of paid time off per month to empower employees to volunteer for a Navient-supported nonprofit organization in their community.

Governance

We are proud of our best-in-class governance practices—described in this proxy statement—and our commitment to diversity and inclusion. We’ve been recognized as a Champion of Board Diversity by the Forum of Executive Women and we’ve received a prestigious “W” award from the Women on Boards organization for the past four consecutive years.

(GRAPHIC)2021 Proxy Statement (GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)2731

 


 

Policy on Political Contributions, Disclosure and Oversight

 

 

We did not make any political contributions using corporate funds in 2016,2020, and we have no intention of making such political contributions in 2017.2021. The Company’sCompany's Government Relations Department ispersonnel are responsible for the development and implementation of policies pertaining to the Company’s political activities. It reports annuallyThey report semi-annually to the Nominations and Governance Committee of the Board on major lobbying priorities and principles. The Departmentprinciples as well as the political risk environment in which the Company operates. Government Relations also provides the Committee with a report on any payments made to trade associations, political expenditures, contributions made to other tax-exempt political organizations, as well as contributions by the Company’sCompany's Political Action Committee. In addition to the Government Relations Department, Navient also maintains numerous compliance processes structured to ensure that the Company and its employees conduct all their activities in accordance with our Code of Business Conduct and with all relevant laws governing political contributions and lobbying activities.

 

InSince 2016, we significantly expanded our disclosure of political activity and contributions through the publication ofhave published our Transparency in Policy Engagement and Political Participation Report. In 2018, the Company was recognized as a “Trendsetter” in the CPA-Zicklin Index for political transparency. The Report provides an overview of the Company’s legislative and political priorities and also provides details pertaining to Navient’s contributions to members of Congress, trade associations, 527 political organizations and other political organizations. The Nominations and Governance Committee has instructed the Company to update the report on a semi-annual basis. The current Report is available on the Company’s website athttps://www.navient.com/about/who-we-are/transparency/.

 

Code of Business Conduct

 

 

The Company has a Code of Business Conduct that applies to Board members and all employees, including the chief executive officer, the principalchief financial officer and the principal accounting officer. The Code of Business Conduct is available on the Company’s corporate governance website (at www.navient.comhttps://www.navient.com/investors/corporate-governance/ under “Investors, Corporate Governance”) and a written copy is available from the Corporate Secretary. The Company intends to post amendments to or waivers of the Code of Business Conduct (to the extent applicable to the Company’s chief executive officer, principalchief financial officer or principal accounting officer or any director) at this location on its website. There were no such amendments or waivers of the Code of Business Conduct during 2016.2020.

 

Policy on Review and Approval of Transactions with Related Parties

 

 

The Company has adopted a Policy on Related Party Transactions to ensure that all Interested Transactions with Related Parties, as those terms are defined in the policy, will be at arm’s length and on terms generally available to an unaffiliated third-party under the same or similar circumstances. The policy states that, except for the limited exceptions specifically stated in the policy, Interested Transactions with Related Parties that will exceed $120,000 in any calendar year must be reviewed by the Audit Committee and receive approval of the Board of Directors prior to the Corporation entering into the Interested Transaction. A copy of the policy is availablecan be found on the Company’s Corporate Governance website athttps://www.navient.com/about/investors/corp_governance/corporate-governance/. For additional information pertaining to Related Party Transactions, please refer to “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” below.

 

 (GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)20172021 Proxy Statement (GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)2832

 


 

Director Compensation

 

Our director compensation program is designed to reasonably compensate our non-employee directors for work required for a company of our size, complexity and risk, exposure, and to align the interests of our directors with those of our shareholders. The Compensation Committee reviews the compensation of our non-employee directors on an annual basis and makes recommendations to the Board.

 

In late 2015, theThe Compensation Committee, reviewed our director compensation with the assistance of the Compensation Consultant, and concludeddetermined that theour existing director compensation program should remain unchanged for 2016. That review utilized Navient’s 2016 Peer Group. The Compensation Committee revisited2020, with the exception of changes to the form of annual equity awards described below. Our 2020 director compensation program in late 2016 based on the Company’s 2017 Peer Group and determined that the program should be revised for 2017. The 2016 director compensation program, as well as changes to the program for 2017, are describedis detailed below.

 

Director Compensation Elements

 

 

The following table highlights the material elements of our 20162020 director compensation program:

 

20162020 Compensation ElementsCompensation Value
Annual Cash Retainer$100,000
Additional Cash Retainer for Independent ChairmanBoard Chair50,000
Additional Cash Retainer for Audit Committee Chair30,000
Additional Cash Retainer for Compensation and Personnel Committee Chair25,000
Additional Cash Retainer for Other Committee Chairs20,000
Annual Equity Award100,000130,000
Additional Equity Award for Independent ChairmanBoard Chair50,000
Meeting Fees (per meeting)1,500
Annual Maximum19,50065,000

 

Annual cash retainers are paid shortly after each annual meeting of shareholders.in quarterly installments as described below. Annual equity awards typically are granted in February each year in the form of restricted stock. These awards

Restricted stock granted to our non-employee directors in prior years was structured to vest only upon the recipient’s election to the Board at the Company’s next following annual meeting of shareholders (or, if earlier, upon death, disability, or a change in control).

For 2016, each of Beginning in 2020, the Board modified the vesting provisions incorporated in these equity awards to address the potential for partial-year Board service. Restricted stock granted to our non-employee directors alsoin February 2020 was paid $1,500 for every Board or committee meeting that he or she attended, subjectstructured to an annual aggregate maximum amount of $19,500 (which equates to 13 Board or committee meetings per year). This annual maximum is measured by reference to the twelve-month periodvest in quarterly increments beginning on the grant date, ofprovided the Company’s annual meeting of shareholders, which typically is held in May.

For 2017,director remains on the Board revised our director compensation program at the recommendation of the Committee to eliminate the payment of meeting fees asthrough each vesting date (with immediate vesting, if earlier, upon death, disability, or a separate category of compensation. Concurrently, the Board approved an increasechange in the annual equity award for our non-employee directors from $100,000 to $130,000, with the Board Chairman receiving an annual equity award of $195,000, to partially offset the elimination of the meeting fees component and, consistent with best practices, increase the proportion of compensation payable in equity. This is the first compensation increase for our non-employee directors since the Board was formed in connection with the 2014 spin-off from SLM Corporation.control). The Board also directed that annualmodified the quarterly payment dates for cash retainers be paid in four equal installments beginning in May 2017.to coincide with the new equity vesting dates.

 

We also reimburse each non-employee director for any out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with their service as a director. As described below, our non-employee directors may elect to defer all or a portion of their annual compensation under the Navient Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors.

 

Share Ownership Guidelines

 

 

We maintain share ownership guidelines for our non-employee directors. Under ourthese share ownership guidelines, each director is expected, within five years of his or her initial election to the Board of Directors, to own Navient Common Stock with a value equivalent to at least four times his or her annual cash retainer (excluding any additional cash or equity retainer or meeting fees).retainer. Currently, that minimum ownership amount is $400,000. The following shares and share units count towards the ownership guidelines: shares held in brokerage

 (GRAPHIC)2017 Proxy Statement (GRAPHIC)29

accounts; notional shares credited to deferred compensation accounts; restricted stock and restricted stock units (“RSUs”) that vest solely upon the passage of time; and vested stock options, to the extent that they are “in-the-money.”

 

All non-employee directors are in compliance with the share ownership guidelines as of the date of this proxy statement due to their share ownership amount or because the five-year period from their initial election has not ended.

 

(GRAPHIC)2021 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)33


Anti-Hedging and Pledging Policy

 

 

Navient’s Securities Trading Policy prohibits directors and officers (as defined by Rule 16a-1(f) of the Exchange Act and referred to as “Section 16 Officers”) from selling Navient stock short, holding Navient securities in a margin account, or pledging Navient securities as collateral for a loan or otherwise. Additionally, no director, Section 16 Officer or any other officer of the Company who is subject to the Company’s Stock Ownership Guidelines is permitted to enter into derivative or speculative transactions involving Navient securities (including prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars, credit default swaps and exchange funds) that are designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of Navient securities. All directors and named executive officers arewere in compliance with this policy throughout 2020 and remain in compliance as of the date of this proxy statement.

 

Policy on Rule 10b5-1 Trading Plans

 

 

The Company’s Securities Trading Policy governs the circumstances under which Navient directors and Section 16 Officers may enter into trading plans pursuant to SEC Rule 10b5-1 of the securities laws.10b5-1. Rule 10b5-1 trading plans are pre-established trading plans for sales of our Common Stock. We believe our Rule 10b5-1 policy is effective in ensuring compliance with legal requirements. Under the policy:

 

All Rule 10b5-1 trading plans must be pre-cleared by the Company’s Securities Trading Compliance Officer.

 

A trading plan may be entered into, modified or terminated only during an open trading window and while not in possession of material non-public information.

 

Once adopted, the person must not exercise any influence over the amount of securities to be traded, the price at which they are to be traded or the date of the trade.

 

Other Compensation

 

 

We provide non-employee directors with company-paid group life insurance, accidental death and disability and business travel accident insurance. We also provide current non-employee directors the opportunity to participate in the Company’s medical and dental plans. If a director elects to participate in these plans, the director pays the full cost of medical and dental coverage (which for an employee is normally shared by the Company and the employee). After retirement from the Board, a former non-employee director may continue medical coverage for up to 18 months under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA) at his/her own expense. The Independent Chairman is also entitled to reimbursement for office and transportation expenses commensurate with the amount of time he allocates to Board service.

 

Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors

 

 

Navient sponsors a deferred compensation plan for its non-employee directors. Under the Navient Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors (“Director Deferred Compensation Plan”), our non-employee directors may elect annually to defer receipt of all or a percentage of their annual cash retainer and/or meeting fees.retainer. In addition, directors may elect to forego all orreceive a portioncredit under the Director Deferred Compensation Plan in lieu of thetheir annual equity retainer that they would otherwise receive.retainer. Provided this election is made before the beginning of the year, the director’s plan account will be credited with ana dollar amount equivalent amountto the annual equity retainer and automatically invested in a notional Company stock fund. Notional stock units remain subject to the same vesting schedule applicable to the annual equity retainer.

 (GRAPHIC)2017 Proxy Statement (GRAPHIC)30

 

Deferrals are credited with earnings based on the performance of certain investment funds selected by the participant. The plan does not pay above-market or preferential earnings on amounts deferred. Deferrals invested in the notional Company stock fund are payable in shares of Navient Common Stock. All other deferrals are payable in cash (in a single lump sum or in installments at the election of the director) upon termination of the director’s service on the Board or after a minimum

(GRAPHIC)2021 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)34


number of years (except for hardship withdrawals in limited circumstances). As noted below, Ms. EscobedoBowen, Ms. Cabral, Mr. Diefenderfer,Klane, and Ms. Thompson and Mr. Williams each elected to defer all or a portion of his/her 20162020 compensation under the Director Deferred Compensation Plan.

 

Director Compensation Table

 

The tables below present information regarding the compensation and stock awards that we have paid or granted to the non-employee directors for the year ended December 31, 2016.2020.

 

 Fees Earned   
 or PaidStockAll Other 
 in Cash(1)Awards(2)Compensation(3)Total
Name($)($)($)($)
John K. Adams, Jr.139,50099,99748239,545
Ann Torre Bates(4)129,00099,99732229,029
Anna Escobedo Cabral(5)119,500100,00048219,548
William M. Diefenderfer, III(6)163,500150,00048313,548
Diane Suitt Gilleland119,50099,99748219,545
Katherine A. Lehman116,50099,99748216,545
Linda A. Mills144,50099,99748244,545
Barry A. Munitz136,50099,99748236,545
Steven L. Shapiro(7)099,997099,997
Jane J. Thompson(8)116,500100,00048216,548
Laura S. Unger146,50099,99748246,545
Barry L. Williams(9)116,500100,00048216,548
NameFees Earned
or Paid
in Cash(1)
($)
Stock
Awards(2)
($)
All Other
Compensation(3)
($)
Total
($)
Frederick Arnold100,000129,98791230,078
Marjorie L. Bowen(4)49,750130,00045179,795
Anna Escobedo Cabral(5)115,000130,00091245,091
Larry A. Klane(6)100,000130,00091230,091
Katherine A. Lehman120,000129,98791250,078
Linda A. Mills150,000194,98891345,079
Jane J. Thompson(7)125,000130,00091255,091
Laura S. Unger120,000129,98791250,078
David L. Yowan115,000129,98791245,078

 

(1)This table includes all fees earned or paid in fiscal year 2016.2020. Unless timely deferred 2016under the Director Deferred Compensation Plan, annual cash retainers wereare paid shortly after the Company’s 2016 annual meeting of shareholders. The annual limitationin quarterly installments on aggregate meeting fees noted in the text above is measured by reference to the twelve-month period beginning on the date of the Company’s annual meeting of shareholders rather than the Company’s fiscal year. Therefore, depending on the particular date when a director joins our Board or the timing of our meetings during the year, a director may receive more than $19,500 in meeting fees in a calendar year.around February 1st, May 1st, August 1st and November 1st.

 

(2)The grant date fair market value for each share of restricted stock granted in 20162020 to directors is based on the closing market price of the Company’s Common Stock on the grant date. Additional details on accounting for stock-based compensation can be found in “Note 2–Significant Accounting Policies” and “Note 11–Stock-Based Compensation Plans and Arrangements” to the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Grant date fair valuesStock awards are rounded down to the nearest whole share to avoid the issuance of fractional shares. As noted in the footnotes below, certain directors timely elected to forego their 2016 annual equity retainer and instead received an equivalentreceive a credit under the Director Deferred Compensation Plan thatin lieu of their 2020 annual equity retainer. Plan credits are automatically invested in a notional Company stock fund and are not subject to rounding for fractional shares. (3) All Other Compensation is detailed in a table on the following page.

(4)Ms. Bowen served on the Board in 2020 but did not stand for reelection at the 2020 Annual Meeting. Ms. Bowen’s compensation for 2020 reflects her partial tenure on the Board. Ms. Bowen timely elected to receive a credit under the Director Deferred Compensation Plan in lieu of her 2020 annual equity retainer, with the credit being automatically invested in a notional Company stock fund. One-half of this credit was forfeited when she left the Board in May 2020.

(5)Ms. Cabral timely elected to receive a credit under the Director Deferred Compensation Plan in lieu of her 2020 annual equity retainer, with the credit being automatically invested in a notional Company stock fund.

 

(3)(6)All OtherMr. Klane timely elected to receive a credit under the Director Deferred Compensation is set forthPlan in lieu of his 2020 annual equity retainer, with the table below:credit being automatically invested in a notional Company stock fund.

 

 Life 
 Insurance 
 Premiums(A)Total
Name($)($)
John K. Adams, Jr4848
Ann Torre Bates3232
Anna Escobedo Cabral4848
William M. Diefenderfer III4848
Diane Suitt Gilleland4848
Katherine A. Lehman4848
Linda A. Mills4848
(7)Ms. Thompson timely elected to receive a credit under the Director Deferred Compensation Plan in lieu of her 2020 annual equity retainer, with the credit being automatically invested in a notional Company stock fund.

 

 (GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)20172021 Proxy Statement (GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)3135


 

 Life 
 Insurance 
 Premiums(A)Total
Name($)($)
Barry A. Munitz4848
Steven L. Shapiro00
Jane J. Thompson4848
Laura S. Unger4848
Barry L. Williams4848
All Other Director Compensation: 
NameLife
Insurance
Premiums(A)
($)
Total
($)
Frederick Arnold9191
Marjorie L. Bowen4545
Anna Escobedo Cabral9191
Larry A. Klane9191
Katherine A. Lehman9191
Linda A. Mills9191
Jane J. Thompson9191
Laura S. Unger9191
David L. Yowan9191

 

(A)The amount reported is the annual premium paid by Navient to provide a life insurance benefit of up to $100,000.

 

(GRAPHIC)(4)2021 Proxy StatementMs. Bates resigned from the Board effective August 16, 2016.(GRAPHIC)36

 

(5)Ms. Escobedo Cabral timely elected to forego her 2016 annual equity retainer and instead received an equivalent credit under the Director Deferred Compensation Plan that was automatically invested in a notional Company stock fund.

(6)Mr. Diefenderfer timely elected to forego his 2016 annual equity retainer and instead received an equivalent credit under the Director Deferred Compensation Plan that was automatically invested in a notional Company stock fund.

(7)Mr. Shapiro retired from the Board on May 26, 2016, and he forfeited the stock award reflected in the table above which he had received earlier in the year.

(8)Ms. Thompson timely elected to forego her 2016 annual equity retainer and instead received an equivalent credit under the Director Deferred Compensation Plan that was automatically invested in a notional Company stock fund.

(9)Mr. Williams timely elected to forego his 2016 annual equity retainer and instead received an equivalent credit under the Director Deferred Compensation Plan that was automatically invested in a notional Company stock fund. He also elected to defer his annual meeting fees under the Director Deferred Compensation Plan.

 (GRAPHIC)2017 Proxy Statement (GRAPHIC)32


 

Proposal 2 — Ratification of the Appointment of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

Navient’s independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP (“KPMG”), is selected by the Audit Committee. On February 23, 2017,24, 2021, the Audit Committee engaged KPMG as Navient’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017.2021. Representatives of KPMG are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting and they will have the opportunity to respond to appropriate questions from shareholders and to make a statement if they desire to do so.

 

This proposal is put before the shareholders because the Board of Directors believes it is a good corporate governance practice to ask shareholders to ratify the selection of the independent registered public accounting firm.

 

For ratification, this proposal requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the Common Stock present, represented and entitled to vote, and voting affirmatively or negatively at the Annual Meeting. Accordingly, shares that are not voted affirmatively or negatively with respect to this proposal, including abstentions and broker non-votes, will not be relevant to the outcome. If the appointment of KPMG is not ratified, the Audit Committee will evaluate the basis for the shareholders’ vote when determining whether to continue the firm’s engagement. Even if the selection of Navient’s independent registered public accounting firm is ratified, the Audit Committee may direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during 20172021 if, in its discretion, it determines that such a change would be in the Company’s best interests.

 

Board Recommendation

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR“FOR” RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF KPMG AS NAVIENT’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2017.2021.

 

 (GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)20172021 Proxy Statement (GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)3337

47


 

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms for 20162020 and 20152019

 

 

Aggregate fees billed for services performed for Navient by its independent accountant, KPMG, for the fiscal years ended December 31, 20162020, and 2015,2019, are set forth below.

 

 20162015
Audit Fees$3,451,165$3,043,614
Audit-Related Fees2,006,4751,908,014
Tax Fees*738,358796,252
All Other Fees45,823
Total$6,195,998$5,793,702

*Tax fees for 2016 do not include certain amounts paid by Navient to SLM Corporation (“SLM”) pursuant to a Tax Sharing Agreement dated April 28, 2014 between Navient and SLM, which required Navient to reimburse SLM for certain payments paid to KPMG on Navient’s behalf. In 2016, Navient reimbursed SLM $534,342 for such payments. Additional information concerning the Tax Sharing Agreement and other agreements between SLM and Navient can be found in this proxy statement under the heading “Certain Relationships and Transactions”.
  2020  2019 
Audit Fees $4,482,366  $4,132,351 
Audit-Related Fees $1,131,113  $1,021,909 
Tax Fees $441,321  $378,881 
All Other Fees  -   - 
Total $6,054,800  $5,533,141 

 

Audit Fees.Audit fees include fees for professional services rendered for the audits of the consolidated financial statements of Navient and statutory and subsidiary audits, issuance of comfort letters, consents, income tax provision procedures, and assistance with review of documents filed with the SEC.

Audit-Related Fees.Audit-related fees include fees for assurance and other services related to service provider compliance reports, trust servicing and administration reports, internal control reviews, and attest services that are not required by statute or regulation.

Tax Fees.Tax fees include fees for federal and state tax compliance, and tax consultation services.

 

Pre-approval Policies and Procedures

 

  

The Audit Committee has a policy that addresses the approval of audit and non-audit services to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm to the Company. The policy requires that all services to be provided by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm be pre-approved by the Audit Committee or its Chair. Each approval of the Audit Committee or the Chair of the Audit Committee must describe the services provided and set a dollar limit for the services. The Audit Committee, or its Chair, pre-approved all audit and non-audit services provided by KPMG during 2016.2020. Reporting is provided to the Audit Committee regarding services that the Chair of the Audit Committee pre-approved between committee meetings. The Audit Committee receives regular reports from management regarding the actual provision of all services by KPMG. No services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm were approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to the “de minimis” exception to the pre-approval requirement set forth in paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.

 

 (GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)20172021 Proxy Statement (GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)3438

48


 

Report of the Audit Committee

 

The following report shall not be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the federal securities laws by virtue of any general incorporation of this proxy statement by reference and shall not otherwise be treated as filed under the federal securities laws.

 

The Audit Committee is responsible for monitoring our financial reporting processes and system of internal controls, supervising our internal auditors and overseeing the independence and performance of the independent auditors. In carrying out these responsibilities, the Audit Committee meets, on a regular basis, with our internal auditors and our independent auditors to review the overall scope and plans for their respective audits of our financial statements. The Audit Committee also meets privately (and in separate meetings) with members of management, our independent auditors and our internal auditors as may otherwise be needed. The Audit Committee meets with management and with the independent auditors each quarter to review and discuss our Annual Report on Form 10-K and ourthe Company’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q prior to their being filed with the SEC. ItSEC and annually to review and discuss the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Committee also meets with management and our independent auditors to review and discuss ourthe Company’s quarterly earnings prior to theirreview by the Executive Committee and public release.

 

The Audit Committee’s responsibility is to monitor and oversee the audit and financial reporting processes. However, the members of the Audit Committee are not practicing certified public accountants or professional auditors and rely, without independent verification, on the information provided to them and on the representations made by management, and the report issued by the independent registered public accounting firm. While the Audit Committee and the Board monitor the Company’s financial record-keeping and controls, management is ultimately responsible for the Company’s financial reporting process, including its system of internal controls, disclosure control procedures and the preparation of the financial statements. The independent auditors support the financial reporting process by performing an audit of the Company’s financial statements and issuing a report thereon.

 

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with management and Navient’s independent registered accounting firm, KPMG LLP, the Company’s audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016.2020. The Audit Committee also discussed with KPMG LLP the matters under Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) standards, including among other things, matters relatedthose relating to the conduct of the audit of our financial statements.

 

The Audit Committee received, reviewed and revieweddiscussed with KPMG LLP the written disclosures and the letter from KPMG LLP(as required by applicable requirements of the PCAOBPCAOB) regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed with KPMG LLPabout the firm’s independence.

 

Based on thethese reviews and discussions, referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the financial statements referred to above be included in the Company’s2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016,2020, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

Audit Committee

 

David L. Yowan, Chair

Frederick Arnold

Anna Escobedo Cabral

Laura S. Unger Chair
John K. Adams, Jr.
Anna Escobedo Cabral
Diane Suitt Gilleland
David L. Yowan

 

 (GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)20172021 Proxy Statement (GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)3539

49


 

Ownership of Common Stock

 

The following table provides information, as of February 28, 2017,March 1, 2021, about each shareholder known to Navient to beneficially own more than five percent of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock, based solely on the information filed by each such shareholder on Schedules 13D or 13G with the SEC on the dates indicated in the footnotes to this table (percentages are calculated assuming continuous beneficial ownership at February 28, 2017)March 23, 2021).

 

Name and Address of Beneficial OwnerSharesPercent
   
The Vanguard Group, Inc.(1)37,688,03312.95%
100 Vanguard Blvd.  
Malvern, PA 19355  
   
   
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss, LLC(2)32,007,56811.00%
2200 Ross Avenue, 31st Floor  
Dallas, TX 75201-2761  
   
   
Boston Partners(3)28,171,3259.68%
One Beacon Street 30th Floor  
Boston, MA 02108  
   
   
BlackRock Inc.(4)21,449,5527.37%
40 East 52nd Street  
New York, NY 10022  
   
   
State Street Corporation(5)16,155,6735.54%
One Lincoln Street  
Boston, MA 02111  
   
Name and Address of Beneficial OwnerSharesPercent
BlackRock Inc. (1)21,362,88311.5%
40 East 52nd Street  
New York, NY 10022  
The Vanguard Group, Inc. (2)20,057,12610.77%
100 Vanguard Blvd.  
Malvern, PA 19355  
   
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP (3)13,537,7247.3%
Building One  
6300 Bee Cave Road  
Austin, TX 78746  

 

(1)This information is based on the Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC by BlackRock, Inc. on January 27, 2021. BlackRock, Inc. has sole power to vote or direct the voting of 20,959,107 shares of Common Stock and has sole power to dispose of or direct the disposition of 21,362,883 shares of Common Stock.

(2)This information is based on the Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC by The Vanguard Group, Inc., on February 10, 2017.2021. The Vanguard Group, Inc., directly and through its subsidiaries, has sole power to vote or direct the voting of 493,412 shares of Common Stock, shared voting power of 71,930193,275 shares, sole power to dispose of or direct the disposition of 37,143,38819,681,279 shares of Common Stock, and shared power to dispose of or direct the disposition of 544,645 shares of Common Stock. According to this Schedule 13G/A, Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Vanguard Group, Inc., beneficially owns 397,315 shares of Common Stock; and Vanguard Investments Australia, Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Vanguard Group, Inc., beneficially owns 243,247 shares of Common Stock.

(2)This information is based on the Schedule 13G filed with the SEC by Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss, LLC on February 9, 2017. Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss, LLC has sole power to vote or direct the vote for 7,574,322 shares of Common Stock, shared power to vote or to direct the vote for 24,433,246 shares of Common Stock and sole power to dispose or to direct the disposition of 32,007,568375,847 shares of Common Stock.

 

(3)This information is based solely on the Schedule 13G filed with the SEC by Boston PartnersDimensional Fund Advisors LP on February 10, 2017. Boston Partners has sole power16, 2021. Dimensional Fund Advisors LP, an investment adviser registered under Section 203 of the Investment Advisors Act of 1940, furnishes investment advice to votefour investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, and serves as investment manager or directsub-adviser to certain other commingled funds, group trusts and separate accounts (such investment companies, trusts and accounts, collectively referred to as the vote for 28,185,474 shares of Common Stock, shared power to vote or to direct the vote for 77,983 shares of Common Stock and sole power to dispose or to direct the disposition of 28,171,325 shares of Common Stock.

(4)This information is based on the Schedule 13G filed with the SEC by BlackRock, Inc. on January 27, 2016. BlackRock, Inc. has“Funds”). The Funds directly have sole power to vote or direct the voting of 18,733,98413,154,014 shares of Common Stock, and has sole power to dispose of or direct the disposition of for 21,449,55213,537,724 shares of Common Stock.

 

(GRAPHIC)(5)2021 Proxy StatementThis information is based on the Schedule 13G filed with the SEC by State Street Corporation on February 7, 2017. State Street Corporation has shared power to vote or direct the vote for 16,155,673 shares of Common Stock and shared power to dispose or to direct the disposition of 16,155,673 shares of Common Stock.(GRAPHIC)40

 

 (GRAPHIC)2017 Proxy Statement (GRAPHIC)36

50


 

Ownership of Common Stock by Directors and Executive Officers

 

The following table sets forth information concerning the beneficial ownership of Navient’s Common Stock by: (i) our current directors and director nominees; (ii) the named executive officers listed in the Summary Compensation Table;Table (other than Mr. Lown, who resigned from the Company in May 2020); and (iii) all of the Company’s current directors and executive officers as a group. Under SEC rules, beneficial ownership for purposes of this table takes into account stock as to which the individual has or shares voting and/or investment power as well as stock that may be acquired within 60 days (such as by exercising vested stock options). Information is provided as of February 28, 2017.March 3, 2021. The beneficial owners listed have sole voting and investment power with respect to stock beneficially owned, except as to the interests of spouses or as otherwise indicated. As of February 28, 2017,March 3, 2021, there were 289,444,035181,836,082 shares of our Common Stock issued, outstanding and entitled to vote.

 

   Total 
   BeneficialPercent of
Director Nominees(1)Shares(2)Vested Options(3)Ownership(4)Class
John K. Adams, Jr.26,59426,594*
Anna Escobedo Cabral(5)26,53126,531*
William M. Diefenderfer III(6)154,531154,531*
Diane Suitt Gilleland(7)130,04141,278171,319*
Katherine A. Lehman29,09429,094*
Linda A. Mills(8)30,74130,741*
Barry A. Munitz70,22021,52391,743*
Jane J. Thompson(9)31,13131,131*
Laura S. Unger(10)26,99126,991*
Barry Lawson Williams(11)63,03915,30178,340*
     
Named Executive Officers    
Jack Remondi(12)1,464,6551,335,8492,800,504*
Somsak Chivavibul(13)328,62853,191381,819*
John Kane(14)343,25354,336397,589*
Jeff Whorley(15)200,16235,224235,386*
Timothy Hynes(16)214,99088,118303,108*
Directors and Officers(17) as a Group (16 Persons)3,285,5811,644,8204,930,4011.68%
        Total    
        Beneficial  Percent of 
Director Nominees Shares (1)  Vested Options (2)  Ownership (3)  Class 
Frederick Arnold  45,948   -   45,948   * 
Anna Escobedo Cabral(4)  81,217   -   81,217   * 
Larry A. Klane(5)  22,643   -   22,643   * 
Katherine A. Lehman  70,462   -   70,462   * 
Linda A. Mills  98,568   -   98,568   * 
Jane J. Thompson(6)  77,284   -   77,284   * 
Laura S. Unger(7)  69,078   -   69,078   * 
David L. Yowan(8)  51,849   -   51,849   * 

Named Executive Officers                
Jack Remondi(9)  3,075,995   231,513   3,307,508   1.80%
Joe Fisher(10)  84,374   -   84,374   * 
John Kane(11)  561,101   75,699   636,800   * 
Mark Heleen(12)  341,678   -   341,678   * 
Steve Hauber(13)  195,578   40,473   236,051   * 
Ted Morris(14)  109,108   25,533   134,641   * 
                 
Directors and Current Officers as a Group (14 Persons)  4,884,883   373,218   5,258,101   2.85%

 

*Less than one percent.percent

 

(1)David L. Yowan was appointed to Board after February 28, 2017, and therefore is not included in this table.

(2)Shares of Common Stock and stock units held directly or indirectly, including vested deferred stock units and unvested deferred stock units that may vest within 60 days of March 3, 2021, credited to Company-sponsored retirement and deferred compensation plans. Totals for named executive officers include (i) restricted stock units (“RSUs”) that vest and are converted into shares only upon the passage of time, (ii) performance stock units (“PSUs”) that vest and are converted into shares upon the satisfaction of pre-established performance conditions, and (iii) associated dividend equivalent units (“DEUs”) issued on outstanding RSUs and PSUs. The individuals holding such RSUs, PSUs and DEUs have no voting or investment power over these units.

 

(3)(2)Shares that may be acquired within 60 days of February 28, 2017,March 3, 2021, through the exercise of stock options. AllThe stock options held by our officers are net-settled pursuant to their terms (i.e., shares are withheld upon exercise to cover the aggregate exercise price, and the net resulting shares are delivered to the option holder). StockNet-settled stock options therefore are shown on a “spread basis,” with out-of-the-money options shown as 0.

 

(4)(3)Total of columns 1 and 2. Except as otherwise indicated and subject to community property laws, each owner has sole voting and sole investment power with respect to the shares listed.

 

(4)For Ms. Cabral, 32,056 shares are deferred stock units credited to a Company-sponsored deferred compensation plan account.

(5)19,819For Mr. Klane, 15,301 shares are deferred stock units credited to a Company-sponsored deferred compensation plan account.

 

(6)53,804For Ms. Thompson, 71,023 shares are deferred stock units credited to a Company-sponsored deferred compensation plan account.

 

(7)24,371For Ms. Unger, 24,852 shares are deferred stock units credited to a Company-sponsored deferred compensation plan account.

 

(8)5,050For Mr. Yowan, 11,477 shares are deferred stock units credited to a Company-sponsored deferred compensation plan account.

 

(GRAPHIC)(9)2021 Proxy Statement24,870 shares are deferred stock units credited to a Company-sponsored deferred compensation plan account.(GRAPHIC)41

 

 (GRAPHIC)2017 Proxy Statement (GRAPHIC)37

51


 

(10)5,050 shares are deferred stock units credited to a Company-sponsored deferred compensation plan account.

(11)24,870 shares are deferred stock units credited to a Company-sponsored deferred compensation plan account.

(12)(9)Mr. Remondi’s share ownership includes 250 shares held as custodian for his child. 627,6921,108,346 of the shares reported in this column are RSUs, PSUs or DEUs over which Mr. Remondi has no voting or dispositive control.

 

(13)(10)Mr. Chivavibul’s share ownership includes 2,098 shares held by his spouse. 160,40566,186 of the shares reported in this column are RSUs, PSUs, or DEUs over which Mr. ChivavibulFisher has no voting or dispositive control.

 

(14)(11)225,882213,552 of the shares reported in this column are RSUs, PSUs or DEUs over which Mr. Kane has no voting or dispositive control. 1,0801,358 shares are deferred stock units credited to a Company-sponsored deferred compensation plan account.

 

(15)(12)186,521158,823 of the shares reported in this column are RSUs, PSUs or DEUs over which Mr. WhorleyHeleen has no voting or dispositive control.

 

(16)(13)148,535106,775 of the shares reported in this column are RSUs, PSUs or DEUs over which Mr. HynesHauber has no voting or dispositive control.

 

(17)(14)Christian Lown joined75,952 of the Company after February 28, 2017, and therefore is not includedshares reported in this table.column are RSUs, PSUs or DEUs over which Mr. Morris has no voting or dispositive control.

 

 (GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)20172021 Proxy Statement (GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)3842

52


 

Executive Officers

 

Our executive officers are appointed annually by the Board of Directors. The following sets forth biographical information concerning Navient’s executive officers who are not directors. Biographical information for Mr. Remondi is included in Proposal 1 — Election of Directors.

 

Name and AgePosition and Business Experience
  
Christian LownJoe Fisher
41
● Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer, Navient — March 2017October 2020 to present
47●   Managing Director and Co-Head, Global Financial Technology Group, North America Diversified Finance, Morgan Stanley — 2006 to February 2017
 ● Vice President Financial Institutions Groupof Investor Relations and Corporate Development, NavientUBS AG — 2003April 2018 to 2006October 2020
 Associate, Financial Institutions Group, Credit Suisse First BostonVice President of Investor Relations, Navient2001May 2014 to 2003April 2018
  
John Kane● Group President, Asset Recovery and Business Services,Processing Solutions, Navient — June 2015 to present
4852● Chief Operating Officer, Navient — April 2014 to June 2015
 ● Senior Vice President — Enterprise Project Management, SLM Corporation — March 2013 to April 2014
 ● Senior Vice President — Credit, SLM Corporation — August 2011 to March 2013
 ● Senior Vice President — Collections, SLM Corporation — 2008 to 2011
 ● Senior Vice President — Consumer Credit Operations, MBNA/Bank of America — 1990 to 2008
  
Jeff Whorley●   Group President, Asset Management and Servicing, Navient — June 2015 to present
55●   Founder & Chief Executive Officer, Core Principal, Inc. — 2013 to June 2015
●   President, Student Aid Services, Inc. — 2009 to 2012
●   Executive Vice President, Debt Management Services, SLM Corporation — 2003 to 2007
Somsak Chivavibul●   Chief Decision Management Officer, Navient — March 2017 to present
50●   Chief Financial Officer, Navient — April 2014 to March 2017
●   Senior Vice President — Financial Planning & Analysis, SLM Corporation — May 2007 to April 2014
●   Vice President — Financial Planning & Analysis, SLM Corporation — 2003 to 2007
●   Managing Director — Financial Planning & Analysis, SLM Corporation — 1997 to 2003
●   Treasurer, Student Loan Marketing Association — 1997 to 2003
Mark L. Heleen● Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary, Navient — February 2015 to present
5458● Senior Vice President and Senior Deputy General Counsel, Navient — June 2014 to February 2015
 ● Senior Attorney, Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP — August 2013 to June 2014
 ● Independent Consultant — January 2011 to August 2013
 ● Executive Vice President and General Counsel, SLM Corporation — February 2009 to December 2010
 ● Various roles within the Office of the General Counsel, SLM Corporation — July 19881998 to February 2009
  
Timothy HynesSteve Hauber● Chief Risk &and Compliance Officer, Navient — April 2014June 2017 to present
47Senior Vice PresidentChief Audit Officer, NavientCollections,April 2014 to June 2017
● Chief Audit Officer, SLM Corporation — OctoberJanuary 2011 to April 2014

(GRAPHIC)●   Senior Vice President — Credit, SLM Corporation — May 2008 to October 2011
2021 Proxy Statement●   Senior Vice President — Consumer Lending, Bank of America Card Services — 1993 to 2008(GRAPHIC)43

 

(GRAPHIC)2017 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)39

53


 

Proposal 3 — Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

 

Navient is asking shareholders to approve an advisory resolution (commonly referred to as a “say-on-pay” resolution) on the Company’s executive compensation as reported in this proxy statement. Navient urges shareholders to read the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this proxy statement, which describes how the Company’s executive compensation policies and procedures operate and are designed, as well as the Summary Compensation Table and other related compensation tables and narrative, which provide detailed information on the compensation paid to our named executive officers (“NEOs”).

 

This proposal gives you, as a shareholder, the opportunity to express your views on our NEOs’ compensation. Your vote is not intended to address any specific item of our compensation program, but rather to address our overall approach to and objectives of the compensation paid to our NEOs as described in this proxy statement. In accordance with Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), Navient is asking shareholders to approve the following advisory resolution at the Annual Meeting:

 

“Resolved, that Navient’s shareholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the related compensation tables and narrative disclosure in this proxy statement.”

 

The Company conducted a similarconducts its advisory vote on executive compensation at our lasteach annual meeting of its shareholders. At that time,each of our last five annual meetings, beginning in 2016, our shareholders have expressed their overwhelming support for the 2015our executive compensation of our NEOs, with approximately 97.7% of the votes present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the matter cast to approve the 2015 compensation of our NEOs.programs:

image 

 

The Board of Directors believes that the Company’s 20162020 executive compensation program strongly alignsaligned pay to actual performance. Navient’s performance in 2016 improved significantly over 2015 on a number of difference fronts, and that performance is directly reflected in the compensation paid to our NEOs for 2016. The Company’s 2016 financial performance resulted in above-target incentive payments under our annual incentive plan. Specifically, each of our NEOs received 111.1% of the target annual incentive due to the Company’s financial performance during 2016. Additionally, the value of outstanding equity awards granted to our NEOs in early 2016 increased due to an increase in the value of our Common Stock. Stock options granted to our NEOs in February 2016 with an exercise price of $9.18 were in-the-money at the end of 2016, and Restricted Stock Units granted on the same date similarly increased in value. Shareholders are encouraged to read the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section, which describes Navient’s executive compensation program in detail, including how it is designed to achieve the Company’s compensation objectives and how the Company’s performance in 20162020 was reflected in the compensation of our NEOs.

 

This proposal to approve the resolution regarding the compensation paid to Navient’s NEOs requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the Common Stock present, represented and entitled to vote, and voting affirmatively or negatively at the Annual Meeting. Accordingly, shares that are not voted affirmatively or negatively with respect to this proposal, including abstentions and broker non-votes, will not be relevant to the outcome.

 

As an advisory vote, the “say-on-pay” resolution is not binding on Navient. The Board of Directors, however, values the opinions of our shareholders as expressed through their votes and other communications.votes. Accordingly, the Board of Directors as well as the Compensation Committee will review and consider the results of the “say-on-pay” vote, the opinions of our shareholders, and other relevant factors in making future decisions regarding our executive compensation program.

 

Board Recommendation

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR“FOR” THE APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE COMPENSATION PAID TO OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AS DISCLOSED IN THE COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS AND THE RELATED COMPENSATION TABLES AND NARRATIVE DISCLOSURE IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.

 

(GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)20172021 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)4044

 

54


 

Executive Compensation

 

Compensation and Personnel Committee Report

 

The following report shall not be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the federal securities laws by virtue of any general incorporation of this proxy statement by reference and shall not otherwise be treated as filed under the federal securities laws.

 

The Compensation and Personnel Committee of the Board of Directors has reviewed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K and discussed it with the Company’s management, and based on its review and discussions with management, the Compensation and Personnel Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20162020, and this proxy statement.

 

Compensation and Personnel Committee

 

LindaJane J. Thompson, Chair

Larry A. Mills, Chair
Klane

Katherine A. Lehman
Barry A. Munitz
Jane J. Thompson
Barry L. Williams

 

(GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)20172021 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)4145

 

55


  

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

 

 

Introduction

 

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) provides information regarding our executive compensation guiding principles, the elements of our executive compensation program, the factors that were considered in making compensation decisions for our “named executive officers” or “NEOs” in 2016,2020, and how we have modified our programs to meet Navient’s needs in the future.

 

Navient’s Compensation and Personnel Committee (the “Compensation Committee” or simply the “Committee”) is responsible for establishing and overseeing our executive compensation program, including the program’s underlying philosophy, objectives and related policies. The Committee is composed of Ms. MillsThompson (Chair), Mr. Klane and Ms. Lehman, Mr. Munitz, Ms. Thompson and Mr. Williams. Until his retirement in May 2016, Mr. Shapiro also served as a member of the Committee.Lehman.

 

This CD&A presents information for the following Navient NEOs:

 

Jack Remondi, President and Chief Executive Officer

 

Somsak Chivavibul,Joe Fisher, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer*

 

John Kane, Group President, Asset Recovery and Business ServicesProcessing Solutions

 

Jeff Whorley, Group President, Asset ManagementMark Heleen, Chief Legal Officer and ServicingSecretary

 

Tim Hynes,Steve Hauber, Chief Risk &and Compliance Officer

 

Ted Morris, Controller; Former Acting Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer**

Chris Lown, Former Chief Financial Officer***

* Mr. ChivavibulFisher was appointed as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer effective October 7, 2020.

** Mr. Morris served as Acting Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer from June 1, 2020 until October 6, 2020, and currently serves as Controller. 

*** Mr. Lown served as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer throughout 2016. Effective March 27, 2017, Christian Lown became the Company’s Chief Financialand Principal Accounting Officer and Mr. Chivavibul assumed a new role overseeing the Company’s decision management center.until May 29, 2020.

2021 Proxy Statement46
56

 

Executive Summary

 

Navient’s executive compensation program emphasizes the link between pay and performance, aligning the compensation of our executives with the interests of our shareholders. Our executive compensation program balances annual and long-term performance measures, including a mix of financial, operational and strategic goals that promote effective management of our legacy loan portfolio, improvements and growth in our consumer lending business, profitable growth in our business services segment and expense control. Individual performance goals also are established for each of our NEOs. This section summarizes Navient’s performance in 20162020 and the impact of that performance on the compensation paid to our NEOs.

 

Navient’s 2020 Performance

2020 was an extraordinarily challenging year in which Navient demonstrated resilience in the face of a global pandemic, ingenuity and determination to meet new needs, and commitment to our colleagues and customers. Our 2020 performance highlights include the following:

We Delivered Strong EPS Performance: Adjusted Diluted “Core Earnings” Per Share4 grew 29% from the prior year and our three-year Adjusted Diluted “Core Earnings” Per Share grew at a compound annual growth rate of 28%.

We Continued to Grow Our Consumer Lending Business: We originated $4.6 billion in private education refinance loans, despite the uncertain economic environment related to COVID-19, and continued to carefully manage the credit risk of our portfolio through rigorous underwriting, high-quality servicing and risk mitigation practices.

We Expanded Our Business Processing Offerings Into New Markets: In 2020 we supported states in providing unemployment benefits, COVID-19 contact tracing and vaccine coordination services, which led to strong growth in our business processing segment. We successfully redeployed existing employees and hired over 1,000 new employees to support these efforts.

We Implemented Innovative Financing Strategies to Reduce Our Interest Expense and Maintain Strong Levels of Liquidity: We retired all of our 2020 debt maturities and called $800 million of our future unsecured notes. In addition, we issued $700 million of unsecured debt at attractive spreads.

We Rapidly Deployed COVID-19 Related Student Loan Relief: We quickly implemented the student loan relief provisions of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) which apply only to loans owned by the U.S. Department of Education. We also extended relief options such as the use of forbearance to borrowers with FFELP and private education loans.

We Supported the Health, Well-being and Safety of Our Employees and Communities: We responded to the developing COVID-19 pandemic by rapidly moving nearly 90% of our employees to work-from-home arrangements—avoiding the widespread layoffs and furloughs experienced in some industries—and we implemented education, social distancing and safety regimens for those employees who continued to work on-site, all while sustaining customer service, productivity and quality levels.

We Promoted Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) in Our Workplace: We launched a multi-year DEI strategy in 2018 to strengthen leadership commitment, enhance the employee experience and mindfulness, institute sustainability measures such as employee focus groups, and measure key performance indicators. Our employees lead and participate in DEI initiatives such as our Inclusion & Diversity Council, employee resource teams, and DEI education and awareness campaigns. We also look to promote diversity within our management team—in terms of gender, race, ethnicity, perspective and other factors—as part of the management succession planning process and in recruitment, promotion and retention opportunities at all levels of the Company.

Navient’s 2020 Compensation Decisions

Based on the Committee’s review of Navient’s strong 2020 performance, and after considering the appropriate alignment with shareholders, employees and other stakeholders, the Committee did not make any changes to our incentive plan goals

4 Adjusted Diluted “Core Earnings” Per Share excludes net restructuring and regulatory-related charges, as well as certain extraordinary items such as strategic corporate transactions or other unusual or unplanned events. Adjusted Diluted “Core Earnings” Per Share is a non-GAAP financial measure that does not represent a comprehensive basis of accounting. For a reconciliation of our non-GAAP financial measures with GAAP results, please refer to the section titled “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” on pages 35-43 of our 2020 Annual Report filed on Form 10-K on February 26, 2020, or refer to the Investor Relations section of our website located at https://www.navient.com/investors/.

Key Accomplishments in 2016: 2021 Proxy Statement47
57

or payouts to offset the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. Highlights of our 2020 compensation decisions are discussed below, with additional details in this CD&A.

Improved Earnings2020 Base Salaries: Base salaries remained unchanged from 2019 for our CEO, Mr. Remondi, and Messrs. Kane, Heleen, Hauber and Lown. Base salaries for Messrs. Fisher and Morris were established at the time they assumed their new roles during 2020. Base salaries for each of our NEOs are described on page 54.

Diluted adjusted EPS2020 Management Incentive Plan (“MIP”) Design: For the 2020 MIP, we eliminated the Consumer Lending New Loan Volume metric and re-weighted the remaining four metrics, with increased weight on aAdjusted “Core Earnings” basis improvedOperating Expenses. These changes align with Navient’s business strategy and are directly responsive to feedback from $1.82shareholders. Our 2020 MIP is described in 2015 to $1.89 in 2016greater detail on beginning on page 55.
Successfully Managed Our Liquidity Needs

Issued $5.8 billion in FFELP loan asset-backed securities or “ABS”, $488 million in private education loan ABS and $1.3 billion in unsecured debt

 

Retired
2020 MIP Results: At or repurchased $2.6 billion of senior unsecured debt

Successfully extended the legal final maturity dates for $9.8 billion in FFELP loan ABS bonds

near maximum performance on Adjusted Diluted “Core Earnings” Per Share, Business Processing EBITDA, and Private Education Loan PortfolioGross Defaults contributed to an earned payout of 137%. Incentive award amounts for our NEOs under the 2020 MIP are described on page 57.

2018-20 Performance Improved Year-Over-YearShare Units (“PSUs”): Above-target performance on Cumulative Net Student Loan Cash Flows and Strategic Objectives, offset by below threshold results for Cumulative Revenue from Growth Businesses, resulted in an earned payout of 83% against goals set in early 2018. Performance results for the 2018-20 PSUs are described on page 60.

Private education loan charge-offs decreased by $146 million2020-22 PSUs: The design of PSUs granted in 2020 and covering the performance period 2020-22 was unchanged from 20152019, with 70% weight on Net Student Loan Cash Flows and 30% weight on “Core Earnings” Return on Equity (“ROE”). The design of 2020-22 PSUs granted to our NEOs is described in greater detail on page 58.

2021-23 PSU Design: A new performance “multiplier” based on the Company’s total shareholder return relative to other companies in the S&P 400 Financials Index (“rTSR”) has been introduced for the 2021-23 PSU design, which is otherwise the same as the design for the 2020-22 PSUs. The rTSR multiplier is intended to emphasize the Company’s keen focus on delivering superior overall returns to shareholders. This design of 2021-23 PSUs is described on page 63.

Linking Navient’s 2020 Performance to Executive Pay

The chart on the following page shows our key performance achievements in 2020 and the link between those achievements and our executive compensation program.

2021 Proxy Statement48
58

Linking Navient’s 2020 Performance to Executive Pay

 Provide Consistent Return to
Shareholders
Successfully Manage Our
Liquidity Needs
Increase Business Processing
EBITDA
Significant Loan Acquisitions2020
Performance
Highlights
We acquired $3.7 billion in educational loans, which adds to our consistent and predictable cash flows
Shareholder Return ProgramWe returned $1 billion

● Returned $523 million to our shareholders through dividends and share repurchases

● Adjusted Diluted “Core Earnings” Per Share5 of $3.40, beating the target in our 2020 annual incentive plan by nearly 13%

● Issued $1.5 billion in FFELP loan asset-backed securities (“ABS”) and $6.3 billion in private education loan ABS

● Retired $1.8 billion of senior unsecured debt, including all of our 2020 debt maturities

● Reduced the interest expense we otherwise would have incurred in 2020 by $140 million

● Increased Business Processing EBITDA6 by 16% from 2019, far exceeding the target in our 2020 annual incentive plan

● Increased Business Processing revenue by 18% from 2019

Annual
Incentive
Measures

● Adjusted Diluted “Core Earnings” Per Share

● Adjusted “Core Earnings” Operating Expenses7

● Adjusted Diluted “Core Earnings” Per Share

● Adjusted “Core Earnings” Operating Expenses

● Business Processing EBITDA

Long-term
Incentive
Measures

● Grow Intrinsic Value of Company

● Cumulative Net Student Loan Cash Flows8

● Grow Intrinsic Value of Company

● Cumulative Net Student Loan Cash Flows

● Cumulative Businesses Processing Revenue

● Improve Margins in Business Processing

 

Successfully Manage Our Federal
Education Loans Segment
Grow Our Consumer Lending
Business
Improve Performance of Our
Private Eduation Loan Portfolio
2020
Performance
Highlights

● Actively managed our loan portfolio, decreasing our delinquency rate from 11.7% to 9.2% year-over-year

● Reduced segment operating expenses by $72 million, or 20%, year-over-year

● Acquired $38 million of FFELP loans in 2020, which added to our consistent and predictable cash flows

● Originated $4.6 billion in private education refinance loans, despite the uncertain economic environment related to COVID-19

● Reduced private education loan delinquency rate 43% from 2019

● Due to improved loan performance, we were able to reduce our private education loan provision by $86 million from 2019

Annual
Incentive
Measures

● Adjusted Diluted “Core Earnings” Per Share

● Adjusted “Core Earnings” Operating Expenses

● Adjusted Diluted “Core Earnings” Per Share

● Private Education Loan Gross Defaults

● Adjusted Diluted “Core Earnings” Per Share

Long-term
Incentive
Measures

● Capture Operating Efficiencies in Legacy Student Loan Business

● Grow Intrinsic Value of Company

● Cumulative Net Student Loan Cash Flows

● Originate High Quality Student Loan Assets

● Grow Intrinsic Value of Company

● Cumulative Net Student Loan Cash Flows

● Grow Intrinsic Value of Company

● Cumulative Net Student Loan CashFlows

Pay5 See footnote 4 above for Performance:Our annual incentive plan—known as the Management Incentive Plan—is designed to drive the type of performance we saw in 2016 by focusingmore information on key performance metrics that align with our business objectives. For 2016, these performance metrics included (i) EPS on aAdjusted Diluted “Core Earnings” Per Share.

6 Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization Expense (“EBITDA”) is a non-GAAP financial measure that does not represent a comprehensive basis (ii)of accounting. For more information on the definition of EBITDA and for a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures with GAAP results, please refer to the section titled “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” on pages 35-43 of our 2020 Annual Report filed on Form 10-K on February 26, 2020, or refer to the Investor Relations section of our website located at http://www.navient.com/investors/.

7 Adjusted “Core Earnings” Operating Expenses excludes net restructuring and regulatory-related charges, as well as certain extraordinary items such as strategic debt financing proceeds,corporate transactions or other unusual or unplanned events. Adjusted “Core Earnings” Operating Expenses is a non-GAAP financial measure that does not represent a comprehensive basis of accounting. For more information on the definition of Adjusted “Core Earnings” Operating Expenses and for a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures with GAAP results, please refer to our Investor Presentation for Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2020 on the Investor Relations section of our website located at http://www.navient.com/investors/, or refer to the section titled “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” on pages 35-43 of our 2020 Annual Report filed on Form 10-K on February 26, 2020..

8 “Cumulative Net Student Loan Cash Flows” is a non-GAAP financial measure that does not represent a comprehensive basis of accounting. For more information on the definition of cumulative net student loan cash flows, please refer to the definition at footnote 17.

 

(GRAPHIC)20172021 Proxy Statement (GRAPHIC)4249

59


 

(iii) private education loan defaults. As described in the CD&A, our 2016 performance resulted in above-target payments under the 2016 Management Incentive Plan. More specifically, each of our NEOs received 111.1% of their target annual incentive for 2016.CEO Realizable Pay

 

Our long-term incentive programpay-for-performance approach over the past five years is designed to drive longer-term performance and shareholder value by delivering a significant portion of NEO compensation through equity awards. As in prior years, 50% of the equity awards granted to our NEOs in 2016 were deliveredhighlighted in the form of performance stock units (“PSUs”) that vest based onchart below, which shows the alignment between the Company’s performance (as measured by cumulative performance over a three-year performance period. In general,total shareholder return (“TSR”)) and the PSUs granted in 2016 will vest based on a combinationannual Realizable Pay (as defined below) of (i) aggregate cash flows from student loans (net of secured borrowings); (ii) cumulative revenue from growth businesses; and (iii) certain strategic objectives intended to highlight a limited number of critical, non-formulaic goals that management is focusing onour CEO over the next threepast five fiscal years.

 

The remainingCommittee believes that analysis of Realizable Pay allows a more complete understanding of the pay-for-performance relationship than sole reliance on amounts shown in the Summary Compensation Table, which reflects the grant date value of various equity awards. The table below compares the components of Mr. Remondi’s Realizable Pay for 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017 and 2016.

  Year Base Salary
($)
 Annual Incentive
Compensation
($)
 PSUs
($)
 RSUs
($)
 Stock Options
($)
 Total
($)
  2020 1,000,000 2,055,000 1,195,978 1,392,898 0 5,643,876
  2019 1,000,000 1,785,000 1,926,497 2,391,606 0 7,103,103
CEO Realizable Pay 2018 1,000,000 1,896,000 2,309,255 517,094 0 5,722,349
  2017 1,000,000 1,444,500 0 1,032,553 0 3,477,053
  2016 1,000,000 1,666,500 - 2,067,157 5,527,226 10,260,883

Realizable Pay for each of the applicable fiscal years is the sum of base salary paid, annual incentive award earned, the year-end value of RSUs and stock options granted under the Company’s long-term incentive program in that year, and the value of any PSUs with a performance period ending in that fiscal year. Stock awards are valued as of the end of each fiscal year and include the “in-the-money” value of stock options,9 RSUs and PSUs (excluding accrued dividend equivalent units on RSUs and PSUs).

Because the Company typically grants equity awards in February each year, the year-end value of these equity awards may be significantly greater or less than the grant-date value depending on whether the price of our common stock has increased or decreased by the end of the year. For example, the year-end value of stock options and RSUs granted in early

9 As of 2019, the Committee decided to our NEOs in discontinue the prior practice of granting stock options as part of the Company’s long-term incentive program.

2021 Proxy Statement50
60

2016 were delivered in the form restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and stock options. Reflecting our strong pay-for-performance culture,was substantially greater than the value of these awards increased due to an increase inupon grant, as the valueprice of our Common Stock. Stock options granted to our NEOs incommon stock increased between the February 2016 with an exercise price of $9.18grant date and December 31, 2016, while the opposite was true for RSUs granted in early 2019 and 2020.

PSUs typically vest based on performance over three fiscal years. For example, PSUs granted in early 2015 were in-the-moneydesigned to vest at the end of 2017 based on cumulative performance over the 2015-17 fiscal years. Due to the Company’s performance during that three-year period, the value at the end of the fiscal 2017 was zero as none of the PSUs were earned. PSUs granted in early 2016 and RSUs grantedvested at 125% of the target number of units based on the same date similarly increasedCompany’s performance over the applicable 2016-18 performance period, PSUs granted in value.early 2017 vested at 109% of the target number of units based on the Company’s performance over the applicable 2017-19 performance period, and PSUs granted in early 2018 vested 83% of the target number of units based on the Company’s performance over the applicable 2018-20 performance period.

Cumulative TSR assumes a base investment of $100 at December 31, 2015 and reinvestment of dividends through December 31, 2020.

 

Navient’s Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

 

We provide each of our NEOs with a compensation package that is tied to performance and aligned with the interests of our shareholders. The Compensation Committee utilizes the following guiding principles to design, implement, and monitor our executive compensation program:

 

Pay for Performance. A substantial portion of the total compensation paid to our NEOs is earned based on achievement of enterprise-wide goals that impact shareholder value.

Align Compensation with Shareholder Interests. A significant portionFor 2020, 87% of the total direct compensation provided to our NEOs is delivered in the form of equity awards, while other components of compensation are contingent on specific performance goals designed to drive shareholder value. For 2016, 86% of the total direct compensationTotal Direct Compensation opportunity provided to our CEO for 2016 was at-risk and aligned with shareholder value, including incentive awards that are dependentdepend upon the attainment of specific performance objectives, the value of Navient’s Common Stock or both. This feature of our executive compensation program is highlighted in the charts below, which show the at-risk percentages of the 2020 total direct compensation of our NEOs and the percentage of their compensation that is at-risk, with Annual Incentives and PSUs shown at target levels of performance for the full year.

*Excludes Mr. Fisher and Mr. Morris, whose 2020 compensation was pro-rated to reflect their partial-year service as Chief Financial Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer, respectively.

2021 Proxy Statement51

61

Pay for Performance. As illustrated above, more than 75% of the full-year total compensation at target for our NEOs is delivered through annual incentives and PSUs that are earned based on achievement of enterprise-wide goals that impact shareholder value.

 

Reward Annual Performance. The annual incentive award component of our NEOs’ total compensation is designed to reward achievement of key annual goals that are aligned with the Company’s annual business plan, and conversely to be lower or zero in periods in which those key annual goals are only partially achieved or not achieved at all.

 

Reward Long-term Growth. The total compensation paid to our NEOs is heavily weighted toward long-term equity-based incentives. These awards linkalign pay towith sustained performance and shareholder value creation.

 

Retention of Top Executives. Our NEOs have base salaries and benefits that are competitive which permitand not excessive, therefore permitting Navient to attract, motivate and retain executives who can drive and lead itsour success.

 

The compensation packagepackages we provide to our NEOs isare designed to be competitive when compared to other companies that compete with whom we competeus for executive talent. In setting the compensation opportunity for our NEOs, we generally target the median total direct compensation provided to similarly-situatedsimilarly situated executives by our peer group companies.

We also believe that strong governance practices and policies are aligned with shareholder interests. Our policies prohibit hedging, pledging or short-sales of any Company stock held by our NEOs and provide for the clawback of compensation in certain situations. See “Other Arrangements, Policies and Practices Related to Our Executive Compensation Programs” below.

 

How Compensation Decisions Are Made

 

In establishing competitive total compensation packages for our NEOs, the Compensation Committee relies on an analysis of market data to analyzeon the executive compensation packages offered by Navient’s peer group companies, which are described below. While the Committee generally targets the median total compensation opportunity provided by our peer group companies to similarly-situatedsimilarly situated executives, market data is only one of several factors considered in establishing the compensation

(GRAPHIC)2017 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)43

opportunity levels of our NEOs. Navient’s annual strategic business plan also factors heavily in determining certain elements of total compensation, such as our Annual Incentive and Long-term Incentive Programs, which are described in more detail below. Past pay practices and internal employee pay equity, as well as the skills and experience that each NEO brings to Navient, are all important factors considered by the Committee. Navient’s annual strategicThe Committee also considers an assessment of each NEO’s success in achieving pre-determined business plan also factors heavilyas well as individual objectives, an assessment that is prepared by the CEO and presented to the Committee at a minimum of once each year. Finally, the Committee meets with the other independent members of the Board in determining certain elements of total compensation, such as our Annual Incentivereviewing the CEO’s performance and Long-term Incentive Programs. These programs are describedconsults with those members in more detail below.setting the CEO’s compensation.

 

Role of the Compensation Consultant.Consultant

The Compensation Committee is advised by its Compensation Consultant. See “Compensation Consultant and Independence” earlier in this proxy statement for more information on the Compensation Consultant’s role as an independent advisor to the Compensation Committee.

Use of Peer Groups.Groups

Navient seeks to provide its senior executivesNEOs with competitive compensation relative to a peer group of companies. Typically, the peer group includes companies that operate businesses similar to Navient—currently both data processing/outsourcing services companies and banking/consumer finance companies—with financial metrics roughly comparable to those of Navient. The Compensation Committee reviews the composition of the peer group annually with the assistance of the Compensation Consultant, making adjustments as needed to address changes in Navient’s business and/or changes in the peer group companies due to mergers or other transactions.

 

TheIn August 2019, the Compensation Committee adopted a new peer group for 2020 to better reflect the Company’s current mix of businesses, including the continued growth and evolution of the Company’s business processing and consumer lending businesses. The Committee continues to believe that line of business and asset size are the most relevant parameters when identifying other companies of similar size and complexity, although it also took into account factors such as market capitalization when selecting the 2020 peer group. Our 2020 peer group, which the Committee used to set target pay levels at the start of 2016 was unchanged from the peer group previously used for 2015 and consisted2020, consists of the following companies:

 

2016 Navient Peer Group
 
 TotalNetNetMarket
CompanyAssets(1)Income(2)Revenues(2),(3)Cap(1)
Alliance Data Systems Corp.25,5145167,13813,198
Comerica, Inc.72,9784772,60011,733
Commerce Bancshares, Inc.25,6412751,1185,863
Discover Financial Services, Inc.92,3082,3937,24028,432
Euronet Worldwide Inc.2,7131741,9593,781
Fifth Third Bancorp142,1771,5645,81020,343
Fiserv Inc.9,7439305,50523,069
Global Payments, Inc.(4)10,6642143,77610,668
KeyCorp136,4537914,72719,745
M&T Bank Corp123,4491,3155,10624,254
Nationstar Mortgage Holdings, Inc.19,593191,2501,761
Paychex, Inc.(4)6,4417572,95221,846
Santander Consumer USA Holdings Inc.38,5397663,3004,838
Total Systems Services Inc.6,3663204,1709,013
Vantiv, Inc.7,0442133,5799,604
Western Union Co.9,4202535,42310,531
     
25thPercentile8,8262432,8648,225
Median22,5544963,97311,200
75thPercentile77,8118265,44320,719
     
Navient Corporation121,1366812,0944,980
Rank4 of 178 of 1714 of 1714 of 17
Percentile86571414
2021 Proxy Statement

52

62

2020 Navient Peer Group

 

CompanyTotal
Assets(1)
Net
Income(2)
Market
Cap(1)
Alliance Data Systems Corporation$22,547 $214 $3,677
Ally Financial Inc.182,165 1,085 13,332
Comerica Incorporated88,129 474 7,769
Conduent Incorporated4,256 (118) 1,005
Discover Financial Services, Inc.112,889 1,141 27,747
Fifth Third Bancorp204,680 1,427 19,641
KeyCorp170,336 1,343 16,024
MAXIMUS, Inc. (3)2,066 220 4,498
Paychex, Inc. (4)8,615 1,059 33,604
Regions Financial Corporation147,389 1,094 15,482
Santander Consumer USA Holdings, Inc.48,887 911 6,740
SLM Corporation30,770 881 4,649
Synchrony Financial95,948 1,385 20,263
The Western Union Company9,496 744 9,020
      
25th Percentile$12,759 $542 $5,172
Median68,508 985 11,176
75th Percentile138,764 1,129 18,737
      
Navient Corporation$87,412 $412 $1,829
Rank8 of 15 12 of 15 14 of 15
Percentile54     21     2     

 

(1)Total assets and market capitalization as ofreflect each company’s most-recentmost recent fiscal year end.end except for MAXIMUS, Inc. and Paychex Inc. Please see footnotes (3) and (4) for more information.

 

(2)Financial resultsNet income (in millions in accordance with GAAP) for each company’s most-recently-ended fiscal year, as reflected in each company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC. Except as otherwise noted below, each company’s most-recentmost recent fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.2020.

 

(3)Reflects gross revenues for the following data processing/outsourced services companies: Alliance Data Systems Corp.; Euronet Worldwide Inc.; Fiserv Inc.; Global Payments, Inc.; Paychex, Inc.; Total Systems Services Inc.; Vantiv, Inc.; and Western Union Co. Net revenues for Navient and the following banking/consumer finance companies includes net interest income plus non-interest income, excluding provision for loan losses: Comerica, Inc.; Commerce Bancshares, Inc.; Discover Financial Services, Inc.; Fifth Third Bancorp; KeyCorp; M&T Bank Corp; Nationstar Mortgage Holdings, Inc.; and Santander Consumer USA Holdings Inc.

(4)TheMAXIMUS' most recent fiscal year for Global Payments, Inc.end is September 30, 2020. Total assets reflect the most-recent fiscal quarter end and Paychex, Inc. ended Maynet income reflects 12-month trailing as of December 31, 2016.2020. Market capitalization for each of these companies reflects common shares outstanding at November 30, 2016,December 31, 2020, multiplied by the per share closing price of the company’s Common Stockcommon stock on December 31, 2016.

In May 2016, based on the Compensation Committee’s review, the peer group was changed to better highlight Navient’s three “best fit” core competency categories: customer account management, asset and risk management, and high volume operations. Peer companies were selected in each of these categories, with asset sizes similar to Navient. The current peer group, which the Committee used to set target pay levels at the start of 2017, consists of the following companies:

(GRAPHIC)2017 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)44

2017 Navient Peer Group
 
 TotalNetNetMarket
CompanyAssets(1)Income(2)Revenues(2),(3)Cap(1)
Customer Account Management    
Alliance Data Systems Corp.25,5145167,13813,198
Automatic Data Processing, Inc.43,6701,49311,66846,372
DST Systems Inc.2,7724271,5573,428
Total System Services, Inc.6,3663204,1709,013
The Western Union Company9,4202535,42310,531
     
Asset and Risk Management    
The Charles Schwab Corporation223,3831,8897,46252,324
Comerica Incorporated72,9784772,60011,733
Fifth Third Bancorp142,1771,5645,81020,343
Lincoln National Corporation261,6271,19213,33015,147
Voya Financial, Inc.214,235(428)10,7827,633
     
High Volume Operations    
Discover Financial Services92,3082,3937,24028,432
Fiserv, Inc.9,7439305,50523,069
Global Payments Inc.10,6642143,77610,668
Paychex, Inc.(4)6,4417572,95221,846
Vantiv, Inc.7,0442133,5799,604
     
25thPercentile8,2322863,67810,068
Median25,5145165,50513,198
75thPercentile117,2431,3427,35122,458
     
Navient Corporation121,1366812,094121,136
Rank5 of 168 of 1615 of 165 of 16
Percentile755432

(1)Total assets and market capitalization as2020, the last trading date of each company’s most-recent fiscal year end except for Automatic Data Processing, Inc. and Paychex, Inc. Please see footnote (4) for more information.

(2)Financial results (in millions in accordance with GAAP) for each company’s most-recently-ended fiscal year, as reflected in each company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC. Except as otherwise noted below, each company’s most-recent fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.

(3)Reflects gross revenues for the following companies: Alliance Data Systems Corporation; Automatic Data Processing, Inc.; DST Systems, Inc.; Total System Services, Inc.; The Western Union Company; Lincoln National Corporation; Voya Financial, Inc.; Fiserv, Inc.; Global Payments Inc.; Paychex, Inc.; and Vantiv, Inc. Reflects net revenues including net interest income plus non-interest income, excluding provision for loan losses for Navient and the following banking/consumer finance companies: The Charles Schwab Corporation; Comerica, Incorporated; Fifth Third Bancorp; and Discover Financial Services.year.

 

(4)ThePaychex's most recent fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 for Automatic Data Processing, Inc. and endedend is May 31, 2016 for Paychex Inc.2020. Total assets reflect the most-recent fiscal quarter end and net income reflects 12-month trailing as of November 30, 2020. Market capitalization for these companies reflects common shares outstanding at November 30, 2016,December 31, 2020, multiplied by the per share closing price of the company’s Common Stockcommon stock on December 31, 2016.2020, the last trading date of the year.

 

The new peer group consists of 15 companies, 10 of which were also in the former peer group as indicated above. The following companies were removed from the 2016 peer group: Euronet Worldwide, Inc.; Commerce Bancshares, Inc.; KeyCorp.; M&T Bank Corporation; Nationstar Mortgage Holdings, Inc.; and Santander Consumer USA Holdings Inc.

Consideration of Say-on-Pay Vote Results.Results

At our most recent annual meeting of shareholders, held on May 26, 2016,20, 2020, the Company conducted an advisory vote to approve its executive compensation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. Shareholders2019. As in prior years, shareholders expressed overwhelming support for the compensation of our NEOs, with approximately 97.7%97% of the votes present in person or(or represented by proxy at the meetingmeeting) and entitled to vote on the matter cast to approve our 20152019 executive compensation. The Committee took into account the results of this advisory vote when making compensation decisions for 2016.2020.

 

In 2015,2019, the Company conducted an advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes to approve its executive compensation.compensation, commonly known as “Say-on-Frequency.” Our shareholders indicated their preference for future advisory votes to be held annually. Consistent with the shareholders’ vote on this matter, the Board adopted a policy providing for annual advisory votes to approve the Company’s executive compensation.

 

(GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)20172021 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)4553

 

63


20162020 Executive Compensation Program

 

Primary Elements of Compensation.Compensation

The compensation program for our NEOs consists of three primary elements:

 

Compensation ElementObjectiveType of Compensation
Base SalaryTo provide a base level of cash compensation consistent with the executive’s level of responsibility.Fixed cash compensation. Reviewed annually and adjusted as appropriate.
   
Annual IncentivesTo encourage and reward our NEOs for achieving annual corporate and individual performance goals.Variable compensation. Performance-based. Payable in cash.
   
Long-term IncentivesTo motivate and retain senior executives by aligning their interests with those of shareholders through sustained performance and growth.Multi-year variable compensation. Generally payable in performance stock units (“PSUs”) and/or restricted stock units (“RSUs”), in addition to stock options.. PSUs are subject toyear performance, vesting based on cumulative performance over a three-year performance period, with each award being settled in stock at the end of the performance period to the extentdegree that goals are met. RSUs and stock options are subject to time-based vesting, with each award vesting in 1/3 increments over a three-year period. For 2016,2020, total long-term incentive value was provided 50%60% in PSUs 30%and 40% in RSUs for our CEO and 20% in stock options.split equally between PSUs and RSUs for our other NEOs other than Messrs. Fisher and Morris (see page 57 below).

 

The Compensation Committee makes decisions regarding each primary element of compensation described above. Because our focus is on performance, the Committee does not consider aggregate amounts earned or benefits accumulated by an executive from prior service with the Company as a significant factor in making compensation decisions.

 

In addition to the three primary compensation elements discussed above, our NEOs have an opportunity to participate in the Navient Deferred Compensation Plan for retirement planning purposes.Plan. The Deferred Compensation Plan offers a variety of investment choices, none of which represents an “above-market return.” We also provide our NEOs with the same standard health, welfare and retirement benefits provided to our employees, as well as limited perquisites. Each of our NEOs also participates in severance plans for our senior executives.

 

(GRAPHIC)2017 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)46

Total Direct Compensation Mix.Mix

These primary compensation elements—Base Salary, Annual Incentives and Long-term Incentives—together form Total Direct Compensation for each of our NEOs.

Consistent with Navient’s pay-for-performance culture, a substantial portion87% of the 20162020 Total Direct Compensation of our NEOsCEO was at-risk and dependent upon the attainment of specific performance objectives, as well as the value of Navient’s Common Stock. The charts belowon page 51 provide the at-risk percentages of the 20162020 Total Direct Compensation of our NEOs and the percentage of their compensation that is at-risk, with Annual Incentives and PSUs shown at target levels of performance.performance for the full year.

 

(PIE CHART) Base Salary

 

Base Salary.The Compensation Committee reviews base salary levels for the NEOs on an annual basis, but may make changes less frequently. Based on its review of Mr. Remondi’s performance in 2015, as well as a market analysis of the 20162020 Navient peer group, the Compensation Committee (in consultation with the other independent members of the Board) determined that Mr. Remondi’s 2020 base salary should remain unchanged at $1,000,000.$1,000,000, consistent with peer group benchmarking.

 

The 20162020 base salaries of Messrs. Chivavibul, Kane, Whorley and Hynesthe other NEOs were established by the Compensation Committee, taking into account recommendations made by Mr. Remondi, as well as a review of benchmarking data from the 20162020 Navient peer group. The Committee concluded that the base salary for each of Messrs. Kane, Heleen, Hauber and Lown should remain unchanged for 2020. In the case of each case,NEO, including the CEO, the Committee reached its final determinations in consultation with the Compensation Consultant.

Although we generally target the median total direct compensation provided to similarly-situated executives by our peer group of companies, the Compensation Committee determined in 2014 that the base salaries of Messrs. Chivavibul, Kane, and Hynes should be established conservatively and lower than median to reflect each executive’s relative newness to his role. The Committee made this determination in 2014 with the expectation that the base salary of each executive would be adjusted in future years commensurate with market conditions and the executive’s performance and experience. Based on their performance, the Committee determined that an increase in base salary was warranted for Messrs. Chivavibul, Kane, and Hynes in 2015. Even with this increase, the 2015 base salaries for Messrs. Chivavibul, Kane, and Hynes remained below the median base salaries provided to similarly-situated executives by our peer group companies. The base salaries for Messrs. Chivavibul, Kane and Hynes remained unchanged for 2016.

The following chart lists the base salary for each of our NEOs as of December 31, 2014;2020, December 31, 2015;2019, and December 31, 2016,2018 respectively.

  2014 Base 2015 Base 2016 Base
Navient NEOs Salary Salary Salary
Mr. Remondi $1,000,000  $1,000,000  $1,000,000
Mr. Chivavibul  350,000   380,000   380,000
Mr. Kane  400,000   450,000   450,000
Mr. Whorley*        450,000
Mr. Hynes  325,000   370,000   370,000

* Mr. Whorley joined the Company in June 2015 and was not a Named Executive Officer of the Company during 2015.

 

(GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)20172021 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)4754

 

64

 

Navient NEOs  2020 Base
Salary
  2019 Base
Salary
  2018 Base
Salary
 
Mr. Remondi $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 
Mr. Fisher* $350,000 $- $- 
Mr. Kane $460,000 $460,000 $460,000 
Mr. Heleen $385,000 $385,000 $385,000 
Mr. Hauber $350,000 $350,000 $310,000 
Mr. Morris* $285,000 $- $- 
Mr. Lown $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 

* Messrs. Fisher and Morris were not named executive officers of the Company prior to 2020. Mr. Fisher’s base salary, as reflected in the chart, became effective when he assumed the role of CFO on October 7, 2020. Mr. Morris’s 2020 annual compensation included a $30,000 supplemental bonus for each month or portion of a month in which he served as Acting CFO, which occurred from June to October 2020 for a total of $150,000 in supplemental bonus payments.

 

Annual Incentive Awards: The 20162020 Management Incentive Plan.Plan

As part of Navient’s annual strategic planning process, management developed an operating plan for the Company’s 20162020 fiscal year. The Compensation Committee and management then discussed specific corporate performance metrics and goals for Navient to be set forth in a 20162020 annual incentive program—known as the Management Incentive Plan (“MIP”)—with the express purpose of focusing executives on achieving the operating plan. As detailed below,The following table details the 2016specific performance metrics utilized in our 2020 MIP, approved byas well as the Committee incorporatesweight assigned to each metric:

2020 MIP Performance Metric2020
Weight
2019
Weight*
 Rationale
Adjusted Diluted “Core Earnings” Per Share1050%35%●          Measures overall management effectiveness
   ●          Promotes shareholder value
   ●          Key financial metric for investors
     
Adjusted “Core Earnings” Operating Expenses1120%15%●          Focuses management attention on expense reduction as our legacy loan portfolio amortizes
   ●          Key financial metric for investors, which is also critical to the achievement of our Core Earnings Per Share goal
     
Business Processing EBITDA1215%20%●          Emphasizes profitable growth in certain businesses
  ●          EBITDA growth helps to offset company-wide expenses as our legacy loan portfolio amortizes
     
Private Education Loan Gross Defaults15%10%●          Enhances the profitability of our private education loan portfolio
   ●          Aids our private education student loan customers
   ●          Key financial metric for investors to gauge the performance of our private education loan portfolio

*Remaining 20% of 2019 weight was for Consumer Lending New Loan Value metric, discontinued in 2020. 

10 Adjusted Diluted “Core Earnings” Per Share excludes net restructuring and regulatory-related charges, as well as certain extraordinary items such as strategic corporate transactions or other unusual or unplanned events. Adjusted Diluted “Core Earnings” Per Share is a numbernon-GAAP financial measure that does not represent a comprehensive basis of important design changes relativeaccounting. For a reconciliation of our non-GAAP financial measures with GAAP results, please refer to Navient’s 2015 MIP in orderthe section titled “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” on pages 35-43 of our 2020 Annual Report filed on Form 10-K on February 26, 2020, or refer to drive strategic growth and maximize shareholder return.the Investor Relations section of our website located at http://www.navient.com/investors/.

 

For 2016, the Committee decided to focus on11 Adjusted “Core Earnings” per share4 as a key financial metric, which incorporates performance relative to capital managementOperating Expenses excludes net restructuring and is aligned with the focus of investors. The Committee also introduced a new metric in 2016 for strategic debt financing proceeds in line with the Company’s 2016 operating plan. This new metric, which was specific to 2016, was intended to focus management on new financing needed to meet the Company’s liquidity requirements, including various growth initiatives. To stress the importance of strategic growth, the Committee replaced the “strategic grow modifier” in the 2015 MIP with specific revenue goals for those businesses that the Company has targeted for growth.

Two other financial metrics were carried forward from the 2015 MIP—gross defaults and fee income. Gross loan defaults is a key metric used by our investors and others to measure the performance of our loan portfolios. Incorporating this metric into our annual incentive plan helps drive our efforts to minimize loan defaults, which helps our investorsregulatory-related charges, as well as our student loan customers. Fee income emphasizes the continuing importance of our fee-based businesses, which generate income through loan servicing, asset recovery andcertain extraordinary items such as strategic corporate transactions or other business processing activities.

In addition to establishing a performance target for each of the performance metrics referenced above, the Committee assigned a weight to each metric and established a scale of “payout factors” to assess the Company’s performance relative to target. As noted in the chart below, these payout factors range from 50% based on a threshold level of performance, to 150% based on a maximum level of performance, with performance below threshold resulting in a payout factor of 0%. The chart below sets forth these payout factors:

  Below PerformancePerformancePerformancePerformance
2016 ThresholdThresholdTargetMaximum
Performance MetricWeight(Payout Factor = 0%)(Payout Factor = 50%)(Payout Factor = 100%)(Payout Factor = 150%)
Earnings Per Share on a “Core Earnings” Basis(1)40%<$1.45$1.45$1.85>= $2.08
Strategic Debt Financing Proceeds (millions)(2)20%<$500$500$750>= $1,000
Fee Income (millions)10%<$650$650$710>= $760
Private Education Loan Gross Defaults (millions)15%>$725$725$687<= $650
Revenue from Growth Business(3)15%<$150$150$170>= $195

(1)Excludes any regulatory remediation charges.

(2)Reflects incremental cash raised from unsecured debt issuances, financing of unencumbered private education loans, financing of trust overcollateralization and other new sources of liquidity. Excludes financing of unencumbered FFELP loans and other readily-available sources of liquidity.

(3)Revenue from non-federal-loan-related businesses.

For each metric, the Committee established a payout curve for performance between threshold-target and target-maximum.

4“Coreunusual or unplanned events. Adjusted “Core Earnings” per ShareOperating Expenses is a non-GAAP financial measure that does not represent a comprehensive basis of accounting. For more information on the definition of Core Adjusted “Core Earnings” Operating Expenses and for a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures with GAAP results, please refer to our Investor Presentation for Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2020 on the Investor Relations section of our website located at http://www.navient.com/investors/, or refer to the section titled “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” on pages 35-43 of our 2020 Annual Report filed on Form 10-K on February 26, 2020.

12 Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization Expense (“EBITDA”) is a non-GAAP financial measure that does not represent a comprehensive basis of accounting. For more information on the definition of EBITDA and for a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures with GAAP results, please refer to the discussion included in Item 7section titled “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” on pages 35-43 of our 20162020 Annual Report filed on Form 10-K on February 24, 2017,26, 2020, or refer to the Investor Relations section of our website located at http://www.navient.com/about/investors/.

 

(GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)20172021 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)4855

 

65

For the 2020 MIP, the Committee continued its focus on Adjusted Diluted “Core Earnings” Per Share as the plan’s key financial metric. Three other financial metrics were carried forward from the 2019 plan—Business Processing EBITDA, Private Education Loan Gross Defaults, and Adjusted “Core Earnings” Operating Expenses. In response to investor feedback, and following the Committee’s review of Navient’s operating plan, the Consumer Lending New Loan Volume metric was removed for 2020. The weightings of the remaining performance measures were adjusted, with increased weightings for each of the performance metrics except Business Processing EBITDA, which was decreased to align with the weighting given to Private Education Loan Gross Defaults. The 2020 MIP remains well-aligned with the Company’s business plans, including our growth strategy for Consumer Lending, as performance in the Consumer Lending market continues to be included as part of the calculation for three 2020 MIP measures (Business Processing EBITDA does not include performance in this market as part of its calculation), with a total of 85% weight.

 

The Committee established a scale of “payout factors” to assess the Company’s performance relative to the target established for each of these performance metrics. These payout factors range from 50% based on a threshold level of performance, to 150% based on a maximum level of performance. Performance below threshold results in a payout factor of 0%. For each metric, the Committee also established a payout curve for performance between threshold-target and target-maximum.

The chart below sets forth the performance threshold, target, and maximum, and the payout factors for each performance metric:

2020 MIP Payout Factors
2020
Performance Metric
Below Performance
Threshold
(Payout Factor = 0%)
Performance
Threshold
(Payout Factor = 50%)
Performance
Target
(Payout Factor = 100%)
Performance
Maximum
(Payout Factor= 150%)
Adjusted Diluted “Core Earnings” Per Share<$2.62$2.62$3.02>= $3.43
Adjusted “Core Earnings” Operating Expenses (millions)>$954$954$926<=$902
Business Processing EBITDA (millions)<$41$41$48>= $55
Private Education Loan Gross Defaults (millions)>$406$406$366<= $326

Our performance in 2020 yielded an overall performance score of 137%, driven by notably strong performance against three of the four 2020 MIP goals. The chart below sets forth (i) each performance metric, (ii) the performance target approved by the Compensation Committee for each metric, (iii) the 20162020 actual performance of the Company for each metric, (iv) the payout factor for each metric based on the Company’s level of achievement relative to target, (v) the relative weighting of each performance metric, and (vi) the performance score attributable to each metric, as well as the overall performance score.

 

2016 Performance Metric Performance
Target
  2016 Actual
Performance
  Payout
Factor
  Weighting  Performance
Score
 
(i) (ii)  (iii)  (iv)  (v)  (vi) 
Earnings Per Share on a “Core Earnings” Basis $1.85  $1.86   102.2%  40%  40.9%
Strategic Debt Financing Proceeds (millions) $750  $1,306   150.0%  20%  30.0%
Fee Income (millions) $710  $708   98.3%  10%  9.8%
Private Education Loan Gross Defaults (millions) $687  $635   150.0%  15%  22.5%
Revenue from Growth Business $170  $151   52.5%  15%  7.9%
Overall Performance Score                  111.1%
2020 MIP Performance Results
2020 Performance Metric
(i)
  Performance
Target
(ii)
  2020 Actual
Performance
(iii)
  Payout
Factor
(iv)
  Weighting
(v)
  Performance
Score
(vi)
 
Adjusted Diluted “Core Earnings” Per Share13 $3.02 $3.40  147.5% 50% 73.8%
Adjusted “Core Earnings” Operating Expenses14 (millions) $926 $931  91.1% 20% 18.2%
Business Processing EBITDA15 (millions) $48 $57  150.0% 15% 22.5%
Private Education Loan Gross Defaults (millions) $366 $213  150.0% 15% 22.5%
Overall Performance Score:137.0%
13See footnote 10 above for additional information regarding Adjusted Diluted “Core Earnings” Per Share.

 

14 See footnote 11 above for additional information regarding Adjusted “Core Earnings” Operating Expenses, which for 2020 excludes $33 million in net regulatory-related expenses and $9 million in restructuring expenses.

15See footnote 12 above for additional information regarding EBITDA.

(GRAPHIC)2021 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)56
66

These performance results were reviewed and certified by the Compensation Committee in January 2017. Annual2021. In determining the incentive awardsaward amounts to be paid to each of our NEOs under the 2020 MIP, the Committee also considered the individual performance of each NEO, as reflected in an annual performance assessment prepared by our CEO and presented to the Committee. The Committee also consulted with the other independent members of the Board in reviewing the CEO’s performance and setting his incentive payout.

Based on Navient’s strong 2020 financial results, which resulted in above-target performance under the 2020 MIP, the Committee did not make any changes to our incentive plan goals or payouts to offset the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. The incentive award amounts for 2016our NEOs under the 2020 MIP, which were based solely on the overall performance score and paid in cash in February 2017. The 2016 incentive award amount for each of the NEOs under the 2016 MIP is2021, are set forth in the following table.

 

2020 MIP Payouts2020 MIP Payouts 
Navient NEOs Target % of
Base Salary
 2016 Target Incentive
Amount ($)
 Overall
Performance
Score
 2016 MIP Incentive Award
Amount ($)
 Target % of
Base Salary
2020 Target Incentive Award
at 100% Achievement
Amount ($)
2020 MIP Incentive Award
at 137% Achievement
Amount ($)
Mr. Remondi  150%  1,500,000   111.1%  1,666,500 150%1,500,000  2,055,000 
Mr. Chivavibul  150%  570,000   111.1%  633,270 
Mr. Fisher*150%222,704 305,105 
Mr. Kane  150%  675,000   111.1%  749,925 150%690,000 945,300 
Mr. Whorley  150%  675,000   111.1%  749,925 
Mr. Hynes  150%  555,000   111.1%  616,605 
Mr. Heleen150%577,500 791,175 
Mr. Hauber150%525,000 719,250 
Mr. Morris125%356,250 488,062 
Mr. Lown**150%600,000 0 

* Mr. Fisher’s annual incentive was pro-rated to reflect his appointment as Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer at the beginning of the fourth quarter.

** Mr. Lown did not receive an annual incentive for 2020 due to his resignation in May 2020.

 

2020 Long-term Incentive Program.Based uponProgram

Our long-term incentive program is designed to drive long-term performance and shareholder value by delivering a significant portion of NEO compensation through a mix of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and performance stock units (“PSUs”). Similar to the recommendationmix for 2019, Mr. Remondi’s 2020 long-term incentive award was delivered 60% in the form of PSUs and 40% in the Chief Executive Officerform of RSUs (in terms of grant date value). Each of our other NEOs (excluding Messrs. Fisher and onMorris) received long-term incentive awards split equally between RSUs and PSUs.

Mr. Fisher’s 2020 long-term incentive award was delivered 100% in the form of RSUs in accordance with the standard practice for employees at his level (Vice President) at the time he received his grant in February 2020. In addition, in connection with his promotion to CFO in October 2020, Mr. Fisher received an additional, one-time award of RSUs with a market analysisgrant-date value of $150,000. Mr. Morris’s 2020 long-term incentive award was delivered 75% in the 2016 Navient peer group performed byform of RSUs and 25% in the Committee’s independent consultant,form of PSUs in accordance with the Compensation Committee approved 2016standard practice for employees at his level (Senior Vice President) at the time he received his grant in February 2020.

The chart below details the 2020 long-term incentive awards for our NEOs in early 2016 in the following amounts: Mr. Remondi ($3,850,000); Mr. Chivavibul ($990,000); Mr. Kane ($1,320,000); Mr. Whorley ($1,320,000); and Mr. Hynes ($880,000).NEOs:

 

These long-term incentive amounts reflect increases over 2015. With the FFELP portfolio in decline, the Committee sought to further emphasize the important long-term objectives of achieving profitable growth from other sources and stabilizing liquidity and debt, objectives that were highlighted in newly-designed PSUs. The Committee also determined that increases in long-term incentives were consistent with peer group levels and warranted by the executive team’s continued strong performance in the face of an increasingly challenging regulatory, rating agency and financial environment. Finally, in the case of Mr. Hynes, the Committee decided that a larger increase was needed to bring the value of his long-term incentives closer to the peer group median.

The 2016 long-term incentive awards were delivered as 50% in PSUs, 30% in RSUs, and 20% in stock options as follows:

Navient NEOs Performance Stock Units(1)
(#)
 Restricted Stock Units(2)
(#)
 Stock Options(3)
(#)
 Total Award
Value(4)
($)
 Performance Stock Units(1)
(#)
Restricted Stock Units(2)
(#)
Total Award
Value(3)
($)
Mr. Remondi  209,694   125,816   762,376   3,850,000 212,765141,8435,000,000
Mr. Chivavibul  53,921   32,352   196,039   990,000 
Mr. Fisher-23,030240,000
Mr. Kane  71,895   43,137   261,386   1,320,000 35,4601,000,000
Mr. Whorley  71,895   43,137   261,386   1,320,000 
Mr. Hynes  47,930   28,758   174,257   880,000 
Mr. Heleen26,595750,000
Mr. Hauber17,730500,000
Mr. Morris4,43213,297250,000
Mr. Lown(4)42,5531,200,000

 

(1)This column represents the target PSUs granted to each of the NEOs on February 3, 2016,6, 2020, with the target number of PSUs equal to 50% (60% for Mr. Remondi, 25% for Mr. Morris and 0% for Mr. Fisher) of the 2016approved 2020 long-term incentive award amount approved by the Compensation Committee divided by the closing price of Navient Common Stock on the grant date. Each PSU is subject to performance-based vesting over a three-year performance period beginning on January 1, 2016,2020 and ending on December 31, 2018.2022. The vesting provisions of these PSUs are described below.

(GRAPHIC)2021 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)57

67

 

(2)This column represents the RSUs granted to each of the NEOs on February 3, 2016,6, 2020, with the number of RSUs equal to 30%50% (40% for Mr. Remondi. 75% for Mr. Morris and 100% for Mr. Fisher) of the 2016approved 2020 long-term incentive award amount approved by the Compensation Committee divided by the closing price of Navient Common Stock on the grant date. These RSUs are scheduled to vest in one-third increments on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date, subject to certain terms and conditions.

 (GRAPHIC)2017 Proxy Statement (GRAPHIC)49

(3)This column represents the stock options granted to each Mr. Fisher received two separate RSU awards; a regular grant in February 2020 with a grant-date value of the NEOs on February 3, 2016, with the number$90,000 (representing 100% of stock options determined using 20% of the 2016his 2020 annual long-term incentive award amount approved by the Compensation Committeeaward) and the Black-Scholes optiona one-time promotional grant in October 2020 with a grant-date value (which incorporates the closing price of Navient Common Stock on the grant date). These stock options are scheduled to vest in one-third increments on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date, subject to certain terms and conditions.$150,000.

 

(4)(3)Total award value differs slightly from the grant date fair value, as reflected in the “Summary Compensation Table” and “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table, as the number of units/optionsunits is rounded down to the nearest whole unit or option to avoid the issuance of fractional units or shares.

 

(4)Mr. Lown’s 2020 long-term incentive awards were forfeited in connection with his resignation in May 2020

The Compensation Committee determined that

2020-22 Performance Stock Units

PSUs should continue to have the most weight (50%)granted in the mix2020 as part of our 2020 long-term incentive vehiclesprogram are designed to strongly align executive payvest at the end of 2022, with the Company’s long-term performance. The mix of RSUs and stock options was similara potential payout ranging from 0% to the 2015 long-term incentives, but RSUs were given slightly more weight (30%, compared to 20% in 2015) consistent with peer group practices.

The Committee modified the PSU structures for our NEOs in 2016 to better align with the Company’s objectives in 2016 and beyond for cash flow, revenue growth and achievement of strategic objectives. These PSUs vest based on performance over the three-year period from 2016 to 2018. The performance metrics, weightings and potential for PSU vesting as a percentage150% of the target number of units, based on cumulative performance over the 2020-22 performance period.

The design of the 2020 PSUs was unchanged from 2019, with a 70% weight assigned to net student loan cash flows as a primary driver of the Company’s value, and a 30% weight assigned to return on equity (“ROE”), a standard financial metric that incents a disciplined approach to managing, allocating and investing capital to achieve the best return for shareholders. Given the impact of accounting rules on certain businesses, separate annual ROE targets will be established by the Committee for each year in the 2020-22 PSU performance cycle, with targets set at the beginning of each year. Each annual ROE target will have 10% weight and earned awards will not be paid until after the end of the 2020-22 performance period. The 2020 PSUs, like the 2019 PSUs, utilize “Core Earnings” ROE calculated using average stockholder’s equity on a “Core Earnings” basis, which eliminates volatility associated with derivative related mark-to-market adjustments that are out of management’s control.16

These performance metrics for the 2020-22 PSUs are summarized below:

2020-22 Performance Stock Units
2020-22 PSU Performance MetricWeightRationale
Cumulative Net Student Loan Cash Flows1770%Promotes successful management of our loan portfolios
Critical driver of shareholder value, supporting dividends, share repurchases and debt payments
Supports growth of strategic businesses, including consumer lending
“Core Earnings” Return on Equity1810% / 10% / 10%Requires focus on managing, allocating and investing capital to achieve the best return for shareholders
Standard financial metric that permits comparability across peer groups and industry-wide benchmarks

16 For purposes of these PSUs, “Core Earnings” Return on Equity is calculated as a percentage equal to the Company’s “Core Earnings” net income for each of fiscal years 2020, 2021 and 2022 (as shown in the chart below:segment reporting footnote in the Company’s audited financial statements as published in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K, excluding the impact of any regulatory and restructuring costs), divided by average stockholder’s equity for each such year (determined using the average balance of stockholder’s equity on a “Core Earnings” basis for each quarter in a given year).

 

Performance MetricWeight Percentage of PSUs Vesting(1)
 0%50%100%150%
Net Student Loan Cash Flows(2)50% Less than $7.5 billion$7.5 billion$7.8 billion$8.6 billion or greater
Cumulative Revenue from Growth Businesses(3)30% Less than $520 million$520 million$665 million$775 million or greater
Strategic Objectives20%Build strong relationships with state and federal regulators
Pursue opportunistic loan portfolio acquisitions
Significantly reduce expenses
Improve profitability of key business lines

(1)For points between each performance level,17 Cumulative Net Student Loan Cash Flows is a non-GAAP financial measure that does not represent a comprehensive basis of accounting. Cumulative Net Student Loan Cash Flows are the vesting percentages will be interpolated.

(2)Aggregate cash flows net of secured borrowings from student loans realized for the fiscal years 2016, 2017 and 2018, including student loan cash flows realized from new acquisitions, but excluding the impact of cash flows for fiscal years beyond 2018 that are accelerated through securitizing or pledging unencumbered student loans, or through loan sales.

(3)That portion of the Company’s aggregate revenue for fiscal years 2016-18 from non-federal-loan-related businesses.

The Compensation Committee selected each of these performance metrics with specific business objectives in mind. Aggregate cash flows net of secured borrowings from all student loans (net of secured borrowings)(including private credit refinance loans) realized for the fiscal years 2016, 20172020, 2021 and 20182022, including student loan cash flows realized from new acquisitions, but excluding the impact of cash flows for fiscal years beyond 2022 that are accelerated through securitizing or pledging unencumbered student loans or through loan sales.

18 Annual “Core Earnings” Return on Equity targets and range are established by the Committee at the beginning of each respective year, with each year’s performance counting 1/3 towards the total 30% weight. “Core Earnings” Return on Equity is a non-GAAP financial measure that does not represent a critical drivercomprehensive basis of shareholder value, and thus are givenaccounting. For more information on the most weight. Strong cash flow performance supports our shareholder dividends, share repurchases, debt repayments and strategic investments in future growth areas. Cumulative revenue from growth businesses isdefinition of “Core Earnings” Return on Equity, see footnote 16 above. For a measurereconciliation of our successnon-GAAP financial measures with GAAP results, please refer to the section titled “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” on pages 35-43 of our 2020 Annual Report filed on Form 10-K on February 26, 2020, as well as the section titled “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” in realizingeach of our long-range business plansquarterly reports filed on Forms 10-Q.

(GRAPHIC)2021 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)58

68

The chart below shows the potential for vesting as a percentage of the target number of PSUs:

2020-22 Performance Stock Units
Performance MetricWeightPercentage of 2020-22 PSUs Vesting*
0%50%100%150%

Cumulative Net Student Loan

Cash Flows

70%

Less than

$6.75 billion

$6.75 billion$7.8 billion$8.7 billion or greater

2020 “Core Earnings” Return

on Equity

10%

Less than

18.6%

18.6%20.6%22.6%

2021 “Core Earnings” Return

on Equity

10%Less than 16%16%18%20%

2022 “Core Earnings” Return

on Equity19

10%----

* For points between each performance level, the vesting percentages will be interpolated. That is, vesting will be interpolated between threshold performance (50% vesting) and our ability to incorporate new growth businesses to balance our maturing portfolio of FFELP loans. Finally, strategic objectives are intended to highlight a limited number of critical, non-formulaic goals that management is focusing on over the next three years.target performance (100% vesting), as well as between target performance and maximum performance (150% vesting).

 

With regard toRegarding the performance targets established for each metric, the Compensation Committee believes that these targets are set at challenging but achievable levels in light of the uncertain regulatory, rating agency and financial environment the Company faces. The Committee believes thatconsiders these headwinds increaseenvironmental factors, prevailing market-competitive return ratios, and the resulting degree of difficulty that management faces in achieving the Company’s long-term growth and performance goals when establishing appropriate levels for threshold, target and maximum performance levels and payout curves. The Committee established threshold, target and maximum levels of performance for 2021 “Core Earnings” Return on Equity at the beginning of calendar year 2021. These levels reflect our general market expectations for 2021, as well as our expectation that average stockholder’s equity for 2021 (determined using the average balance of stockholder’s equity on a “Core Earnings” basis for each quarter in 2021) will remain stable in 2021 while our legacy loan portfolio continues to amortize, resulting in a lower expected “Core Earnings” Return on Equity for 2021 relative to 2020.

The Company achieved a “Core Earnings” ROE of 23.2% for fiscal year 2020, which equates to maximum achievement (150%) of the Company.2020 goal for that performance metric.

 

2019-21 Performance Stock Units

The achievement of the 2020 ROE performance goal at the maximum level (150%) described above applies to the 2020 “Core Earnings” ROE performance metric for the 2019-21 PSU awards granted in early 2019 (weighted at 10% of the 2019-21 PSUs). The Company achieved a 2019 “Core Earnings” ROE of 17.4%, which equated to maximum achievement (150%) of the 2019 goal for that metric under the 2019-21 PSUs (also at weighted 10% of the 2019-21 PSUs). These results were driven by Navient’s strong earnings results in both 2019 and 2020.

2018-20 Performance Stock Units

Fiscal year 2020 also marked the final year of a three-year performance period associated with PSUs granted to our executive team in early 2018 as part of our long-term incentive program. These 2018-20 PSUs were designed to vest in early 2021 based on performance through the end of 2020, with a potential payout ranging from 0% to 150% of the target number of units, determined by cumulative performance over the 2018-20 performance period. The following performance metrics were selected in early 2018 to focus management on specific long-term business objectives:

19The Committee will establish the “Core Earnings” Return on Equity target and range for 2022 at the beginning of calendar year 2022.

(GRAPHIC)2021 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)59

69

2018-20 PSU Performance MetricWeightRationale
Cumulative Net Student Loan Cash Flows50%Promotes successful management of our loan portfolios
Critical driver of shareholder value, supporting dividends, share repurchases and debt payments
Supports growth of strategic businesses, including consumer lending
Cumulative Revenue from Growth Businesses30%Emphasizes strategic growth as our legacy loan portfolio amortizes
Offsets Company-wide expenses as our legacy loan portfolio amortizes
Strategic Objectives20%Focuses management on critical, long-term strategic goals

The following chart summarizes the Company’s cumulative performance over the 2018-20 performance period relative to the targets established for each of these metrics. Our performance during this three-year period resulted in the 2018-20 PSUs vesting at 83% of the target number of units.

2018-20 Performance Stock Units
2018-20 Performance MetricPerformance
Target
 2018-20 Actual
Performance
 Payout
Factor
 Weight Performance Score
Cumulative Net Student Loan Cash Flows20 (millions)$8,700 $8,982 123% 50% 62%
Cumulative Revenue from Growth Businesses21 (millions)$1,098 $854 0% 30% 0%
Strategic Objectives      105% 20% 21%
●    Originate High Quality Student Loan Assets           
●    Capture Operating Efficiencies in Legacy Student Loan Business           
●    Improve Margins in Business Processing           
●    Build Strong Relationships with State and Federal Regulators           
●    Grow Intrinsic Value of Company           

Overall Performance Score:83%

The Committee considered management’s key achievements during the 2018-20 performance period when assessing the Company’s performance relative to the strategic goals established at the beginning of that period. These key achievements are set forth in the table on the following page.

20 Cumulative Net Student Loan Cash Flows is a non-GAAP financial measure that does not represent a comprehensive basis of accounting. Cumulative Net Student Loan Cash Flows include aggregate cash flows net of secured borrowings from student loans realized for the fiscal years 2018, 2019 and 2020, including student loan cash flows realized from new acquisitions, but excluding the impact of cash flows for fiscal years beyond 2020 that are accelerated through securitizing or pledging unencumbered student loans or through loan sales.

21 Cumulative Revenue from Growth Businesses includes that portion of the Company’s aggregate revenue for fiscal years 2018-20 from non-federal-loan-related businesses.

(GRAPHIC)2021 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)60

70

2018-20 Performance Stock Units
2018-20 Strategic ObjectivesAchievements
Originate High Quality Student Loan AssetsGrew private education refinance loan originations from $2.8B in 2018, to $4.9B in 2019, and originated $4.6B in private education refinance loans in 2020 despite the uncertain economic environment related to COVID-19
Credit loss rates for Earnest refinance loans have averaged 50% lower than the market index of similar student loan refinance portfolios
Capture Operating Efficiencies in Legacy Student Loan BusinessReduced direct servicing unit cost between 2018-20 while improving customer satisfaction
Continued to implement automation and system enhancements, as well as program and procedural improvements, that have driven down expenses and improved efficiency
Moved core IT systems that support our servicing operations to a more variable cost structure through strategic agreement with First Data, now part of Fiserv
Improve Margins in Business ProcessingBusiness Processing EBITDA margins improved in 2018-19 and held steady in 2020 despite pandemic-related impacts to core business
Implemented operational improvements, including robotic process automations and call optimization efforts, and reduced employee turnover
Secured several large-scale healthcare revenue cycle management engagements and won new contracts in 2020 to support states in providing unemployment benefits and COVID-19 contract tracing services
Build Strong Relationships with State and Federal RegulatorsEstablished or reestablished dialogue with various regulatory bodies
Received positive examinations from key federal and state regulators
Continued to provide fact-based responses to ongoing litigation
Grow Intrinsic Value of CompanyDelivered increasing Adjusted Diluted “Core Earnings” Per Share results year-over-year
Broadened information available to investors through periodic disclosures, guidance of future impacts, and investor conferences
Value delivered to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases

These strategic goals were established at the beginning of the three-year period to be challenging but achievable. In evaluating management’s performance over the entire performance period, the Committee considered the business environment during the performance period and its impact on the difficulty of achieving the strategic goals. Based on its evaluation of the strategic goal achievements individually and overall, the Committee determined that management’s accomplishments relative to these strategic goals warranted a payout factor of 105% (vs. maximum payout factor of 150%).

Deferred Compensation.Compensation

We provide our NEOs with the opportunity to defer a portion of their compensation on a tax-deferred basis under the Navient Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”).

The Deferred Compensation Plan is designed to provide all of our senior employees, including our NEOs, with the opportunity to save for retirement and other personal expenses on a tax-favoredtax-advantaged basis. Each participating employee may elect to defer a portion of his or her eligible compensation under the Deferred Compensation Plan, and amounts deferred are credited to bookkeeping accounts along withaccounts. The Company matchingdoes not make any contributions designed to encourage employee participation.the Deferred Compensation Plan for periods on or after January 1, 2019. Amounts in each participant’s account are indexed to one or more investment alternatives chosen by each participant from

 (GRAPHIC)2017 Proxy Statement (GRAPHIC)50

a range of market-based alternatives. The Deferred Compensation Plan does not pay above-market or preferential earnings on compensation deferred under or contributed to the plan. Additional details for our NEOs who participate can be found below under the “Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation” table.

 

Health, Welfare and Retirement Benefits.Benefits

Our NEOs are eligible to participate in the same broad-based employee benefit programs that we offer to our other employees, such as group health benefits and tax-qualified retirement benefits.

(GRAPHIC)2021 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)61

71

Perquisites

 

Perquisites.Perquisites are limited and are not a significant portion of our compensation program. Our policy is to allow limited personal use of the company’s aircraft by our NEOs. To the extent an NEO uses Navient’s private aircraft for personal travel, the NEO must reimburse Navient for the variable flight costs of such personal use. These reimbursements exceed the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code. In 2016,2020, we did not provide relocation allowances to our NEOs.any NEO other than to Mr. Fisher, who, at the time of his promotion to CFO in October 2020, was based at the Company’s Herndon, Virginia office and was made eligible for up to $150,000 in relocation benefits to facilitate his relocation to the Wilmington, Delaware area. We provided transportation allowances to our CEO as described in the Summary Compensation Table.Table below.

Severance Benefits

 

The Compensation Committee has approved annual physicals for our senior executives, including our NEOs. We believe that executive physicals align with our wellness initiative as well as assist in mitigating risk linked to unplanned succession events. Executive physicals are intended to identify any health risks and medical conditions as early as possible in an effort to achieve more effective treatment and outcomes.

Severance Benefits.Navient has adopted an executive severance plan and a change in control severance plan, which are described in greater detail under the heading “Arrangements with Named Executive Officers” below. We generally utilize plans (as opposed to individual agreements) to provide severance and change in control payments and benefits for several reasons. First, a “plan” approach provides us with the flexibility to change the terms of severance benefits from time to time. In addition, this approach is more transparent, both internally and externally, which eliminates the need to negotiate severance or other employment separation benefits on a case-by-case basis and assures each of the executives that his or her severance benefits are comparable to those of other executives with similar levels of responsibility and tenure.

 

Under the executive severance plan, our NEOs are eligible for severance payments in the event of an involuntary termination of employment without “cause.” In addition, they are eligible for “double trigger” severance payments under the change in control severance plan in the event of an involuntary termination of employment without “cause” or a termination of employment with “good reason” in connection with a change in control of Navient. All plan participants, including our NEOs, are entitled to certain limited “single trigger” benefits upon a change in control, including equity acceleration, only when equity awards are not honored, assumed, or replaced by a successor employer of Navient. Such equity acceleration provides NEOs with the benefit of these outstanding awards granted in prior years. They also may be able to exercise the awards and possibly participate in the change in control transaction for the consideration received.

 

Other Arrangements, Policies and Practices Related to Our Executive Compensation ProgramsProgram

 

Share Ownership Guidelines.Guidelines

Navient has adopted share ownership guidelines applicable to its senior executives, including our NEOs. These ownership guidelines, which are expectedrequired to be achieved over a five-year period, are as follows:

 

Chief Executive Officer — Lesser of 1 million shares or $5 million in value

 

Executive Vice President — Lesser of 200,000 shares or $1 million in value

 

Senior Vice President — Lesser of 70,000 shares or $350,000 in value

Each of our NEOs other than Mr. Remondi and Mr. Morris holds the title of Executive Vice President; Mr. Morris is a Senior Vice President.

 

The guidelines encourage continued ownership of a significant amount of Navient’s Common stock acquired through equity awards and help align the interests of our senior executives with the interests of our shareholders. A senior executive must hold Navient Common Stock acquired through equity grants until the applicable thresholds are met, and a senior executive will not be eligible to receive equity grants during the following year if he or she sells this stock (whether before or after such guidelines are met), if such sale would resultresults in a decrease below the thresholds established by the guidelines.

 

The following shares and share units count towards the ownership guidelines: shares held in brokerage accounts; vested shares credited to deferred compensation accounts; shares credited to qualified retirement plan accounts; vested performance stock and PSUs;stock; restricted stock and RSUs that vest solely upon the passage of time, on an after-tax basis, and vested stock options, to the extent that they are “in-the-money” on an after-tax basis.

 

All of Navient’s NEOs are in compliance with the share ownership guidelines as of the date of this proxy statement either through their stock ownership levels or due to the five-year initial period not being finished.

 

 (GRAPHIC)2017 Proxy Statement (GRAPHIC)51

Hedging/Pledging Prohibition

 

Hedging/Pledging Prohibition.Navient policy prohibits directors and senior management from engaging in hedging, pledging and certain other transactions involving Navient Common Stock. See “Director Compensation” above for additional details.

 

(GRAPHIC)2021 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)62

72

Policy on Rule 10b5-1 Trading Plans.Plans

The Company has a policy governing the use by directors and executive officers of pre-established trading plans for sales of our Common Stock. See “Director Compensation” above for additional details.

Clawback

 

Clawback.Awards made to senior officers, including our NEOs, under the Navient Corporation 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan (as amended and restated) are subject to clawback in the event of a material misstatement of Navient’s financial results and other qualifying events. Navient enhanced its clawback policy in 2017 following an extensive review and consideration of the Company’s then-existing clawback policy by the Compensation Committee. The enhanced clawback policy grants the Board discretion to recoup incentive compensation both in the event of a financial restatement and in the case of the executive’s misconduct involving a material violation of Navient policy or commission of fraud or other misconduct involving Navient. Following engagement with its shareholders, the Board further enhanced the clawback policy in March 2018 to add a clawback trigger in the event of misconduct committed by persons under a senior officer’s supervision.

 

Navient Compensation Committee Process for Approving Long-term Awards.Awards

The Compensation Committee approves long-term awards on an annual basis at a regularly scheduled committee meeting. The Committee has delegated authority to a sub-committee consisting of the Compensation Committee Chair and the CEO (the “Sub-Committee”) to approve long-term awards for new employees and promotions below the executive officer level. These awards generally are effective on the day on which the Sub-Committee approves the awards.awards (or, if later, the employee’s hire or promotion date). The Compensation Committee approves any awards to newly-hirednewly hired or promoted executive officers. The grant date for these awards generally is the applicable meeting date of the Committee at which the awards are approved.approved (or, if later, the officer’s hire or promotion date). Under the terms of the Navient Corporation 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, stock options are required to be priced at the closing market price of Navient’s Common Stock on the Nasdaq on the date of grant.

 

Tax Deductibility of Compensation Over $1 Million.Million

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (“Section 162(m)”) can potentially disallowgenerally disallows a federal income tax deduction for annual compensation over $1 million paid to theour chief executive officer, and thechief financial officer, three other highest-paid NEOs (excluding the chief financial officer)most highly compensated officers and anyone who were servinghas served as one of the last day of Navient’s fiscal year (“our covered employees”). One exception to Section 162(m)’s disallowance of a U.S. federal income tax deduction for compensation over $1 million applies to “performance-based compensation” paidofficers after 2016, other than pursuant to shareholder-approved plans. Although much of thecertain grandfathered compensation opportunity in our executive compensation program is performance-based and generally deductible for U.S. federal income tax purposes, thearrangements. The Compensation Committee retains the flexibility to award compensation to the NEOs that is not deductible for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

 

With regardChanges to our 2016 annual incentive program—known as the Management Incentive Plan (“MIP”)—special rules applyOur Executive Compensation Program for executives subject to Section 162(m). The Committee established a separate performance target applicable only to these executives. This “162(m) performance target” for 2016 required that the Company achieve positive Core Net Income for the year. If this target is achieved, each executive subject to Section 162(m) becomes eligible to receive an incentive payment based on the maximum applicable award (i.e., 150%). However, the Committee retained “negative discretion” to reduce the executive’s incentive payment using the same criteria established for all other MIP participants who are not subject to Section 162(m). This approach allows the MIP to operate in the same manner for all participants, regardless of whether they are subject to Section 162(m).2021

 

The Compensation Committee also establishedmade changes to our long-term incentive program for 2021 by introducing a separate 162(m)new relative performance target formetric to the design of PSUs granted in connection2021.

As in prior years, the PSUs granted in 2021 are designed to vest at the end of a three-year performance period, with our 2016 long-term incentive program. This 162(m)a potential payout based on cumulative performance over the 2021-23 performance period. The design of the 2021 PSUs is similar to PSUs granted in 2019 and 2020 in that a 70% weight has been assigned to net student loan cash flows as a primary driver of the Company’s value, and a 30% weight has been assigned to return on equity (“ROE”). As in prior years, separate annual ROE targets will be established by the Committee for each year in the 2021-23 PSU performance cycle, with targets set at the beginning of each year, and each annual ROE target requires thatwill have 10% weight. Potential payouts based on performance relative to these two performance metrics will range from 0% to 150% of the Company achieve positive Cumulative Core Net Incometarget number of units, and earned awards will be paid after the end of the 2021-23 period.

New for 2021 is the addition of a performance “multiplier” based on the Company’s total shareholder return relative to a performance peer group consisting of all companies in the S&P 400 Financials Index (“rTSR”). The addition of this rTSR multiplier is intended to emphasize the Company’s keen focus on delivering superior overall returns to shareholders. Vesting of the 2021 PSUs—as determined solely by net student loan cash flows and ROE—will be multiplied by +/- 20% based on the Company’s rTSR performance over the three-year performance period. If thisperiod, raising the overall maximum potential payout to 180% of the target is achieved, each executive subject to Section 162(m) becomes eligible for the maximum levelnumber of vesting available (i.e., 150%). However, the Committee retained “negative discretion” to reduce the level of vesting using the same criteria established for all other PSU recipients who are not subject to Section 162(m).units and introducing additional “down-side” risk.

 

 (GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)20172021 Proxy Statement (GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)5263

 

73


Summary Compensation Table

 

 

The table below summarizes compensation paid, awarded to or earned by each of our named executive officers (“NEOs”) for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2016,2020, December 31, 2015,2019, and December 31, 2014.2018.

 

NAME AND PRINCIPAL
POSITION(1)
 YEAR(2)  SALARY
($)
  BONUS(3)
($)
  STOCK
AWARDS(4)
($)
  OPTION
AWARDS(4)
($)
  NON-EQUITY
INCENTIVE PLAN
COMPENSATION(5)
($)
  CHANGE IN
PENSION
VALUE
AND
NONQUALIFIED
DEFERRED
COMPENSATION
EARNINGS(6)
($)
  ALL OTHER
COMPENSATION(7)
($)
  TOTAL
($)
Jack Remondi  2016   1,000,000   0   3,079,980   769,999   1,666,500      43,431   6,559,910
President and Chief  2015   1,000,000   0   2,449,978   1,050,000   735,000      39,930   5,274,908
Executive Officer  2014   1,000,000   200,000   3,141,077   1,174,311   807,750      290,586   6,613,724
                                    
Somsak Chivavibul  2016   379,999   0   791,985   197,999   633,270      33,249   2,036,502
Chief Financial  2015   378,846   0   629,993   269,998   242,820      33,077   1,554,734
Officer  2014   330,769   60,000   782,691   253,821   282,712      79,720   1,789,713
                                    
John Kane  2016   449,999   0   1,055,993   263,999   749,925      38,249   2,558,165
Group President,  2015   448,076   0   822,483   352,499   330,750      38,249   1,992,057
Asset Recovery and  2014   382,692   70,000   989,762   334,606   323,100      82,105   2,182,265
Business Services                                   
                                    
Jeff Whorley  2016   449,999   0   1,055,993   263,999   749,925      13,249   2,533,165
Group President,                                   
Asset Management and Servicing                                   
                                    
Tim Hynes  2016   370,000   0   703,995   175,999   616,605      13,249   1,879,848
Chief Risk &  2015   368,269   0   507,476   217,499   271,950      13,249   1,378,443
Compliance Officer  2014   316,346   30,000   618,750   203,821   218,765      58,315   1,445,997
NAME AND PRINCIPAL POSITION(1)YEARSALARY(2)
($)
BONUS(3)
($)
STOCK AWARDS(4)
($)
OPTION
AWARDS(4)
($)
NON-EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN COMPENSATION(5)
($)
CHANGE IN
PENSION
VALUE
AND
NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION EARNINGS(6)
($)
ALL OTHER COMPENSATION(7)
($)
TOTAL
($)
          
Jack Remondi20201,038,46104,999,97202,055,000-8,2748,101,707
President and Chief20191,000,00004,999,98901,785,000-8,3327,793,321
Executive Officer20181,000,00002,799,9971,199,9981,896,000-8,1106,904,105
          
Joe Fisher2020257,8600239,9840305,105-8,137811,086
Chief Financial         
Officer         
          
John Kane2020477,6920999,9720945,300-14,2502,437,214
Group President, Business2019460,0000999,9930821,100-14,0002,295,093
Processing Solutions2018460,0000909,979389,999690,000-38,7502,488,728
          
Mark Heleen2020399,8070749,9790791,175-14,2501,955,211
Chief Legal Officer2019384,9990749,9830687,225-14,0001,836,207
and Secretary2018384,9990524,986224,998729,960-13,7501,878,693
          
Steve Hauber2020363,4610499,9860719,250-14,2501,596,947
Chief Risk and2019345,3840499,9960624,750-14,0001,484,130
Compliance Officer2018310,0000349,977149,999489,800-34,1581,333,934
          
Ted Morris2020295,961150,000249,9780488,062-14,2501,198,251
Controller; Former Acting         
Chief Financial Officer         
          
Christian Lown2020200,00201,199,99400-14,2501,414,246
Former Chief Financial2019400,004700,0001,199,9870714,000-14,0003,027,991
Officer2018400,004700,000839,989359,999758,400-38,7503,097,142
          

 

(1)Reflects the position held by each NEO as of December 31, 2016.2020, except for Messrs. Morris and Lown. Mr. Remondi servedFisher was appointed as President and Chief Executive Officer of the company previously known as SLM Corporation (“Former SLM”) in 2014 until the spin-off of Navient (“Spin-Off”). He became President and Chief Executive Officer of Navient in connection with the Spin-Off. Mr. Chivavibul served as Senior Vice President, Financial Planning & Analysis of Former SLM during 2014 until the Spin-Off, when he became Chief Financial Officer of Navient.effective October 7, 2020. Prior to his appointment, Mr. KaneFisher served as SeniorNavient’s Vice President Enterprise Project Management of Former SLM in 2014. Mr. Kane became Chief Operating Officer of Navient in connection with the Spin-Off,Investor Relations and he assumed his current role as Group President, Asset Recovery and Business Services in June 2015. Mr. Whorley joined Navient in June 2015 as Group President, Asset Management and Servicing. He was not a NEO in either 2014 or 2015. Mr. Hynes served as Senior Vice President, Credit of Former SLM during 2014 until the Spin-Off, when he became Chief Risk & Compliance Officer of Navient.Corporate Development.

 

(2)Navient was spun-off frompays employee salaries in bi-weekly installments throughout the company now known as SLM Corporation (“SLM”) and became an independent public company effective April 30, 2014. Prior tocalendar year. In 2020, the Spin-Off, each of our NEOs (other than Mr. Whorley) was employed by Former SLM; therefore, the information providedCompany’s standard payroll schedule for the portion of 2014 preceding the Spin-Off reflects compensation earned at Former SLM and Former SLM’s executive compensation programs, as well as the positionall salaried employees, including each NEO, held during that period. Accordingly, compensation decisions regarding our NEOs during that period were made by the Former SLM Compensation and Personnel Committee or its delegates.included 27 bi-weekly pay periods.

 

(3)Our NEOs did not receive anyFor Mr. Morris for 2020, reflects the total monthly supplemental bonuses ($30,000 per month) paid to Mr. Morris for each month or portion thereof during which he served as Acting CFO. For Mr. Lown for 2019 and 2018, reflects the one-time deferred signing bonus payments in 2016 or 2015. The Former SLM Compensation and Personnel Committee approvedof $1,400,000 to compensate him for a one-time cash bonus payment in 2014 for Mr. Remondi in recognition of his significant contributions toward the successful completionportion of the Spin-Off. Other senior executives of Former SLM, including Messrs. Chivavibul, Kanelong-term equity and Hynes, received similar one-timedeferred compensation with his former employer that he forfeited by joining Navient in March 2017. This Deferred Signing Bonus was payable in cash bonus payments.in two equal installments on March 17, 2018 and March 17, 2019.

 

(4)Amounts shown are the grant date fair values of the various stock-based awards granted during 2014, 20152018, 2019 and 20162020 computed in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 718. Additional details on accounting for stock-based compensation can be found in “Note 2—Significant Accounting Policies” and “Note 11—Stock-Based Compensation Plans and Arrangements” to the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The “Stock Awards” column also includes thegrant-date fair value of annual incentive awards delivered in the form of fully-vested stock or fully-vested restricted stock units (“RSUs”), as described in Note 5 of this Summary Compensation Table. Performanceperformance stock units (“PSUs”) granted in 2015 and 2016 areawarded during each fiscal year is shown based on the probable performance (target) value of the awards. The maximum grant-date fair value of the PSU awards for 2020 assuming all performance goals were achieved at their grant date fair valuesmaximum levels would be as follows: for each of these years.Mr. Remondi, $4,499,972; for Mr. Kane, $749,979; for Mr. Heleen, $562,477; for Mr. Hauber, $374,989; for Mr. Morris, $93,736; and for Mr. Lown, $899,988.

 

Equity awards granted after the April 30, 2014 effective date of the Spin-Off were delivered in shares or units of Navient Common Stock. Equity awards granted prior to April 30, 2014 were delivered in shares or units of Former SLM Common Stock. These awards were adjusted and converted into Navient and/or SLM equity awards in connection with the Spin-Off, which is described in greater detail in the table of “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End” below, as well as in our Registration Statement filed on Form 10 with the SEC on April 10, 2014. Amounts shown for 2014 include the incremental fair value of these adjusted and converted awards, computed as of the adjustment/conversion date in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, for each of our NEOs ($7,645 for Mr. Remondi; $3,823 for Mr. Chivavibul; $1,274 for Mr. Kane; and $3,823 for Mr. Hynes).

Mr. Lown’s 2020 long-term incentive awards were forfeited in connection with his resignation in May 2020.

 (GRAPHIC)2017 Proxy Statement (GRAPHIC)53

 

(5)Annual incentive awards for 2016 and 2015 were paid to NEOs under the Navient 2016 and 2015 Management Incentive Plan in cash. Annual incentive awards for 2014 were paid to Messrs. Remondi, Chivavibul, Kane and Hynes under the Navient 2014 Management Incentive Plan, with 50 percent of each award delivered in cash and 50 percent delivered in fully-vested RSUs with transfer restrictions that lapse in one-third increments on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date. Only the cash portion of each annual incentive award is shown in this column; the portion of each annual incentive award delivered in Common Stock or RSUs is shown in the “Stock Awards” column.

 

(6)Navient’s non-qualified deferred compensation plan does not provide for above-market or preferential earnings on compensation deferred under the plan.

 

(GRAPHIC)2021 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)64

74

(7)For 2016,2020, the components of “All Other Compensation” were as follows:

 

NAME EMPLOYER
CONTRIBUTIONS
TO DEFINED
CONTRIBUTION
PLANS(A)
($)
 TRANSPORTATION
ALLOWANCE(B)
($)
 ANNUAL PHYSICAL
EXAMINATION(C)
($)
 TOTAL
($)
 EMPLOYER
CONTRIBUTIONS
TO DEFINED
CONTRIBUTION
PLAN (A)
($)
TRANSPORTATION
ALLOWANCE (B)
($)
TOTAL ($)
Remondi   38,250   731   4,450   43,431 7,6925828,274
Chivavibul   33,249         33,249 
Fisher8,13708,137
Kane   38,249         38,249 14,250014,250
Whorley   13,249         13,249 
Hynes   13,249         13,249 
Heleen14,250014,250
Hauber14,250014,250
Morris14,250014,250
Lown14,250014,250

 

(A)Amounts credited to Navient’s tax-qualified defined contribution plan and non-qualified deferred compensation plan.

 

(B)Automobile allowance benefit calculated based on the annual lease method.

 

(C)Senior executives, including our NEOs, are eligible to receive an annual executive physical examination. Messrs. Chivavibul, Kane, Whorley and Hynes did not utilize this allowance in 2016.

For 2014, “All Other Compensation” includes the value of unvested dividend equivalent units (“DEUs”) accrued on units of unvested RSUs during 2014 for the following executives: Messrs. Remondi ($243,570), Chivavibul ($31,849), Kane ($45,111), and Hynes ($29,748).

 (GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)20172021 Proxy Statement (GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)5465

 

75


Grants of Plan-Based Awards

 

 

                      
               ALL OTHER
STOCK
AWARDS:
NUMBER OF
SHARES OF
STOCK OR
UNITS(3)
(#)
 ALL OTHER
OPTION
AWARDS:
NUMBER OF
SECURITIES
UNDERLYING
OPTIONS(4)
(#)
 EXERCISE
OR BASE
PRICE OF
OPTION
AWARDS
($/SHARE)
 GRANT DATE
FAIR VALUE
OF STOCK
AND OPTION
AWARDS(5)
($)
               
   ESTIMATED FUTURE PAYOUTS
UNDER
NON-EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
AWARDS(1)
 ESTIMATED FUTURE PAYOUTS
UNDER
EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
AWARDS(2)
 
   ALL OTHER
STOCK
AWARDS:
NUMBER OF
SHARES OF
STOCK OR
UNITS(3)
(#)
EXERCISE
OR BASE
PRICE OF
OPTION
AWARDS
($/SHARE)
   
         ESTIMATED POSSIBLE PAYOUTS UNDER
NON-EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
AWARDS(1)
 ESTIMATED FUTURE PAYOUTS
UNDER EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
AWARDS(2)
 ALL OTHER
STOCK
AWARDS:
NUMBER OF
SHARES OF
STOCK OR
 GRANT DATE
FAIR VALUE
OF STOCK
 
NAME GRANT DATE Threshold
($)
 Target
($)
 Maximum
($)
 Threshold
(#)
 Target
(#)
 Maximum
(#)
  GRANT DATE Threshold
($)
 Target
($)
 Maximum
($)
 Threshold
(#)
 Target
(#)
 Maximum
(#)
 UNITS(3)
(#)
 AWARDS(4)
($)
 
Remondi Management  1,500,000 2,250,500   Management                 
 Incentive Plan    Incentive Plan - 1,500,000 2,250,000           
 2/3/2016  104,847 209,694 314,541 1,924,990 2/6/2020       106,382 212,765 319,147   2,999,986 
 2/3/2016  125,816 1,154,990 2/6/2020             141,843 1,999,986 
 2/3/2016  762,376 9.18 769,999
Chivavibul Management  570,000 855,000  
 Incentive Plan   
Fisher Management                 
 2/3/2016  26,960 53,921 80,881 494,994 Incentive Plan - 222,704 334,056           
 2/3/2016  32,352 296,991 2/6/2020       - - - 6,382 89,986 
 2/3/2016  196,039 9.18 197,999 10/7/2020             16,648 149,998 
Kane Management  675,000 1,012,500   Management                 
 Incentive Plan    Incentive Plan - 690,000 1,035,000           
 2/3/2016  35,947 71,895 107,842 659,996 2/6/2020       17,730 35,460 53,190   499,986 
 2/3/2016  43,137 395,997 2/6/2020             35,460 499,986 
 2/3/2016  261,386 9.18 263,999
Whorley Management  675,000 1,012,500  
Heleen Management                 
 Incentive Plan    Incentive Plan - 577,500 866,250           
 2/3/2016  35,947 71,895 107,842 659,996 2/6/2020       13,297 26,595 39,892   374,989 
 2/3/2016  43,137 395,997 2/6/2020             26,595 374,989 
 2/3/2016  261,386 9.18 263,999
Hynes Management  555,000 832,500  
Hauber Management                 
 Incentive Plan    Incentive Plan - 525,000 787,500           
 2/3/2016  23,965 47,930 71,895 439,997 2/6/2020       8,865 17,730 26,595   249,993 
 2/3/2016  28,758 263,998 2/6/2020             17,730 249,993 
Morris Management                 
 2/3/2016  174,257 9.18 175,999 Incentive Plan - 356,250 534,375           
 2/6/2020       2,216 4,432 6,648   62,491 
 2/6/2020             13,297 187,487 
Lown(5) Management                 
 Incentive Plan - 600,000 900,000           
 2/6/2020       21,276 42,553 63,829   599,997 
 2/6/2020             42,553 599,997 

 

(1)Represents the possible total payouts for each Navient Named Executive Officer (“NEO”) under the Navient 20162020 Management Incentive Plan (“MIP”). Mr. Fisher’s payout was pro-rated to reflect his appointment at the beginning of the fourth quarter of 2020. The actual amounts earned under the 20162020 MIP and paid in February 20172021 are set forth below.below:
     
  Target
2016 MIP Payout ($)
 Actual 2016
MIP Payout ($)
Mr. Remondi 1,500,000 1,666,500
Mr. Chivavibul 570,000 633,270
Mr. Kane 675,000 749,925
Mr. Whorley 675,000 749,925
Mr. Hynes 555,000 616,605

 Target
2020 MIP Payout ($)
Actual 2020
MIP Payout ($)
Mr. Remondi1,500,0002,055,000
Mr. Fisher222,704305,105
Mr. Kane690,000945,300
Mr. Heleen577,500791,175
Mr. Hauber525,000719,250
Mr. Morris356,250488,062
Mr. Lown600,0000

 

(2)Represents the range of performance stock units (“PSUs”), granted on February 3, 2016,6, 2020, that may vest based on various performance metrics for the three-year performance period from January 1, 2016,2020, through December 31, 2018.2022. See “Long-term Incentive Program” in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis above for additional details regarding the performance metrics associated with these PSUs.

 

(3)Stock awards granted on February 3, 20166, 2020, to Messrs. Remondi, Fisher, Kane, Heleen, Hauber, Morris and Lown represent restricted stock units (“RSUs”) that have vested or will vest and convert into shares of Common Stock in one-third increments on February 3, 2017,6, 2021, February 3, 20186, 2022 and February 3, 2019.

(4)Navient stock options6, 2023. Stock awards granted in 2016on October 7, 2020 to NEOs have vested orMr. Fisher represent RSUs that will vest and convert into shares of Common Stock in one-third increments on February 3, 2017, February 3, 2018October 7, 2021, October 7, 2022 and February 3, 2019.October 7, 2023.

 

(5)(4)Amounts disclosed for awards granted in 20162020 represent the grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Additional details on accounting for stock-based compensation can be found in “Note 2—Significant Accounting Policies” and “Note 11—Stock-Based Compensation Plans and Arrangements” to the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

(5)Mr. Lown’s 2020 long-term incentive awards were forfeited in connection with his resignation in May 2020.

(GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)20172021 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)5566

 

76

 

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End

 

The table below sets forth information regarding Navient equity awards that were outstanding as of December 31, 2016.2020.

 

OPTION AWARDS STOCK AWARDS
NAME GRANT
DATE(1)
 NUMBER OF
SECURITIES
UNDERLYING
UNEXERCISED
OPTIONS
EXERCISABLE
(#)
 NUMBER OF
SECURITIES
UNDERLYING
UNEXERCISED
OPTIONS
UNEXERCISABLE(2)
(#)
 OPTION
EXERCISE
PRICE
($)
 OPTION
EXPIRATION
DATE
 NUMBER
OF
SHARES
OR UNITS
OF
STOCK
THAT
HAVE
NOT
VESTED(3)
(#)
 MARKET
VALUE OF
SHARES OR
UNITS OF
STOCK
THAT HAVE
NOT
VESTED(4)
($)
 EQUITY
INCENTIVE
PLAN
AWARDS:
NUMBER OF
UNEARNED
SHARES,
UNITS OR
OTHER
RIGHTS
THAT
HAVE NOT
VESTED(5)
(#)
 EQUITY
INCENTIVE
PLAN
AWARDS:
MARKET OR
PAYOUT
VALUE OF
UNEARNED
SHARES,
UNITS, OR
OTHER
RIGHTS
THAT HAVE
NOT
VESTED(4)(5)
($)
Remondi 1/8/2008 2,000,000  11.0960 1/8/2018    
  1/8/2009 1,000,000  6.5230 1/8/2019    
  1/27/2011 80,000  9.3771 1/27/2021    
  2/3/2012 173,210  10.2558 2/3/2017    
  2/7/2013 256,107  11.4873 2/7/2018    
  5/1/2014 339,641 169,820 17.0000 5/1/2019    
  2/18/2015 156,250 312,500 21.6500 2/18/2020    
  2/3/2016 0 762,376 9.1800 2/3/2021    
  2/4/2014     62,334 $1,024,147  
  2/18/2015     23,570 387,255  
  2/18/2015       44,193 $726,090
  2/3/2016     131,917 2,167,396  
  2/3/2016       219,862 3,612,332
Chivavibul 1/27/2011 40,000  9.3771 1/27/2021    
  2/7/2013 43,663  11.4873 2/7/2018    
  5/1/2014 72,780 36,390 17.0000 5/1/2019    
  2/18/2015 40,178 80,357 21.6500 2/18/2020    
  2/3/2016 0 196,039 9.1800 2/3/2021    
  2/4/2014     8,015 131,686  
  5/1/2014     4,390 72,127  
  2/18/2015     6,062 99,598  
  2/18/2015       11,363 186,694
  2/3/2016     33,920 557,305  
  2/3/2016       56,535 928,870
Kane 1/27/2011 13,333  9.3771 1/27/2021    
  2/7/2013 54,579  11.4873 2/7/2018    
  5/1/2014 97,040 48,520 17.0000 5/1/2019    
  2/18/2015 52,455 104,911 21.6500 2/18/2020    
  2/3/2016 0 261,386 9.1800 2/3/2021    
  2/4/2014     9,797 160,964  
  5/1/2014     6,587 108,224  
  2/18/2015     7,912 129,994  
  2/18/2015       14,836 243,755
  2/3/2016     45,228 743,096  
  2/3/2016       75,381 1,238,509
Whorley 6/1/2015 50,761 101,523 19.3400 6/1/2020    
  2/3/2016 0 261,386 9.1800 2/3/2021    
  6/1/2015     11,221 184,361  
  2/3/2016     45,228 743,096  
  2/3/2016       75,381 1,238,509
Hynes 5/13/2008 100,000  13.9310 5/13/2018    
  1/28/2010 50,000  6.6127 1/28/2020    
  1/27/2011 40,000  9.3771 1/27/2021    
  2/7/2013 42,572  11.4873 2/7/2018    
  5/1/2014 58,224 29,112 17.0000 5/1/2019    
  2/18/2015 32,366 64,732 21.6500 2/18/2020    
  2/3/2016 0 174,257 9.1800 2/3/2021    
  2/4/2014     8,015 131,686  
  5/1/2014     2,196 36,080  
  2/18/2015     4,883 80,227  
  2/18/2015       9,154 150,400
  2/3/2016     30,152 495,397  
  2/3/2016       50,254 825,673
                   
        OPTION AWARDS       STOCK AWARDS    
NAME(1) GRANT
DATE(2)
 NUMBER OF
SECURITIES
UNDERLYING
UNEXERCISED
OPTIONS
EXERCISABLE
(#)
 NUMBER OF
SECURITIES
UNDERLYING
UNEXERCISED
OPTIONS
UNEXERCISABLE(3)
(#)
 OPTION
EXERCISE
PRICE ($)
 OPTION
EXPIRATION
DATE
 NUMBER
OF
SHARES
OR UNITS OF
STOCK
THAT
HAVE
NOT
VESTED (4)
(#)
 MARKET
VALUE OF
SHARES OR
UNITS OF
STOCK
THAT HAVE
NOT
VESTED(5)
($)
 EQUITY
INCENTIVE
PLAN
AWARDS:
NUMBER OF
UNEARNED
SHARES,
UNITS OR
OTHER RIGHTS
THAT
HAVE NOT
VESTED(6)
(#)
 EQUITY
INCENTIVE
PLAN
AWARDS:
MARKET OR
PAYOUT
VALUE OF
UNEARNED
SHARES,
UNITS, OR
OTHER
RIGHTS
THAT HAVE
NOT
VESTED(5)
($)
 
Remondi  1/27/2011  80,000  -  9.3771  1/27/2021  -  -  -  - 
   2/3/2016  762,376  -  9.1800  2/3/2021  -  -  -  - 
   2/6/2017  297,397  -  15.4800  2/6/2022  -  -  -  - 
   2/5/2018  308,880  154,440  13.6300  2/5/2023  -  -  -  - 
   2/5/2018  -  -  -  -  22,552  221,460  -  - 
   2/5/2018  -  -  -  -  146,553  1,439,150  -  - 
   2/5/2019  -  -  -  -  127,410  1,251,166  -  - 
   2/5/2019  -  -  -  -  -  -  299,104  2,937,201 
   2/6/2020  -  -  -  -  147,621  1,449,638  -  - 
   2/6/2020  -  -  -  -  -  -  231,142  2,269,814 
Fisher  2/5/2018  -  -  -  -  3,001  29,469  -  - 
   2/5/2019  -  -  -  -  6,381  62,661  -  - 
   2/6/2020  -  -  -  -  6,933  68,082  -  - 
   10/7/2020  -  -  -  -  16,933  166,282  -  - 
Kane  1/27/2011  13,333  -  9.3771  1/27/2021  -  -  -  - 
   2/3/2016  261,386  -  9.1800  2/3/2021  -  -  -  - 
   2/6/2017  107,806  -  15.4800  2/6/2022  -  -  -  - 
   2/5/2018  100,386  50,193  13.6300  2/5/2023  -  -  -  - 
   2/5/2018  -  -  -  -  7,652  75,142  -  - 
   2/5/2018  -  -  -  -  47,628  467,706  -  - 
   2/5/2019  -  -  -  -  33,234  326,357  -  - 
   2/5/2019  -  -  -  -  -  -  49,850  489,527 
   2/6/2020  -  -  -  -  38,522  378,286  -  - 
   2/6/2020  -  -  -  -  -  -  38,522  378,286 
Heleen  2/6/2017  55,762  -  15.4800  2/6/2022  -  -  -  - 
   2/5/2018  57,915  28,957  13.6300  2/5/2023  -  -  -  - 
   2/5/2018  -  -  -  -  4,414  43,345  -  - 
   2/5/2018  -  -  -  -  27,477  269,824  -  - 
   2/5/2019  -  -  -  -  23,881  234,511  -  - 
   2/5/2019  -  -  -  -  -  -  37,387  367,140 
   2/6/2020  -  -  -  -  27,667  271,689  -  - 
   2/6/2020  -  -  -  -  -  -  28,892  283,719 
Hauber  1/27/2011  8,333  -  9.3771  1/27/2021  -  -  -  - 
   2/3/2016  138,613  -  9.1800  2/3/2021  -  -  -  - 
   2/6/2017  39,033  -  15.4800  2/6/2022  -  -  -  - 
   2/5/2018  38,610  19,305  13.6300  2/5/2023  -  -  -  - 
   2/5/2018  -  -  -  -  2,943  28,900  -  - 
   2/5/2018  -  -  -  -  18,318  179,882  -  - 
   2/5/2019  -  -  -  -  16,617  163,178  -  - 
   2/5/2019  -  -  -  -  -  -  24,925  244,763 
   2/6/2020  -  -  -  -  19,261  189,143  -  - 
   2/6/2020  -  -  -  -  -  -  19,261  189,143 
Morris  2/3/2016  92,409  -  9.1800  2/3/2021  -  -  -  - 
   2/6/2017  39,033  -  15.4800  2/6/2022  -  -  -  - 
   2/5/2018  21,235  10,618  13.6300  2/5/2023  -  -  -  - 
   2/5/2018  -  -  -  -  5,666  55,640  -  - 
   2/5/2019  -  -  -  -  12,462  122,376  -  - 
   2/5/2019  -  -  -  -  -  -  6,231  61,188 
   2/6/2020  -  -  -  -  14,445  141,849  -  - 
   2/6/2020  -  -  -  -  -  -  4,814  47,273 

(GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)20172021 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)5667

 

77

 

(1)Mr. Lown did not have any outstanding equity awards as of December 31, 2020.

(2)Navient was spun-off from the company now known as SLM Corporation (“SLM”) and became an independent public company effective April 30, 2014. PriorImmediately prior to the Spin-Off, each of our NEOs (other than Messrs. Lown and Heleen) was employed by the company previously known as SLM Corporation (“Former SLM”). Former SLM equity awards outstanding on April 30, 2014, were adjusted and converted into Navient awards and SLM awards. In general, the adjusted and converted equity awards are subject to substantially the same terms and conditions as the original Former SLM equity awards, including the original vesting schedule. The continuous service of each NEO with Former SLM (pre-Spin-Off) and Navient (post-Spin-Off) will behas been taken into account for vesting purposes. Additional details regarding the adjustment and conversion of Former SLM equity awards can be found in Navient’s Registration Statement filed on Form 10 with the SEC on April 10, 2014. This table reflects only Navient equity awards that were outstanding as of December 31, 2016.2020.

 

(2)(3)Stock options granted in 20132018 vested in one-third increments on each of February 7, 2014,5, 2019, February 7, 2015,5, 2020, and February 7, 2016. Certain vesting price targets associated with stock options5, 2021.

(4)RSUs granted in 2013 were met prior to the April 30, 2014 effective date of the Spin-Off, and are no longer applicable. Stock options granted in 2014 to Messrs. Remondi, Chivavibul, Kane and Hynes have2018 vested or will vest in one-third increments on each of May 1, 2015, May 1, 2016,February 5, 2019, February 5, 2020 and May 1, 2017. Stock optionsFebruary 5, 2021. RSUs granted in 2015 to Mr. Whorley have vested or will vest in one-third increments on each of June 1, 2016, June 1, 2017, and June 1, 2018. Stock options granted in 2015 to other NEOs have vested or will vest in one-third increments on each of February 18, 2016, February 18, 2017, and February 18, 2018. Stock options granted in 20162019 have vested or will vest in one-third increments on February 3, 2017,5, 2020, February 3, 20185, 2021 and February 3, 2019.

(3)Restricted stock units (“RSUs”) granted in 2013 to Messrs. Chivavibul, Kane and Hynes vested and were converted into shares of Common Stock in one-third increments on each of February 7, 2014, February 7, 2015 and February 7, 2016.5, 2022. RSUs granted in 2014 to Messrs. Remondi, Chivavibul, Kane and Hynes vested and were converted into shares of Common Stock in one-third increments on each of February 4, 2015, February 4, 2016 and February 4, 2017. RSUs granted in 2015 to Mr. Whorley have vested or will vest and be converted into shares of Common Stock in one-third increments on each of June 1, 2016, June 1, 2017 and June 1, 2018. RSUs granted in 2015 to other NEOs have vested or will vest and be converted into shares of Common Stock in one-third increments on each of February 18, 2016, February 18, 2017, and February 18, 2018. RSUs granted in 20162020 have vested or will vest in one-third increments on February 3, 2017,6, 2021, February 3, 20186, 2022 and February 3, 2019.

6, 2023. RSUs granted to Mr. Fisher in October 2020 will vest in one-third increments on October 7, 2021, October 7, 2022 and October 7, 2023. PSUs granted in 2018 vested after a three-year performance period (2018-20), with the potential payout ranging from 0% to 150% of the target number of units. Based on the Company’s actual performance during the three-year performance period relative to pre-established performance goals, these PSUs vested at 83% of the target number of units and were settled in shares of the Company’s common stock on March 2, 2021. These 2018-20 PSUs are shown above as outstanding on December 31, 2020 based on the final vested amount (i.e., 83% of the target number of units). See “2018-20 Performance Stock Units” in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis above for additional details regarding these PSUs. Amounts include all accrued and unvested whole share dividend equivalent units (“DEUs”) that vest only to the extent and at the same time that the underlying award on which they are issued vest.

 

(4)(5)Market value of shares or units is calculated based on the closing market price of $16.43$9.82 for Navient Common Stock on December 30, 2016.31, 2020.

 

(5)(6)

Performance stock units (“PSUs”)PSUs granted in 20152019 will vest after a three-year performance period (2015-2017)(2019-21), with the potential payout ranging from 0% to 130%150% of the target awardnumber of units based on a combination of (i) aggregate cash flows net of secured borrowings from all student loans (including private credit finance loans) over the performance period; and (ii) annual “Core Earnings” Return on Equity for each year in the performance period. “Core Earnings” Return on Equity is a non-GAAP financial measure that does not represent a comprehensive basis of accounting. “Core Earnings” Return on Equity is a percentage equal to the Company’s “cumulative core“core earnings” net income”income for each of fiscal years 2019, 2020 and 2021, divided by average stockholder’s equity for each such performance period combined with an additional vesting modifier basedyear (determined using the average balance of stockholder’s equity on “strategic growth cumulative corea “core earnings” basis for each quarter in a given year), using yearly “core earnings” net income” that can increase or decreaseincome as shown in the payout by an additional 20%. Overall payoutsegment reporting footnote in the Company’s audited financial statements as a percentagepublished in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K, excluding the impact of target cannot exceed 156% of the target award.any regulatory and restructuring costs. Assuming the Company meets or exceeds these performance levels, the PSUs will vest on the second business day after the Company files with the SEC its annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year 2017 with the SEC,2021, and in no event later than March 15, 2018.2022. Amounts include all accrued and unvested whole share DEUs that vest only to the extent and at the same time that the underlying award on which they are issued vest. The number of units and payout value reported is based on achieving thresholdtarget performance goals. Due to the impactSee discussion of 2015 performance on these2019-21 PSUs it is uncertain to what extent they will vest, if at all.

PSUs granted in 2016 will vest after a three-year performance period (2016-2018), with the potential payout ranging from 0% to 150% of the target award based on a combination of (i) aggregate cash flows from student loans (net of secured borrowings) over the performance period; (ii) cumulative revenue from growth businesses over the performance period; and (iii) the attainment of certain strategic objectives intended to highlight a limited number of critical, non-formulaic goals that management is focusing on over the next three years. Assuming the Company meets or exceeds these performance levels, the PSUs will vest on the second business day after the Company files its annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year 2018 with the SEC, and in no event later than March 15, 2019. Amounts include all accrued and unvested whole share DEUs that vest only to the extent and at the same time that the underlying award on which they are issued vest. See “Long-term Incentive Program” in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis above for additional details regarding the performance metrics associated with these PSUs.

 

PSUs granted in 2020 will vest after a three-year performance period (2020-22), with the potential payout ranging from 0% to 150% of the target number of units based on a combination of (i) aggregate cash flows net of secured borrowings from all student loans (including private credit finance loans) over the performance period; and (ii) annual “Core Earnings” Return on Equity for each year in the performance period. “Core Earnings” Return on Equity is a non-GAAP financial measure that does not represent a comprehensive basis of accounting. “Core Earnings” Return on Equity is a percentage equal to the Company’s “core earnings” net income for each of fiscal years 2020, 2021 and 2022, divided by average stockholder’s equity for each such year (determined using the average balance of stockholder’s equity on a “core earnings” basis for each quarter in a given year), using yearly “core earnings” net income as shown in the segment reporting footnote in the Company’s audited financial statements as published in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K, excluding the impact of any regulatory and restructuring costs. Assuming the Company meets or exceeds these performance levels, the PSUs will vest on the second business day after the Company files with the SEC its annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year 2022, and in no event later than March 15, 2023. Amounts include all accrued and unvested whole share DEUs that vest only to the extent and at the same time that the underlying award on which they are issued vest. The number of units and payout value reported is based on achieving target performance goals. See discussion of 2020-22 PSUs in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis above for additional details regarding the performance metrics associated with these PSUs.

(GRAPHIC)2021 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)68

78

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

 

 

Option Awards Stock Awards Option AwardsStock Awards
NAMENUMBER OF SHARES
ACQUIRED
ON EXERCISE(1)
(#)
 VALUE REALIZED
ON EXERCISE(2)
($)
 NUMBER OF SHARES
ACQUIRED ON VESTING(3)
(#)
 VALUE REALIZED ON
VESTING(4)
($)
 NUMBER OF SHARES
ACQUIRED
ON EXERCISE (1)

(#)
VALUE REALIZED
ON EXERCISE (2)

($)
NUMBER OF SHARES
ACQUIRED ON
VESTING (3)

(#)
VALUE REALIZED ON
VESTING (4)

($)
Remondi 00 174,339 1,829,956 0 0 277,481 3,470,876 
Chivavibul 37,636 159,734 20,245 212,198
Fisher 0 0 8,691 122,382 
Kane 13,636 57,873 26,317 279,368 0 0 92,292 1,151,701 
Whorley 00 5,419 73,644
Hynes 00 17,426 176,217
Heleen 79,868 441,670 52,441 656,568 
Hauber 0 0 26,367 335,522 
Morris 0 0 17,058 240,194 
Lown 0 0 52,680 574,599 

 

(1)Mr. ChivavibulHeleen exercised 37,63679,868 net-settled stock options on November 9, 2016,February 14, 2020, with a strike price of $10.2558$9.18 and a market price of $14.50, and received 7,175 net shares. Mr. Kane exercised 13,636 net-settled stock options on November 9, 2016, with a strike price of $10.2558 and a market price of $14.50, and received 2,586$14.71, receiving 20,458 net shares.

 

(2)The value realized upon exercise is the number of net-settled stock options exercised multiplied by the difference between the market price of Navient Common Stock at exercise and the strike price on the net-settled options.

 

(GRAPHIC)2017 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)57

(3)Represents shares acquired upon the vesting of restricted stock units (“RSUs”), the associated dividend equivalent units (“DEUs”) and any fractional share settlement. (4) The value realized on vesting is the number of shares vested multiplied by the closing market price of Navient Common Stock on the vesting date.

 

(4)The value realized on vesting is the number of shares vested multiplied by the closing market price of Navient Common Stock on the vesting date.

 

Pension Benefits

 

 

The Company has no tax-qualified pension plans and no non-qualified supplemental pension plans.

 

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation

 

 

Under the Navient Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”), eligible employees, including our NEOs, may elect to defer up to 80 percent of their annual cash-based compensation. Each year, an employee who has completed one year of service generally is eligible to receive aThe Company contribution in an amount equaldoes not make any contributions to the greater of: (i) five percent (5%) of the participant’s annual “eligible compensation,”Deferred Compensation Plan effective for periods on or (ii) five percent (5%) of the participant’s annual deferral amount; provided, however, that the Company contribution for a given year will not exceed the participant’s annual deferral amount. For this purpose, “eligible compensation” is the employee’s annual cash-based compensation in excess of the annual compensation limit applicable to tax-qualified retirement plans, up to a maximum of $500,000.after January 1, 2019.

 

All participant deferrals and Company contributions are credited to bookkeeping accounts. Amounts in each participant’s account are indexed to one or more investment alternatives chosen by the participant from a range of market-based alternatives. The Deferred Compensation Plan does not pay above-market or preferential earnings. Participants elect the time and form of payment of their accounts. Accounts generally are paid no sooner than the first day of the seventh month following the participant’s termination of employment, although certain in-service distributions are permitted. Immediate distributions upon the death or disability of the participant also are permitted. Accounts generally may be distributed either in a single lump sum or in up to ten (10) annual installments.

 

The following table on the following page provides information regarding contributions and earnings under the Deferred Compensation Plan in 2016,2020, as well as year-end account balances, for each of our NEOs.

 

(GRAPHIC)2021 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)69

Name EXECUTIVE
CONTRIBUTIONS IN
2016
($)
 REGISTRANT
CONTRIBUTIONS IN
2016(1)
($)
 AGGREGATE
EARNINGS IN
2016
($)
 AGGREGATE
WITHDRAWALS /

DISTRIBUTIONS IN
2016
($)
 AGGREGATE
BALANCE AT
12/31/2016
($)
Remondi 25,000 25,000 30,518 0 768,991
Chivavibul 19,999 19,999 16,206 0 278,778
Kane 25,000 25,000 25,840 0 247,102
Whorley 0 0 0 0 0
Hynes 0 0 15,628 0 205,517
79

NAME EXECUTIVE
CONTRIBUTIONS IN
2020 (1)

($)
REGISTRANT
CONTRIBUTIONS IN
2020 (2)

($)
AGGREGATE
EARNINGS IN 2020
($)
AGGREGATE
WITHDRAWALS /
DISTRIBUTIONS IN
2020
($)
AGGREGATE
BALANCE AT
12/31/2020 (3)

($)
Remondi 0 0 387,649 0 1,665,324 
Fisher 0 0 1,760 0 11,389 
Kane 185,265 0 71,871 0 759,107 
Heleen 0 0 0 0 0 
Hauber 0 0 74,855 0 332,792 
Morris 0 0 3,010 0 19,406 
Lown 0 0 11,165 (71,969) 0 

 

(1)Registrant Contributions listed hereExecutive contributions are included underwithheld from the heading “Employer Contributions to Defined Contribution Plans”executive’s salary and/or non-equity incentive compensation for the relevant fiscal year and are reflected in Footnote 7 tothe relevant column in the Summary Compensation Table.Table for that year.

 

(GRAPHIC)2017 Proxy Statement(2)(GRAPHIC)58The Company does not make any contributions to the Deferred Compensation Plan effective for periods on or after January 1, 2019.

 

(3)The aggregate balance at fiscal year-end reflects current and prior fiscal year executive and registrant contributions previously reported in the Summary Compensation Table for those years for executives who were named executive officers in those years.

 

Arrangements with Named Executive Officers

 

 

Navient has not entered into an employment agreement with any of its NEOs. However, our NEOs (other than Mr. Lown) participate in the company’sCompany’s severance plans for senior officers, and each of our NEOs (other than Mr. Lown) is entitled to certain severance payments pursuant to the terms and conditions of those plans, which are described below.

 

Executive Severance Plan

 

Under Navient’s Executive Severance Plan for Senior Officers, eligible officers will receive a lump sum cash payment equal to (i) a multiple of base salary and an average annual incentive award (determined over the last 24 months), plus (ii) pro-ratedprorated target annual incentive award for the year of termination, upon the following events: (a) resignation from employment for good reason (as defined in the plan); (b) the Company’s decision to terminate an eligible officer’s employment for any reason other than for cause (as defined in the plan), death or disability; or (c) upon mutual agreement of the Company and the eligible officer. The multiplier for each eligible officer position is as follows: CEO-2;CEO-2x; Executive and Senior Vice Presidents-1x. Each of our NEOs other than Mr. Remondi, Mr. Morris (Senior Vice President) and Mr. Lown (no longer employed by Navient) holds the title of Executive Vice President-1.President. Under the plan, in no event will a severance payment exceed a multiple of three times an officer’s base salary and annual incentive award.

 

In addition to the cash severance payment, eligible officers will receive subsidized medical benefits and outplacement services for 18 months (24 months for the CEO). Treatment of outstanding equity awards upon severance is governed by the terms of the applicable equity award agreement and not the severance plan.

 

Change in Control Severance Plan

 

Under Navient’s Change in Control Severance Plan for Senior Officers, if a termination of employment for reasons defined in the plan occurs within 24 months following a change in control of the Company, the participant is entitled to receive a lump sum cash payment equal to two times the sum of his or her base salary and average annual incentive award (based on the prior two years). A participant will also be entitled to receive a pro-rated portion of his or her target annual incentive award for the year in which the termination occurs, as well as continuation of medical benefits for a two-year period. Treatment of outstanding equity awards upon a change in control is governed by the terms of the applicable equity award agreement and not the severance plan. Under the plan,equity award agreements, outstanding equity awards become vested and non-forfeitable in connection with a change in control only if (i) the participant’s employment is terminated, or (ii) the acquiring or surviving entity does not assume the equity awards. The plan does not allow for tax gross-ups.

 

(GRAPHIC)2021 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)70

80

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

 

 

The tables below reflect the amount of compensation that would have been payable to each of our NEOs (other than Mr. Lown, who werewas no longer employed as an executive officersofficer of Navient on December 31, 2016,2020), under various scenarios including if such individual’s employment had terminated and/or a change in control had occurred on December 31, 2016,2020, given the individual’s compensation and service levels as of December 31, 2016,2020, and based on Navient’s closing stock price of $9.82 per share on December 30, 201631, 2020, the last trading date of $16.43 per share.the year. The amounts disclosed in the tables below are in addition to: (i) compensation and benefits available prior to the occurrence of a termination of employment, such as vested stock options, and (ii) compensation and benefits available generally to all employees, such as distributions under Navient’s defined contribution retirement program, disability plans and accrued vacation pay.

 

The following severance arrangements were effective for our NEOs (other than Mr. Lown) who were employed as executive officers of Navient on December 31, 2016:2020: (i) the Navient Corporation Executive Severance Plan for Senior Officers,as amended and restated, (ii) the Navient Corporation Change in Control Severance Plan for Senior Officers, as amended and restated, and (iii) the Navient Corporation 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan.Plan, as amended and restated. Mr. Lown, who is not included in the tables below, did not receive any severance payments or benefits in connection with his resignation in May 2020.

 (GRAPHIC)2017 Proxy Statement (GRAPHIC)59

 

Change in Control Without Termination

 

NameEquity
Vesting(1)
($)
Cash
Severance
($)
Medical
Insurance /
Outplacement
($)
Total
($)
Remondi----
ChivavibulFisher----
Kane----
WhorleyHeleen----
HynesHauber----
Morris----

 

(1)Under the Change in Control Severance Plan for Senior Officers,equity award agreements, outstanding equity awards become vested and non-forfeitable in connection with a change in control only if (i) the participant’s employment is terminated, or (ii) the acquiring or surviving entity does not assume the equity awards. For purposes of this table, we have assumed that neither of these conditions is satisfied.

 

Change in Control and (i) Termination without Cause, or (ii) Termination for Good Reason

 

NameEquity
Vesting(2)
($)
Cash
Severance
($)
Medical
Insurance /
Outplacement(3)

($)
Total
($)
 Equity
Vesting(2)
($)
Cash
Severance
($)
Medical
Insurance /
Outplacement(3)
($)
Total
($)
Remondi14,170,5395,901,50025,27020,097,309 9,568,431 7,340,000 25,819 16,934,250 
Chivavibul3,584,2752,206,09022,8655,813,230
Fisher 326,495 1,659,739 26,096 2,012,330 
Kane4,763,3482,655,67522,1207,441,143 2,115,306 3,376,400 15,350 5,507,056 
Whorley4,061,0152,612,47515,7276,689,217
Hynes3,133,2282,183,55525,2705,342,053
Heleen 1,470,230 2,825,900 25,819 4,321,949 
Hauber 995,011 2,569,000 25,819 3,589,830 
Morris 428,329 1,838,250 26,096 2,292,675 

 

(2)For stock and stock unit awards, the amounts shown reflect the closing market price of Navient Common Stock on December 30, 201631, 2020 ($16.43)9.82). For stock options where the December 30, 201631, 2020 closing market price of Navient Common Stock was higher than the option exercise price, the amounts reflect the intrinsic value of the options as if they had been exercised on December 30, 2016.31, 2020. PSUs granted in 2018 vested at 83% of the target number of units based on Company performance over a three-year performance period (2018-20) and were settled on March 2, 2021. See discussion of 2018-20 PSUs in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis above for additional details. These 2018 PSUs are valued based on the number of PSUs actually earned for the three-year performance period ending on December 31, 2020.

 

(3)Includes Navient’s estimated portion of the cost of health care benefits for 24 months.

 

(GRAPHIC)2021 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)71

81

Termination without Cause or Termination for Good Reason

 

NameEquity
Vesting(4)
($)
Cash
Severance
($)
Medical
Insurance /
Outplacement(5)

($)
Total
($)
 Equity
Vesting(4)
($)
Cash
Severance
($)
Medical
Insurance /
Outplacement(5)
($)
Total
($)
Remondi5,901,50040,2705,941,770 -7,340,000 55,819 7,395,819 
Chivavibul1,388,04532,1481,420,193
Fisher -1,092,369 49,572 1,141,941 
Kane1,665,33731,5901,696,927 -2,033,200 41,512 2,074,712 
Whorley1,523,73726,7951,550,532
Hynes1,369,27733,9521,403,229
Heleen -1,701,700 49,364 1,751,064 
Hauber -1,547,000 49,364 1,596,364 
Morris -1,097,250 34,572 1,131,822 

 

(4)By their terms, in the event of a termination without cause or a termination for good reason, outstanding Navient equity awards generally continue to vest pursuant to the vesting schedule set forth in each applicable award agreement as if the NEO remains employed by Navient through the pre-established vesting date. The value of 2019-21 PSUs and 2020-22 PSUs that would continue to vest is dependent on the achievement of the performance goals at the end of the applicable performance period. The value as of December 31, 2020 of 2018-20 PSUs and RSUs that would continue to vest is equal to the total of the amounts reported for each NEO in the “Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Yet Vested“ column on the Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End table, above. All stock options that would continue to vest had a strike price that exceeded the price of a share of Navient Common Stock as of December 31, 2020.

 

(5)As President and Chief Executive Officer of Navient, Mr. Remondi is entitled to Navient’s estimated portion of the cost of health care benefits for a period of 24 months plus $15,000$30,000 of outplacement services. Amounts for Messrs. Chivavibul,Fisher, Kane, Whorley,Heleen and HynesHauber include Navient’s estimated portion of the cost of health care benefits for 18 months, plus $30,000 of outplacement services. Amounts for Mr. Morris include Navient’s estimated portion of the cost of health care benefits for 18 months, plus $15,000 of outplacement services.

 

 (GRAPHIC)2017 Proxy Statement (GRAPHIC)60

Termination for Cause or Resignation (other than for Good Reason or Retirement)

 

NameEquity
Vesting(6)
($)
Cash
Severance
($)
Medical
Insurance /
Outplacement
($)
Total
($)
Remondi----
ChivavibulFisher----
Kane----
WhorleyHeleen----
HynesHauber----
Morris----

 

(6)Vested and unvested equity awards are forfeited upon Termination for Cause (as defined in the Navient Corporation 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan).Plan, as amended and restated) or resignation other than for Good Reason or Retirement.

 

Termination upon Retirement

 

NameEquity
Vesting(7)
($)
Cash
Severance
($)
Medical
Insurance /
Outplacement
($)
Total
($)
Remondi----
ChivavibulFisher----
Kane----
WhorleyHeleen----
HynesHauber----
Morris----

 

(7)As of December 31, 2016, Messrs.Mr. Remondi and Chivavibul wereis eligible for retirement vesting of his outstanding equity awards pursuant to their terms and the Company’s retirement policy. Similarly, Mr. Heleen is eligible for retirement vesting of a portion of his outstanding equity awards. Outstanding equity awards generally continue to vest pursuant to the vesting schedule set forth in each applicable award agreement as if the NEO remains employed by Navient through the pre-established vesting date, provided that the NEO satisfies certain age and/or service conditions set forth in each company’sthe Company’s retirement policy. For equity awards originally granted by Former SLM prior to 2013, the award recipient must be age 60 or older upon retirement, or the award recipient must have attained a combination of age and years of service totaling at least 70 years, to be eligible for retirement vesting. For equity awards originally granted by Former SLM in 2013 or 2014, and for all Navient equity awards, theThe award recipient must be age 65 or older upon retirement, or the award recipient must have attained a combination of age and years of service totaling at least 75 years, to be eligible for retirement vesting. Service with both Former SLM and Navient is counted for these purposes. See footnote 4 above for the values of equity awards that would continue to vest for Mr. Remondi and Mr. Heleen.

(GRAPHIC)2021 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)72

82

 

Termination by Death or Disability

 

NameEquity
Vesting(8)
($)
Cash
Severance
($)
Medical
Insurance / Outplacement
($)
Total
($)
 Equity
Vesting(8)
($)
 Cash
Severance
($)
 Medical
Insurance /
Outplacement
($)
 Total
($)
 
Remondi14,170,53914,170,539 9,568,431 - - 9,568,431 
Chivavibul3,584,2753,584,275
Fisher 326,495 - - 326,495 
Kane4,763,3484,763,348 2,115,306 - - 2,115,306 
Whorley4,061,0154,061,015
Hynes3,133,2283,133,228
Heleen 1,470,230 - - 1,470,230 
Hauber 995,011 - - 995,011 
Morris 428,329 - - 428,329 

 

(8)The vesting of all outstanding equity awards will accelerate upon termination of employment due to death or disability. For stock and stock unit awards, the amounts shown reflect the closing market price of Navient Common Stock on December 30, 201631, 2020 ($16.43)9.82). For stock options where the December 30, 201631, 2020, closing market price of Navient Common Stock was higher than the option exercise price, the amounts reflect the intrinsic value of the options as if they had been exercised on December 30, 2016.31, 2020. PSUs granted in 2018 vested at 83% of the target number of units based on Company performance over a three-year performance period (2018-20) and were settled on March 2, 2021. See discussion of 2018-20 PSUs in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis above for additional details. These 2018 PSUs are valued based on the number of PSUs actually earned for the three-year performance period ending on December 31, 2020.

 

Actual Payments uponUpon Termination

 

 

EachMr. Lown resigned from the Company on May 29, 2020. He did not receive any severance payments or benefits or accelerated vesting of our NEOs remained employed by Navient as an executive officer on December 31, 2016.

 (GRAPHIC)2017 Proxy Statement (GRAPHIC)61

Proposal 4 — Approvalany equity awards upon his separation, other than payment of the Amendedearned and Restated Navient Corporation 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan

In April 2014, we established the Navient Corporation 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Incentive Plan”), which authorized the issuance of up to 45,000,000 shares of Common Stockvested retirement benefits pursuant to equity incentives granted to employeesthe terms of those plans. Mr. Lown’s 2020, 2019 and non-employee directors. Our sole shareholder at the time, the company now known as SLM Corporation, approved the Incentive Plan on April 8, 2014. We amended the Incentive Plan2018 long-term incentive awards were forfeited in early April 2015 to impose a minimum vesting requirement on stock optionsconnection with his resignation, and stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) grantedMr. Lown did not receive any payment under the Incentive Plan, and to clarify the plan’s restrictions on share recycling. Our shareholders subsequently approved the material terms of the Incentive Plan on May 21, 2015.

On April 4, 2017, the Board approved, on recommendation of the Compensation Committee, an amendment to the Incentive Plan increasing the number of shares authorized for issuance under the plan from 45,000,000 to 55,000,000, and making certain other changes to the Incentive Plan. The Board believes that the new share reserve should be sufficient for a period of five years, taking into account the potential addition of new board members and grant increases over at least that period.

We have also redesigned the Incentive Plan to conform to current corporate governance best practices. Key changes we have made in the design of the Incentive Plan include:

We have eliminated discretionary vesting of awards other than upon death, disability or change in control;

We have added a minimum one-year vesting requirement to all equity award types, subject to a five percent carve-out; and

We have specified that performance-based equity awards not assumed or converted upon a change in control will vest based on actual performance achieved to the date of the change in control.

Consistent with best practices, the Incentive Plan continues to prohibit:

automatic single-trigger vesting of time-based awards upon a change in control, except for awards that are not assumed by or converted into awards of the acquirer;

the payment of dividends or dividend equivalents on unvested awards of all award types until the awards vest;

the repricing or cash buyout of option and SAR awards other than in connection with a stock split or other recapitalization event;

“reload” options or SARs; and

liberal share recycling.

In addition, awards under the Incentive Plan continue to be subject to clawback in the event of a material misstatement of the Company’s financial statements or performance resulting from a senior officer’s conduct, or in the event a senior officer commits fraud or other misconduct or materially violates corporate policy. The Company does not provide for tax gross-ups on any awards under the2020 Management Incentive Plan.

 

This proposalCEO Pay Ratio

Pursuant to approve the amendedDodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and restated Incentive Plan requiresConsumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), the affirmative voteSEC adopted a rule requiring Navient to disclose annually: (i) the annual total compensation of the holdersmedian employee identified by Navient (as described below), (ii) the annual total compensation of a majorityNavient’s principal or chief executive officer (“CEO”), and (iii) the estimated ratio of the Common Stock present, represented and entitled to vote, and voting affirmatively or negatively at the Annual Meeting. Accordingly, shares that are not voted affirmatively or negatively with respect to this proposal, including abstentions and broker non-votes, will not be relevant to the outcome.these two amounts.

 

The following summary is qualified inTo identify our median employee, we reviewed the annual compensation of all full-time, part-time, seasonal and temporary employees of Navient and its entirety by reference to the Incentive Plan, which is attached to this proxy statement asAppendix A.

Summary of the Incentive Plan

In General.The Incentive Plan is administered by the Compensation and Personnel Committee (the “Compensation Committee”) of our Board, except that the non-employee members of the Board administer awards for non-employee directors. The Incentive Plan provides for various types of awards to be granted to participants, including awards both in cash and in or with respect to Common Stock and both short-term and long-term awards. Under the Incentive Plan, options

 (GRAPHIC)2017 Proxy Statement (GRAPHIC)62

to purchase shares of Common Stock and stock appreciation rights, or SARs, may be granted, but the per share exercise price cannot be less than the fair market value per share of the Common Stock on the date of grant. Options and SARs must have fixed terms no longer than ten years. No dividend equivalent rights or units are permitted to be granted on options or SARs. In addition, repricing of options and SARs is prohibited under the Incentive Plan without approval of our shareholders, and options and SARs may not be cancelled in exchange for cash or other awards. Any stock awards (including options, SARs, restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance units) generally are subject to a minimum vesting period of one year from the date of grant, except that earlier vesting of such awards may occur in the events of death, disability or change in control. However, 5% of the total number of shares of Common Stock available for issuance under the Incentive Plan will not be subject to this minimum vesting period. The Incentive Plan also provides for cash awards.

Shares Reserved. The Incentive Plan provides that the maximum number of shares of our Common Stock as to which awards, under the plan, may be granted is 55,000,000 shares, which is referred to as the maximum share limit, all of which may be issued as incentive stock options under Code Section 422. If an award expires or is terminated, cancelled or forfeited, the shares of Common Stock associated with the expired, terminated, cancelled or forfeited award will again be available for awards under the Incentive Plan. However, shares of Common Stock subject to awards that have been retained or withheld by the Company in payment or satisfaction of the exercise price, purchase price or tax withholding obligation of an award and shares of Common Stock that have been delivered to the Company in payment or satisfaction of the exercise price, purchase price or tax withholding obligation of an award are not again available for awards under the Incentive Plan. This prohibition against share recycling includes (i) shares of Common Stock that have been tendered or withheld in payment of an option, (ii) shares of Common Stock repurchased by the Company with option proceeds, and (iii) shares of Common Stock covered by a SAR, to the extent the SAR is exercised and settled in shares of Common Stock, and whether or not shares of Common Stock are actually issued to a participant upon exercise of the SAR.

Of the original 45,000,000 shares available for awards under the Incentive Plan, 23,072,624 shares were utilized in May 2014 to adjust and convert outstanding SLM Corporation (“SLM”) equity awards in connection with our separation from SLM. Additional details regarding the adjustment and conversion of SLM equity awards can be found in Navient’s Information Statement filed on Form 10 with the SEC on April 10, 2014 (our “Form 10”). As of March 30, 2017, the number of shares subject to outstanding stock option awards was 14,799,240, with a weighted average strike price of $12.36 and weighted average remaining life of 2.56 years, and the number of shares subject to outstanding full value awards was 4,657,313, for a total of 19,456,553 outstanding equity awards. The number of shares available for future awards under the Incentive Plan was 10,009,153affiliated companies as of March 30, 2017.

Award Limits. Under the Incentive Plan, no employee may be granted, in any calendar year period: (i) awards exercisable, covering or relating to more than 2,500,000 shares of Common Stock; or (ii) cash awards, restricted stock unit awards or performance unit awards that may be settled solely in cash having a value greater than $5,000,000. In addition, the aggregate grant-date value of all awards granted to any non-employee director during any single calendar year may not exceed $650,000.

Adjustments.The Incentive Plan providesDecember 31, 2020. As permitted under SEC rules, we treated an employee’s 2020 “annual compensation” for appropriate adjustments in the number of shares of Common Stock subject to awards and available for future awards, the exercise price of outstanding awards,this purpose as well as the maximum award limits under the Incentive Plan, in the event of changes in the outstanding Common Stock by reason of a merger, stock split or certain other events.

Eligibility.Employees and directors of the Company and its subsidiaries, and prospective employees and directors selected by the Compensation Committee or, in the case of directors, the non-employee members of the Board, are eligible to participate in the Incentive Plan. As of March 30, 2017, there were approximately 880 employees (including 6 executive officers) and 11 non-employee directors who were eligible to receive awards under the Incentive Plan.

Stock Options.The Compensation Committee determines, in connection with each option granted to employees, and the non-employee members of the Board, in the case of grants to non-employee directors, the exercise price, whether that price is payable in cash (and whether that may include proceeds of a sale assisted by a third party) or shares of Common Stock or both, the terms and conditions of exercise, the expiration date, whether the option will qualify as an incentive stock option under Code Section 422 or a nonqualified stock option, restrictions on transfer of the option, and other provisions not inconsistent with the Incentive Plan. The term of an option will not exceed ten years from the date of grant. Options may not include provisions that “reload” the option upon exercise.

Stock Appreciation Rights. Every SAR entitles the participant, on exercise of the SAR, to receive in cash or shares of Common Stock a value equal to the excess of the fair market value of a specified number of shares of Common Stock at the time of exercise, over the exercise price established by the Compensation Committee or the non-employee members of the

 (GRAPHIC)2017 Proxy Statement (GRAPHIC)63

Board, as applicable. A SAR may be granted in tandem with an option, and a holder of a tandem SAR may elect to exercise either the option or the SAR, but not both. The Compensation Committee or the non-employee members of the Board, as applicable, will determine the terms, conditions and limitations applicable to any SARs, including the term of any SARs, which may not be longer than ten years, and the date or dates upon which they become vested and exercisable. SARs may not include provisions that “reload” the SAR upon exercise.

Restricted Stock. The terms, conditions and limitations applicable to a restricted stock award, including any restriction period, will be determined by the Compensation Committee or the non-employee members of the Board, as applicable.

Restricted Stock Units. Restricted stock unit awards may be granted and/or settled in the form of cash or in shares of Common Stock (or in a combination thereof) equal to the value of the vested restricted stock unit award. The terms, conditions and limitations applicable to a restricted stock unit award, including any restriction period and the right to dividend equivalents, will be determined by the Compensation Committee or the non-employee members of the Board, as applicable.

Performance Units. Each performance unit has an initial value that is established by the Compensation Committee on the date of grant. After the applicable performance period has ended, the value of the performance unit is determined as a function of the extent to which the corresponding performance goals were achieved. The Compensation Committee may settle earned performance units in the form of cash or in shares of Common Stock (or in a combination thereof) equal to the value of the earned performance units as soon as practicable after the end of the performance period and following the Compensation Committee’s determination of actual performance against the performance measures and related goals established by the Compensation Committee.

Minimum Vesting Period for Stock Awards. Any options, SARs, restricted stock, restricted stock units, or performance units granted under the Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, are subject to a minimum vesting period of one year from the date of grant, except that earlier vesting of such awards may occur in the events of death, disability or change in control. However, 5% of the total number of shares of Common Stock available for issuance under the Incentive Plan will not be subject to this minimum vesting period.

Performance Awards. Any award available under the Incentive Plan may be structured as a performance award. Performance awards not intended to qualify as qualified performance-based compensation under Code Section 162(m) will be based on achievement of such goals and will be subject to such terms, conditions and restrictions as the Compensation Committee may determine.

Performance awards granted under the Incentive Plan that are intended to qualify as qualified performance-based compensation under Code Section 162(m) will be paid, vested or otherwise deliverable solely on account of the attainment of one or more pre-established, objective performance goals established by the Compensation Committee. One or more of such goals may apply to the employee, one or more business units, divisions or sectors of Navient, or Navient as a whole, and if so desired by the Compensation Committee, by comparison with a peer group of companies. Performance awards may be based on any one or more of the following measures: (a) cash flow (including operating cash flow, free cash flow, cash flow return on capital, or cash flow per share), (b) core earnings per share (including earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization), (c) return measures (including return on assets, capital, equity, or sales), (d) total shareholder return, (e) productivity ratios, (f) expense targets or ratios, (g) revenue, (h) core income or net income, (i) core operating income or net operating income, (j) operating profit or net operating profit, (k) gross or operating margin, (l) return on operating revenue, (m) market share, (n) loan volume, (o) loan delinquencies, (p) loan defaults, (q) loan credit indicators (including FICO, co-borrower, payments made, GPA and graduation), (r) overhead or other expense reduction, (s) charge-off levels, (t) deposit growth, (u) margins, (v) operating efficiency, (w) economic value added, (x) customer or employee satisfaction, (y) debt reduction, (z) capital targets, (aa) consummation of acquisitions, dispositions, projects or other specific events or transactions, (bb) liquidity, (cc) capital adequacy, (dd) ratio of nonperforming to performing assets, (ee) ratio of common equity to total assets, or (ff) regulatory compliance metrics.

The performance measures described above are included in the Incentive Plan to enable the Compensation Committee, if it chooses to do so, to make stock awards or cash awards that qualify as qualified performance-based compensation under Code Section 162(m). The Compensation Committee can satisfy such requirements by, among other things, including provisions in awards that will make them payable solely on account of the attainment of one or more pre-established, objective performance goals based on performance measures that have been approved by our shareholders. Although the Compensation Committee is not required to include such provisions in awards, the inclusion of such provisions and compliance with certain other requirements of Code Section 162(m) would enable the Company to deduct from its taxable income the related compensation that it might not otherwise be able to deduct.

 (GRAPHIC)2017 Proxy Statement (GRAPHIC)64

The Compensation Committee may provide in any particular performance award agreement that any evaluation of performance may include or exclude certain events that occur during a performance period, including but not limited to: (a) amortization, depreciation or impairment of tangible or intangible assets, (b) litigation or claim judgments or settlements, (c) the effect of changes in tax law, accounting principles or other laws or provisions affecting reported results, (d) accruals for reorganization and restructuring programs or reductions in force or early retirement programs, (e) any unusual or infrequently occurring items that may be defined in an objective and non-discretionary manner under or by reference to U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, accounting standards or other applicable accounting standards in effect from time to time and/or in management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations appearing in the our annual report to shareholders for the applicable year, (f) the sale of investments or non-core assets; (g) discontinued operations, categories or segments; (h) investments, acquisitions or dispositions; (i) political, legal and other business interruptions (such as due to war, insurrection, riot, terrorism, confiscation, expropriation, nationalization, deprivation, seizure, and regulatory requirements); (j) natural catastrophes; (k) currency fluctuations; (l) stock-based compensation expense; (m) early retirement of debt; (n) conversion of convertible debt securities; and (o) termination of real estate leases. Awards that are intended to qualify as qualified performance-based awards may not be adjusted upward but the Compensation Committee may retain the discretion to adjust upward awards not intended as qualified performance-based awards. The Compensation Committee may retain the discretion to adjust any performance awards downward, either on a formulaic or discretionary basis or any combination, as the Compensation Committee determines.

Vesting Upon Change in Control. As amended and restated, the Incentive Plan requires “double-trigger” vesting provisions for all equity awards upon a change in control. Each award will become vested and non-forfeitable in connection with a change in control only if (i) the participant’s employment is terminated, or (ii) the acquiring or surviving entity does not assume the award. Performance-based equity awards will vest based on the performance terms of the award and based on actual performance achieved to the date of the change in control.

Duration; Plan Amendments. The Incentive Plan will expire by its terms on April 7, 2024. The Board may at any time amend, modify, suspend or terminate the Incentive Plan (and the Compensation Committee may amend or modify an award agreement) but in doing so cannot adversely affect any outstanding award without the participant’s written consent or make any amendment without shareholder approval, to the extent such shareholder approval is otherwise required by applicable legal requirements.

Unfunded Plan.The Incentive Plan is unfunded. Although we may establish bookkeeping accounts with respect to participants who are entitled to cash, Common Stock or rights thereto under the Incentive Plan, we will use any such accounts merely as a bookkeeping convenience. We are not required to segregate any assets that may at any time be represented by cash, Common Stock or rights thereto, nor will the Incentive Plan be construed as providing for such segregation, nor will Navient, our Board or our Compensation Committee be deemed to be a trustee of any cash, Common Stock or rights thereto to be granted under the Incentive Plan. Any liability or obligation of Navient to any participant with respect to an award of cash, Common Stock or rights thereto under the Incentive Plan will be based solely on any contractual obligations that the Incentive Plan and any award agreement create, and no such liability or obligation of Navient will be deemed to be secured by any pledge or other encumbrance on any property of Navient. None of Navient, our Board or our Compensation Committee will be required to give any security or bond for the performance of any obligation that the Incentive Plan creates.

New Plan Benefits. Future awards under the Incentive Pan, as amended and restated, will be determined in the discretion of the Compensation Committee or the non-employee members of the Board and, as a result, it is not possible to determine the awards that will be granted to eligible employees or non-employee directors under the Incentive Plan at this time. During the Company’s 2016 fiscal year, the Company granted awards under the Incentive Plan to the Company’s Named Executive Officers as reported in the “Grants of Plan Based Awards Table” and to its non-employee directors as reported in the “Non-Employee Director Compensation Table,” in each case as described elsewhere in this proxy statement. During fiscal year 2016, the Company also granted awards with respect to 2,556,503 shares of the Company’s Common Stock (with an aggregate grant-date value of $8.965 million) to its executive officers as a group and awards with respect to 4,110,815 shares of the Company’s Common Stock (with an aggregate grant-date value of $20.892 million) to its non-executive employees as a group.

As of April 7, 2017, the latest practicable date before the filing of this proxy statement, the closing price per share of the Company’s Common Stock was $14.68.

 (GRAPHIC)2017 Proxy Statement (GRAPHIC)65

Material Federal Income Tax Consequences of Awards under the Incentive Plan

The following summary is based on current interpretations of existing federal income tax laws. The discussion below is not purported to be complete, and it does not discuss the tax consequences arising in the context of the participant’s death or the income tax laws of any locality, state or foreign country in which a participant’s grants, income or gain may be taxable.

Stock Options.Some of the options issuable under the Incentive Plan may constitute incentive stock options, while other options granted under the Incentive Plan may be nonqualified stock options. The Code provides for special tax treatment of stock options qualifying as incentive stock options, which may be more favorable to employees than the tax treatment accorded nonqualified stock options. On grant of either form of option, the optionee will not recognize income for tax purposes and we will not receive any deduction. Generally, on the exercise of an incentive stock option, the optionee will recognize no income for U.S. federal income tax purposes. However, the difference between the exercise price of the incentive stock option and the fair market value of the shares at the time of exercise is an adjustment in computing alternative minimum taxable income that may require payment of an alternative minimum tax. On the sale of shares of Common Stock acquired by exercise of an incentive stock option (assuming that the sale does not occur within two years of the date of grant of the option or within one year of the date of exercise), any gain will be taxed to the optionee as long-term capital gain. In contrast, on the exercise of a nonqualified option, the optionee generally recognizes taxable income (subject to withholding) in an amount equal to the difference between the fair market value of the shares of Common Stock acquired on the date of exercise and the exercise price. On any sale of those shares by the optionee, any difference between the sale price and the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise of the nonqualified option will be treated generally as capital gain or loss. No deduction is available to the Company on the exercise of an incentive stock option (although a deduction may be available if the employee sells the shares acquired on exercise before the applicable holding periods expire); however, on exercise of a nonqualified stock option, we generally are entitled to a deduction in an amount equal to the income recognized by the employee. Except in the case of the death or disability of an optionee, an optionee has three months after termination of employment in which to exercise an incentive stock option and retain favorable tax treatment on exercise. An incentive stock option exercised more than three months after an optionee’s termination of employment other than on death or disability of an optionee cannot qualify for the tax treatment accorded incentive stock options. Any such option would be treated as a nonqualified stock option for tax purposes.

Stock Appreciation Rights.The amount of any cash or the fair market value of any shares of Common Stock received by the holder on the exercise of SARs in excess of the exercise price will be subject to ordinary income tax in the year of receipt, and we will be entitled to a deduction for that amount.

Restricted Stock.Generally, a grant of shares of Common Stock under the Incentive Plan subject to vesting and transfer restrictions will not result in taxable income to the participant for federal income tax purposes or a tax deduction to the Company at the time of grant. The value of the shares will generally be taxable to the participant as compensation income in the year in which the restrictions on the shares lapse. Such value will be the fair market value of the shares as to which the restrictions lapse on the date those restrictions lapse. Any participant, however, may elect pursuant to Code Section 83(b) to treat the fair market value of the restricted shares on the date of grant as compensation income in the year of grant, provided the Compensation Committee or Board, as applicable, permits the election and the participant makes the election pursuant to Code Section 83(b) within 30 days after the date of grant. In any case, we will receive a deduction for federal income tax purposes equal to the amount of compensation included in the participant’s income in the year in which that amount is so included.

Restricted Stock Units.A grant of a right to receive shares of Common Stock or cash in lieu of the shares will result in taxable income for federal income tax purposes to the participant at the time the award is settled in an amount equal to the fair market value of the shares or the amount of cash awarded. We will be entitled to a corresponding deduction at such times for the amount included in the participant’s income.

Performance Units. The amount of any cash or the fair market value of any shares of Common Stock received by the holder on the settlement of performance units under the Incentive Plan will be subject to ordinary income tax in the year of receipt, and we will be entitled to a deduction for that amount in the year in which that amount is included.

Cash Awards. Cash awards under the Incentive Plan are taxable income to the participant for federal income tax purposes at the time of payment. The participant will have compensation income equal to the amount of cash paid, and we will have a corresponding deduction for federal income tax purposes.

 (GRAPHIC)2017 Proxy Statement (GRAPHIC)66

Basis; Gain. A participant’s tax basis in vested shares of Common Stock acquired under the Incentive Plan is equal to the sum of the price paid for the shares, if any, and the amount of ordinaryhis or her gross income, recognized by the participantas reported on payroll records, plus all employer contributions to Navient’s qualified retirement plan made on the transferemployee’s behalf. In identifying the median employee, we excluded the CEO. As of vested shares.December 31, 2020, Navient and its affiliated companies had approximately 7,500 employees, all of whom reside in the United States or a U.S. territory.

Navient’s CEO is Mr. Remondi. His annual total compensation for 2020 was $8,101,707, as reflected in the Summary Compensation Table. The participant’s holding period2020 annual total compensation of the median employee identified by Navient, calculated in accordance with SEC rules regarding the Summary Compensation Table, was $40,126. Accordingly, Navient’s estimated 2020 pay ratio was 1 to 202.

SEC rules for identifying the shares beginsmedian employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’s annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their employee populations and compensation practices. As a result, the transferpay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the participantNavient pay ratio reported above, as other companies have different employee populations and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios. In addition, the median employee’s annual total compensation is unique to that individual and therefore is not an indicator of vested shares. If a participant sells shares,the annual total compensation of any difference between the amount realized in the sale and the participant’s tax basis in the shares is taxed as long-termother individual or short-term capital gain or loss (provided the shares are held as a capital asset on the dategroup of sale), depending on the participant’s holding period for the shares.employees.

(GRAPHIC)2021 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)73

83

Other Matters

 

Certain Tax Code Limitations on Deductibility. In order for the Company to deduct the amounts described above, such amounts must constitute reasonable compensation for services rendered or to be rendered and must be ordinary and necessary business expenses. The ability to obtain a deduction for awards under the Incentive Plan could also be limited by Code Section 280G, which provides that certain excess parachute payments made in connection with a change in control of an employer are not deductible. The ability to obtain a deduction for amounts paid under the Incentive Plan could also be affected by Code Section 162(m), which limits the deductibility, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, of compensation paid to certain employees to $1 million during any taxable year. However, certain exceptions apply to this limitation in the case of qualified performance-based compensation. It is intended that the approval of the Incentive Plan by our shareholders will satisfy the shareholder approval requirement for the qualified performance-based exception and we will be able to comply with the requirements of the Code and Treasury Regulation Section 1.162-27 as they relate to the grant and payment of certain qualified performance-based awards (including Options and SARs) under the Incentive Plan so as to be eligible for the qualified performance-based exception. In certain cases, we may determine it is in our interests to not satisfy the requirements for the qualified performance-based exception.

Code Section 409A. Code Section 409A generally provides that deferred compensation subject to Code Section 409A that does not meet the requirements for an exemption from Code Section 409A must satisfy specific requirements, both in operation and in form, regarding: (i) the timing of payment; (ii) the election of deferrals; and (iii) restrictions on the acceleration of payment. Failure to comply with Code Section 409A may result in the early taxation (and in some cases, plus interest) to the participant of deferred compensation and the imposition of a 20% additional tax imposed on the participant with respect to the deferred amounts included in the participant’s income.

 (GRAPHIC)2017 Proxy Statement (GRAPHIC)67

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table summarizes information as of December 31, 2016, relating to our equity compensation plans or arrangements pursuant to which grants of options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock units or other rights to acquire shares may be granted from time to time.

PLAN CATEGORY NUMBER OF
SECURITIES TO
BE ISSUED UPON
EXERCISE OF
OUTSTANDING
OPTIONS AND
RIGHTS(1)
 WEIGHTED
AVERAGE
EXERCISE
PRICE OF
OUTSTANDING
OPTIONS AND
RIGHTS
($)
 AVERAGE
REMAINING
LIFE (YEARS)
OF OPTIONS
OUTSTANDING
 NUMBER OF
SECURITIES
REMAINING
AVAILABLE
FOR FUTURE
ISSUANCE
UNDER EQUITY
COMPENSATION
PLANS
Equity compensation plans approved by        
security holders:        
         
Navient Corporation 2014 Omnibus        
Incentive Plan        
Traditional options 151,100 25.24 0.4  
Net-settled options 4,596,742 12.32 3.0  
RSUs 3,803,139    
PSUs 871,944    
Total 9,422,925 12.73 3.0 12,740,947
         
Employee Stock Purchase Plan(2)   0.0 616,462
Total approved by security holders 9,422,925 12.73 3.0 13,357,409
Total not approved by security holders    

(1)Upon exercise of a net-settled option, optionees are entitled to receive the after-tax spread shares only. The spread shares equal the gross number of options granted less shares for the option cost. Accordingly, this column reflects the net-settled option spread shares issuable at December 31, 2016, where provided.

(2)Number of shares available for issuance under the Navient Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) as of December 31, 2016. The ESPP was approved on April 8, 2014 by the company now known as SLM Corporation, then our sole shareholder. The ESPP became effective May 1, 2014.

Board Recommendation

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR APPROVAL OF THE AMENDED AND RESTATED NAVIENT CORPORATION 2014 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN.

(GRAPHIC)2017 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)68

Other Matters

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

 

 

Navient maintains a written policy regarding review and approval of transactions with related parties. Transactions covered by the policy include any transaction involving Navient and an amount in excess of $120,000 in any year in which any director, nominee, executive officer, greater-than-five percent beneficial owner of the Company, or any of their respective immediate family members, has or had a direct or indirect material interest, other than as a director or less-than-ten percent owner of an entity involved in the transaction (a “Related Party Transaction”). Certain loans made in the ordinary course of Navient’s business to executive officers, directors and their family members are considered Related Party Transactions and may be required to be disclosed in the proxy statement but are pre-approved under the policy if they meet specified requirements. As of the date of this proxy statement, no such loans are outstanding.

 

As previously reported, the separation of Navient from SLM Corporation (the “Spin-Off”) was completed on April 30, 2014 (the “Distribution Date”). The separation was effected through the distribution by then SLM Corporation (“SLM”), on a one-to-one basis, of all of the shares of Common Stock of Navient (the “Distribution”) to the holders of shares of SLM Common Stock as of the close of business on April 22, 2014, the record date for the Distribution. As a result of the Distribution, Navient became an independent, publicly-traded company. To ensure a timely separation and migration of the customer data and information technology functions between Navient Solutions, Inc. (“NSI”) and SLM during the 24-month transition period subsequent to the Spin-Off, SLM acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of a class of preferred stock (the “Special Preferred”) issued by NSI, the principal operating subsidiary of Navient at the time. The Special Preferred afforded SLM certain approval rights that terminated upon the redemption of the Special Preferred on the two-year anniversary of the Spin-Off on April 30, 2016. In addition to the Special Preferred, Navient and SLM entered into various other agreements designed to enable cooperation during the 24-month transition period. During 2016 Navient made payments to SLM in the amount of $566,249 and received payments from SLM in the amount of $11,996,843. For additional information relating to the Special Preferred or the Spin-Off transaction generally, see our Form 10 and the section captioned “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions” in the information statement filed as Exhibit 99.1 to our Form 10 which was filed with the SEC on April 10, 2014.

From the beginning of 20162020 until the present, there have been no (and there are no currently proposed) transactions involving an amount in excess of $120,000 in which Navient was (or is to be) a participant and any executive officer, director, five percent beneficial owner of our Common Stock or member of the immediate family of any of the foregoing persons had (or will have) a direct or indirect material interest, except the compensation arrangements described in this proxy statement for our named executive officers and directors.directors and the following transactions: As disclosed previously, on January 27, 2020, the Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Audit Committee, approved the repurchase of 20,346,464 shares of our common stock from certain subsidiaries and affiliates of Canyon Capital Advisors LLC and certain of its subsidiaries for an aggregate purchase price of $300,517,273.28. Additionally, Ms. Kathryn Miceli, sister-in-law of Joe Fisher, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer, has been employed at Navient as Director, Private Credit Reporting since February 20, 2010. During 2020, Ms. Miceli received compensation in the amount of $173,288, which consists of base salary, bonus compensation and equity incentive compensation. Ms. Miceli’s compensation is comparable to the compensation paid to other employees in similar positions.

 

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires Navient’s executive officers and directors, as well as persons who beneficially own more than 10 percent of the Common Stock, to file reports with the SEC on their ownership and changes in ownership of Navient Common Stock. Based solely on a review of the copies of such forms in our possession and on written representations from reporting persons, we believe that during the period from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016 all required reports were filed in a timely manner, with the exception of the following: (1) Three Form 4 filings with respect to John M. Kane, Timothy J. Hynes and Somsak Chivavibul, which were filed to report the disposition of 2,162, 727 and 1,427 shares respectively on May 4, 2016, should have been filed no later than May 3, 2016, and (ii) one Form 4 filing for Diane Suitt Gilleland, a non-employee director, which was filed to report the disposition of 10,000 shares filed on November 17, 2016, should have been filed on no later than November 16, 2017.

Other Matters for the 20172021 Annual Meeting

 

 

As of the date of this proxy statement, there are no matters that the Board of Directors intends to present for a vote at the Annual Meeting other than the business items discussed in this proxy statement. In addition, Navient has not been notified of any other business that is proposed to be presented at the Annual Meeting that has not been withdrawn.Meeting. If other matters now unknown to the Board of Directors come before the Annual Meeting, the proxy given by a shareholder electronically,

(GRAPHIC)2017 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)69

telephonically or on a proxy card gives discretionary authority to the persons named by Navient to serve as proxies to vote such shareholder’s shares on any such matters in accordance with their best judgment.

 

Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

A Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and officers and persons who own more than 10% of our Common Stock to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC and Nasdaq and to furnish us with copies of the reports. Specific due dates for these reports have been established and we are required to report in this Proxy Statement any failure by directors, officers and greater-than-10% holders to file such reports on a timely basis. Based on our review of such reports and written representations from our directors and officers, we believe that all such filing requirements were met with respect to 2020 with the exception of a single Form 4 filed on behalf of Joe Fisher upon his appointment as the Company’s Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer. The Company was late in reporting this transaction because of a delay in its receipt of the appropriate SEC filing codes.

(GRAPHIC)2021 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)74

84

Shareholder Proposals for the 20182022 Annual Meeting

 

 

A shareholder who intends to introduce a proposal for consideration at Navient’s 20182022 Annual Meeting may seek to have that proposal and a statement in support of the proposal included in the Company’s 20182022 proxy statement if the proposal relates to a subject that is permitted under SEC Rule 14a-8. To be considered for inclusion, the proposal and supporting statement must be received by the Company no later than December 15, 2017,10, 2021 and must satisfy the other requirements of Rule 14a-8. The submission of a shareholder proposal does not guarantee that it will be included in Navient’s proxy statement.

 

Navient’s Bylaws provide that a shareholder may otherwise propose business for consideration or nominate persons for election to the Board of Directors, in compliance with federal proxy rules, applicable state law and other legal requirements and without seeking to have the proposal included in the Company’s proxy statement pursuant to Rule 14a-8. Navient’s Bylaws provide that any such proposals or nominations for the Company’s 20182022 Annual Meeting must be received by it on or after January 25, 2018,20, 2022, and on or before February 26, 2018.19, 2022. Any such notice must satisfy the other requirements in Navient’s Bylaws applicable to such proposals and nominations. If a shareholder fails to meet these deadlines or fails to comply with the requirements of SEC Rule 14a-4(c), Navient may exercise discretionary voting authority under proxies it solicits to vote on any such proposal.

 

Proxy Access Procedures

The Company's Second Amended and Restated Bylaws generally permit a shareholder, or group of up to 20 shareholders, owning at least 3% of our outstanding shares for at least three years to nominate, and include in the Company's proxy materials, director nominees constituting up to the greater of two or 20% of the Company's Board, provided that the shareholder(s) and nominee(s) satisfy the requirements in our bylaws. Written notice of proxy access director nominees must be received no later than the close of business on the 120th day, nor earlier than the close of business on the 150th day, prior to the first anniversary of the date our definitive proxy statement was first sent to stockholders in connection with the preceding year's annual meeting. With respect to the 2022 Annual Meeting, this notice must be received between November 10, 2021 and December 10, 2021, assuming the date of the 2022 Annual Meeting is not changed by more than 30 days before or after the first anniversary of the 2021 Annual Meeting. Any notices should be addressed to Chief Legal Officer and Secretary, Navient Corporation, 123 Justison Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801.

Solicitation Costs

 

 

All expenses in connection with the solicitation of proxies for the Annual Meeting will be paid by Navient. We have engaged MacKenzie Partners, Inc. to solicit proxies for an estimated fee of $15,000 plus reimbursement for out-of-pocket costs. In addition, officers, directors, regularcertain employees or other agents of Navient may solicit proxies in person, by telephone, telefax, personal calls, or other electronic means. Navient will request banks, brokers, custodians and other nominees in whose names shares are registered to furnish to the beneficial owners of Navient’s Common Stock Notices of Availability of the materials related to the Annual Meeting, and including, if so requested by the beneficial owners, paper copies of our 2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K, this proxy statement and the proxy card and, upon request, the Company will reimburse such registered holders for their out-of-pocket and reasonable expenses in connection therewith.

 

Householding

 

 

To reduce the expense and reduce environmental effects of printing and delivering duplicate proxy materials to shareholders who may have more than one account holding Navient stock but share the same address, Navient has adopted a procedure approved by the SEC called “householding.” Under this procedure, certain registered shareholders who have the same address and last name, and who do not participate in electronic delivery of proxy materials, will receive one copy of the Notice of Internet Availability and, as applicable, any additional proxy materials that are delivered until such time as one or more of these shareholders notifies us that they want to receive separate copies. Shareholders who participate in householding will continue to have access to and utilize separate proxy voting instructions.

(GRAPHIC)2021 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)75

85

 

If you are a registered shareholder and would like to have separate copies of the Notice of Internet Availability or proxy materials mailed to you in the future, or you would like to have a single copy of the Notice of Internet Availability or proxy materials mailed to you in the future, you must submit a request in writing to Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York 11717 or call at 1-800-542-1061. If you are a beneficial shareholder, please contact your bank or broker to opt in or out of householding.

 

However, please note that if you are a registered shareholder and wish to receive a separate proxy card or vote instruction form or other proxy materials for purposes of this year’s Annual Meeting, you should follow the instructions included in the Notice of Internet Availability that was sent to you and we will deliver promptly upon written or oral request, separate copies of the proxy materials for this year’s Annual Meeting.

 

(GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)20172021 Proxy Statement(GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)7076

 



APPENDIX A

NAVIENT CORPORATION

2014 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN

Amended and Restated as of April 4, 2017


NAVIENT CORPORATION

2014 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN

Table of Contents

  Page
   
1.Plan1
   
2.Objectives1
   
3.Definitions1
   
4.Eligibility4
   
5.Common Stock Available for Awards4
   
6.Administration5
   
7.Delegation of Authority6
   
8.Employee Awards6
   
9.Director Awards8
   
10.Award Payment; Dividends and Dividend Equivalents8
   
11.Option Exercise9
   
12.Taxes9
   
13.Amendment, Modification, Suspension or Termination9
   
14.Assignability9
   
15.Adjustments10
   
16.Change of Control11
   
17.Restrictions11
   
18.Unfunded Plan11
   
19.Code Section 409A11
   
20.Awards to Foreign Nationals and Employees Outside the United States12
   
21.Governing Law12
   
22.Right to Continued Service or Employment12
   
23.Usage12
   
24.Headings12
   
25.Effectiveness12

NAVIENT CORPORATION

2014 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN

1.Plan

Navient Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), established this Navient Corporation 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan (this “Plan”), effective as of April 7, 2014 (the “Effective Date”). The Company amended and restated the Plan effective April 6, 2015, to impose a minimum vesting requirement on stock options and stock appreciation rights granted under the Plan, and to clarify the Plan’s restrictions on share recycling, and again on April 4, 2017 to add shares to the Plan and make certain other changes. This Plan shall continue in effect for a term of 10 years after the Effective Date unless sooner terminated by action of the Board of Directors of the Company.

2.Objectives

This Plan is designed to attract and retain employees of the Company and its Subsidiaries (as defined herein), to attract and retain qualified non-employee directors of the Company, to encourage the sense of proprietorship of such employees and directors and to stimulate the active interest of such persons in the development and financial success of the Company and its Subsidiaries. These objectives are to be accomplished by making Awards under this Plan and thereby providing Participants (as defined herein) with a proprietary interest in the growth and performance of the Company and its Subsidiaries.

3.Definitions.As used herein, the terms set forth below shall have the following respective meanings:

Authorized Officer” means the Chairman of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company or the senior human resources officer of the Company (or any other senior officer of the Company to whom any of such individuals shall delegate the authority to execute any Award Agreement).

Award” means the grant of any Option, Stock Appreciation Right, Stock Award, or Cash Award, any of which may be structured as a Performance Award, whether granted singly, in combination or in tandem, to a Participant pursuant to such applicable terms, conditions, and limitations as the Committee may establish in accordance with the objectives of this Plan.

Award Agreement” means the document (in written or electronic form) communicating the terms, conditions and limitations applicable to an Award. The Committee may, in its discretion, require that the Participant execute such Award Agreement, or may provide for procedures through which Award Agreements are made available but not executed. Any Participant who is granted an Award and who does not affirmatively reject the applicable Award Agreement shall be deemed to have accepted the terms of Award as embodied in the Award Agreement.

Board” means the Board of Directors of the Company.

Cash Award” means an Award denominated in cash.

Cause” means, unless otherwise defined in an award agreement, either (i) a willful and continuing failure of a Participant to perform substantially his duties and responsibilities (other than as a result of the Participant’s death or Disability) and, if in the judgment of the Committee such willful and continuing failure may be cured by a Participant, that such failure has not been cured by the Participant within ten (10) business days after written notice of such was given to the Participant by the Committee, or (ii) that the Participant has committed an act of Misconduct (as defined below).

Change in Control” means an occurrence of any of the following events: (a) an acquisition (other than directly from the Company) of any voting securities of the Company (the “Voting Securities”) by any “person or group” (within the meaning of Section 13(d)(3) or 14(d)(2) of the Exchange Act) other than an employee benefit plan of the Company, immediately after which such person or group has “Beneficial Ownership” (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act) of more than fifty percent (50%) of the combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding Voting Securities; or (b) the consummation of (i) a merger, consolidation or reorganization involving the Company, unless either (A) the shareholders of the Company immediately before such merger, consolidation or reorganization own, directly or indirectly immediately following such merger, consolidation or reorganization, at least seventy-five percent (75%) of the combined voting power of the company resulting from such merger, consolidation or reorganization (the “Surviving Company”) in substantially the same proportion as their ownership immediately before such merger, consolidation or reorganization, or (B) at least a majority of the members of the Board of Directors of the Surviving Company were directors of the Company immediately prior to the execution of the agreement providing for such merger, consolidation or reorganization, or (ii) a complete liquidation


or dissolution of the Company. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if an Award is subject to Code Section 409A, the definition of Change in Control shall conform to the requirements of Treasury Regulation § 1.409A-3(i)(5)(i).

Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time.

Committee” means the Compensation and Personnel Committee of the Board, and any successor committee thereto or such other committee of the Board as may be designated by the Board to administer this Plan in whole or in part including any subcommittee of the Board as designated by the Board.

Common Stock” means the Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Company.

Company” means Navient Corporation, a Delaware corporation, or any successor thereto.

Covered Employee” means any Employee who is or may be a “covered employee,” as defined in Code Section 162(m).

Director” means an individual serving as a member of the Board who is not an Employee and an individual who has agreed to become a director of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries and actually becomes such a director following such date of agreement.

Director Award” means the grant of any Award (other than an Incentive Stock Option), whether granted singly, in combination, or in tandem, to a Participant who is a Director pursuant to such applicable terms, conditions, and limitations established by the Outside Board.

Disability” means (1) if the Participant is an Employee, a disability that entitles the Employee to benefits under the Company’s long-term disability plan, as may be in effect from time to time, as determined by the plan administrator of the long-term disability plan or (2) if the Participant is a Director, a disability whereby the Director is unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment that can be expected to result in death or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if an Award is subject to Code Section 409A, the definition of Disability shall conform to the requirements of Treasury Regulation § 1.409A-3(i)(4)(i).

Dividend Equivalents” means, in the case of Restricted Stock Units or Performance Units, an amount equal to all dividends and other distributions (or the economic equivalent thereof) that are payable to shareholders of record during the Restriction Period or performance period, as applicable, on a like number of shares of Common Stock that are subject to the Award.

Employee” means (i) an employee of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, and (ii) an individual who has agreed to become an employee of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries and actually becomes such an employee following such date of agreement.

Employee Award” means the grant of any Award, whether granted singly, in combination, or in tandem, to an Employee pursuant to such applicable terms, conditions, and limitations established by the Committee.

Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended from time to time.

Exercise Price” means the price at which a Participant may exercise his right to receive cash or Common Stock, as applicable, under the terms of an Award.

Fair Market Value” of a share of Common Stock means, as of a particular date, (1) if shares of Common Stock are listed on a national securities exchange, the closing sales price per share of Common Stock on the consolidated transaction reporting system for the principal national securities exchange on which shares of Common Stock are listed on that date, or, if there shall have been no such sale so reported on that date, on the last preceding date on which such a sale was so reported, (2) if the Common Stock is not so listed, the average of the closing bid and asked price on that date, or, if there are no quotations available for such date, on the last preceding date on which such quotations shall be available, as reported by an inter-dealer quotation system, (3) if shares of Common Stock are not publicly traded, the most recent value determined by an independent appraiser appointed by the Committee for such purpose, or (4) if none of the above are applicable, the fair market value of a share of Common Stock as determined in good faith by the Committee.



Good Reason” means, unless otherwise defined in an award agreement, a Participant’s resignation from his or her employment due to (a) a material reduction in the position or responsibilities of the Participant; (b) a reduction in the Participant’s annual base salary or a material reduction in the Participant’s compensation arrangements or benefits (provided that variability in the value of stock-based compensation or in the compensation provided under the Plan (or any similar incentive plan adopted by the Company from time to time) shall not be deemed to cause a material reduction in compensation); or (c) a relocation of the Participant’s primary work location to a distance of more than seventy-five (75) miles from its location as of the date of this amendment and restatement of the Plan without the consent of the Participant, unless such relocation results in the Participant’s primary work location being closer to the Participant’s then primary residence or does not substantially increase the average commuting time of the Participant.

Grant Date” means the date an Award is granted to a Participant pursuant to this Plan.

Incentive Stock Option” means an Option that is intended to comply with the requirements set forth in Code Section 422.

Misconduct” means (a) an act of embezzlement, fraud, dishonesty, nonpayment of any obligation owed to the Company (or a Subsidiary), breach of fiduciary duty or deliberate disregard of Company (or Subsidiary) rules; an unauthorized disclosure of any Company (or Subsidiary) trade secret or confidential information; any conduct constituting unfair competition; inducing any customer of the Company (or a Subsidiary) to breach a contract with the Company (or a Subsidiary) or any principal for whom the Company (or a Subsidiary) acts as agent to terminate such agency relationship; or engaging in any other act or conduct proscribed by the senior human resources officer as Misconduct.

Nonqualified Stock Option” means an Option that is not intended to comply with the requirements set forth in Code Section 422.

Option” means a right to purchase a specified number of shares of Common Stock at a specified Exercise Price, which is either an Incentive Stock Option or a Nonqualified Stock Option.

Outside Board” means the Board, excluding any member of the Board who is also an Employee, or any authorized delegate thereof consisting solely of one or more nonemployee Directors.

Participant” means an Employee or Director to whom an Award has been made under this Plan.

Performance Award” means an Award made pursuant to this Plan to a Participant which is subject to the attainment of one or more Performance Goals.

Performance-Based Equity Award” means a Performance Award other than a Cash Award.

Performance Goal” means one or more standards established by the Committee to determine in whole or in part whether a Performance Award shall be earned.

Performance Unit” means a unit evidencing the right to receive in specified circumstances an amount of cash or one share of Common Stock or equivalent value in cash, the value of which at the time it is settled is determined as a function of the extent to which established performance criteria have been satisfied.

Performance Unit Award” means an Award in the form of Performance Units.

Qualified Performance Awards” has the meaning set forth in Paragraph 8(a)(vii)(B).

Restricted Stock” means a share of Common Stock that is restricted or subject to forfeiture provisions.

Restricted Stock Award” means an Award in the form of Restricted Stock.

Restricted Stock Unit” means a unit evidencing the right to receive in specified circumstances one share of Common Stock or equivalent value in cash that is restricted or subject to forfeiture provisions.

Restricted Stock Unit Award” means an Award in the form of Restricted Stock Units.

Restriction Period” means a period of time beginning as of the date upon which a Restricted Stock Award or Restricted Stock Unit Award is made pursuant to this Plan and ending as of the date upon which such Award is no longer restricted or subject to forfeiture provisions.


Retirement” means a Participant’s termination of employment with the Company (or a Subsidiary) in which the Participant meets the Company’s retirement eligibility requirements under the Company’s retirement eligibility policy in effect as of the Grant Date, which shall be determined by the Company in its sole discretion.

Stock Appreciation Right” or “SAR” means a right to receive a payment, in cash or Common Stock, equal to the excess of the Fair Market Value of a specified number of shares of Common Stock on the date the right is exercised over a specified Exercise Price.

Stock Award” means an Award in the form of shares of Common Stock, including a Restricted Stock Award, and a Restricted Stock Unit Award or Performance Unit Award that may be settled in shares of Common Stock, and excluding Options and SARs.

Stock-Based Award Limitations” has the meaning set forth in Paragraph 5.

Subsidiary” means (1) in the case of a corporation, any corporation of which the Company directly or indirectly owns shares representing 50% or more of the combined voting power of the shares of all classes or series of capital stock of such corporation which have the right to vote generally on matters submitted to a vote of the shareholders of such corporation, and (2) in the case of a partnership or other business entity not organized as a corporation, any such business entity of which the Company directly or indirectly owns 50% or more of the voting, capital or profits interests (whether in the form of partnership interests, membership interests or otherwise).

Time-Based Equity Award” means any Stock Award, Option or SAR, other than a Performance Award.

4.Eligibility

(a)       Employees. All Employees are eligible for Employee Awards under this Plan,provided, however, that if the Committee makes an Employee Award to an individual whom it expects to become an Employee following the Grant Date of such Award, such Award shall be subject to (among other terms and conditions) the individual actually becoming an Employee.

(b)       Directors. All Directors are eligible for Director Awards under this Plan,provided, however, that if the Outside Board makes a Director Award to an individual whom it expects to become a Director following the Grant Date of such Award, such Award shall be subject to (among other terms and conditions) the individual actually becoming a Director.

The Committee (or the Outside Board, in the case of Director Awards) shall determine the type or types of Awards to be made under this Plan and shall designate from time to time the Employees or Directors who are to be granted Awards under this Plan.

5.Common Stock Available for Awards

Subject to the provisions of Paragraph 15 hereof, there shall be available for Awards under this Plan granted wholly or partly in Common Stock (including rights or Options that may be exercised for or settled in Common Stock) an aggregate of 55,000,000 shares (the “Maximum Share Limit”), consisting of (i) 10,000,000 shares of Common Stock newly authorized for issuance and subject to approval of the Company’s shareholders at the Company’s 2017 annual meeting, and (ii) 45,000,000 shares of Common Stock previously authorized for issuance. All of the shares of Common Stock authorized for issuance under the Plan shall be available for Incentive Stock Options. Each Stock Award granted under this Plan shall be counted against the Maximum Share Limit as one share of Common Stock; each Option and SAR shall be counted against the Maximum Share Limit as one share of Common Stock.

Awards settled in cash shall not reduce the Maximum Share Limit under the Plan. If an Award expires or is terminated, cancelled or forfeited, the shares of Common Stock associated with the expired, terminated, cancelled or forfeited Awards shall again be available for Awards under the Plan, and the Maximum Share Limit shall be increased by the same amount as such shares were counted against the Maximum Share Limit (i.e., increased by one share of Common Stock, if a Stock Award, and one share of Common Stock, if an Option or SAR). The following shares of Common Stock shall not become available again for issuance under the Plan:

(a)        Shares of Common Stock that have been retained or withheld by the Company in payment or satisfaction of the Exercise Price, purchase price or tax withholding obligation of an Award;


(b)        Shares of Common Stock that have been delivered (either actually or by attestation) to the Company in payment or satisfaction of the Exercise Price, purchase price or tax withholding obligation of an Award;

(c)        Shares of Common Stock tendered or withheld in payment of an Option; and;

(d)        Shares repurchased by the Company with Option proceeds.

In addition, shares of Common Stock covered by a SAR, to the extent the SAR is exercised and settled in shares of Common Stock, and whether or not shares of Common Stock are actually issued to the Participant upon exercise of the SAR, shall be considered issued or transferred pursuant to the Plan.

The Board and the appropriate officers of the Company shall from time to time take whatever actions are necessary to file any required documents with governmental authorities, stock exchanges and transaction reporting systems to ensure that shares of Common Stock are available for issuance pursuant to Awards.

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Plan, the following limitations shall apply to any Awards made hereunder:

(a)        No Employee may be granted during any calendar year Awards exercisable, covering or relating to more than 2,500,000 shares of Common Stock (the “Stock-Based Award Limitation”); and

(b)        No Employee may be granted during any calendar year (1) Cash Awards or (2) Restricted Stock Unit Awards or Performance Unit Awards that may be settled solely in cash, having a value determined on the Grant Date in excess of $5,000,000.

6.Administration

(a)       Authority of the Committee. Except as otherwise provided in this Plan with respect to actions or determinations by the Board, this Plan shall be administered by the Committee;provided, however, that (i) any and all members of the Committee shall satisfy any independence requirements prescribed by any stock exchange on which the Company lists its Common Stock; (ii) Awards may be granted to individuals who are subject to Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act only if the Committee is comprised solely of two or more “Non-Employee Directors” as defined in Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 16b-3 (as amended from time to time, and any successor rule, regulation or statute fulfilling the same or similar function); and (iii) any Award intended to qualify for the “performance-based compensation” exception under Code Section 162(m) shall be granted only if the Committee is comprised solely of two or more “outside directors” within the meaning of Code Section 162(m) and regulations pursuant thereto. Subject to the provisions hereof, the Committee shall have full and exclusive power and authority to administer this Plan and to take all actions that are specifically contemplated hereby or are necessary or appropriate in connection with the administration hereof. The Committee shall also have full and exclusive power to interpret this Plan and to adopt such rules, regulations and guidelines for carrying out this Plan as it may deem necessary or proper, all of which powers shall be exercised in the best interests of the Company and in keeping with the objectives of this Plan. Subject to Paragraph 6(c) hereof, the Committee may, in its discretion, (x) provide for the extension of the exercisability of an Award;provided, however, that no such action shall permit the term of any Option to be greater than 10 years from its Grant Date; (y) in the event of death or Disability, accelerate the vesting or exercisability of an Award, eliminate or make less restrictive any restrictions contained in an Award, waive any restriction or other provision of this Plan or an Award or otherwise amend or modify an Award in any manner that is, in either case, (1) not adverse to the Participant to whom such Award was granted, or (2) consented to by such Participant; or (z) in the event of a Change in Control, take any action authorized by Paragraph 16 hereof. The Committee may correct any defect or supply any omission or reconcile any inconsistency in this Plan or in any Award Agreement in the manner and to the extent the Committee deems necessary or desirable to further this Plan’s purposes. Any decision of the Committee in the interpretation and administration of this Plan shall lie within its sole and absolute discretion and shall be final, conclusive and binding on all parties concerned. The Outside Board shall have the same powers as the Committee with respect to Director Awards.

(b)        Indemnity. No member of the Board or the Committee or officer of the Company to whom the Committee has delegated authority in accordance with the provisions of Paragraph 7 of this Plan shall be liable for anything done or omitted to be done by him, by any member of the Board or the Committee or by any officer of the Company in connection with the performance of any duties under this Plan, except for his own willful misconduct or as expressly provided by statute.


(c)       Prohibition on Repricing of Awards. Subject to the provisions of Paragraph 15 hereof, the terms of outstanding Award Agreements may not be amended without the approval of the Company’s shareholders so as to (i) reduce the Exercise Price of any outstanding Options or SARs or (ii) cancel any outstanding Options or SARs in exchange for cash or other Awards, or Options or SARs with an Exercise Price that is less than the Exercise Price of the original Options or SARs.

(d)       Minimum Vesting Period.Each Stock Award, Option and SAR shall have a minimum vesting period of one year from the date of grant. The foregoing notwithstanding, 5% of the total number of shares of Common Stock available for issuance under this Plan shall not be subject to the minimum vesting requirement described in the preceding sentence.

7.Delegation of Authority

The Committee may delegate any of its authority to grant Awards to Employees who are not subject to Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act, subject to Paragraph 6(a) above, to the Board or to any other committee of the Board, provided such delegation is made in writing and specifically sets forth such delegated authority. The Committee may also delegate to an Authorized Officer authority to execute on behalf of the Company any Award Agreement. The Committee and the Board, as applicable, may engage or authorize the engagement of a third party administrator to carry out administrative functions under this Plan. Any such delegation hereunder shall only be made to the extent permitted by applicable law.

8.Employee Awards

(a)        The Committee shall determine the type or types of Employee Awards to be made under this Plan and shall designate from time to time the Employees who are to be the recipients of such Awards. Each Award shall be embodied in an Award Agreement, which shall contain such terms, conditions and limitations as shall be determined by the Committee, in its sole discretion, and, if required by the Committee, shall be signed by the Participant to whom the Award is granted and by an Authorized Officer for and on behalf of the Company. Awards may consist of those listed in this Paragraph 8(a) hereof and may be granted singly, in combination or in tandem. Awards may also be made in combination or in tandem with, in replacement of, or as alternatives to, grants or rights under this Plan or any other plan of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, including the plan of any acquired entity;provided, however, that, except as contemplated in Paragraph 15 hereof, no Option or SAR may be issued in exchange for the cancellation of an Option or SAR with a higher Exercise Price nor may the Exercise Price of any Option or SAR be reduced. All or part of an Award may be subject to conditions established by the Committee. Upon the termination of employment by a Participant who is an Employee, any unexercised, unvested or unpaid Awards shall be treated as set forth in the applicable Award Agreement or in any other written agreement the Company has entered into with the Participant.

(i)       Options. An Employee Award may be in the form of an Option. An Option awarded pursuant to this Plan may consist of either an Incentive Stock Option or a Nonqualified Stock Option. The price at which shares of Common Stock may be purchased upon the exercise of an Option shall be not less than the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock on the Grant Date. The term of an Option shall not exceed 10 years from the Grant Date. Options may not include provisions that “reload” the Option upon exercise. Subject to the foregoing provisions, including the minimum vesting requirement described in this Paragraph 8(a), the terms, conditions and limitations applicable to any Option, including, but not limited to, the term of any Option and the date or dates upon which the Option becomes vested and exercisable, shall be determined by the Committee.

(ii)       Stock Appreciation Rights. An Employee Award may be in the form of an SAR. The Exercise Price for an SAR shall not be less than the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock on the Grant Date. The holder of a tandem SAR may elect to exercise either the Option or the SAR, but not both. The exercise period for an SAR shall extend no more than 10 years after the Grant Date. SARs may not include provisions that “reload” the SAR upon exercise. Subject to the foregoing provisions, including the minimum vesting requirement described in this Paragraph 8(a), the terms, conditions, and limitations applicable to any SAR, including, but not limited to, the term of any SAR and the date or dates upon which the SAR becomes vested and exercisable, shall be determined by the Committee.


(iii)       Stock Awards. An Employee Award may be in the form of a Stock Award. The terms, conditions and limitations applicable to any Stock Award, including, but not limited to, vesting or other restrictions, shall be determined by the Committee, and subject to the minimum Restriction Period and performance period requirements and any other applicable requirements described in this Paragraph 8(a).

(iv)       Restricted Stock Unit Awards. An Employee Award may be in the form of a Restricted Stock Unit Award. The terms, conditions and limitations applicable to a Restricted Stock Unit Award, including, but not limited to, the Restriction Period and the right to receive Dividend Equivalents, if any, shall be determined by the Committee. Subject to the terms of this Plan, the Committee, in its sole discretion, may settle Restricted Stock Units in the form of cash or in shares of Common Stock (or in a combination thereof) equal to the value of the vested Restricted Stock Units.

(v)       Performance Unit Awards. An Employee Award may be in the form of a Performance Unit Award. Each Performance Unit shall have an initial value that is established by the Committee on the Grant Date. Subject to the terms of this Plan, after the applicable performance period has ended, the Participant shall be entitled to receive settlement of the value and number of Performance Units earned by the Participant over the performance period, to be determined as a function of the extent to which the corresponding performance goals have been achieved. Settlement of earned Performance Units shall be as determined by the Committee and as evidenced in an Award Agreement. Subject to the terms of this Plan, the Committee, in its sole discretion, may settle earned Performance Units in the form of cash or in shares of Common Stock (or in a combination thereof) equal to the value of the earned Performance Units as soon as practicable after the end of the performance period and following the Committee’s determination of actual performance against the performance measures and related goals established by the Committee. The terms, conditions and limitations applicable to a Performance Unit Award, including, but not limited to, the Restriction Period and the right to Dividend Equivalents, if any, shall be determined by the Committee.

(vi)       Cash Awards. An Employee Award may be in the form of a Cash Award. The terms, conditions and limitations applicable to a Cash Award, including, but not limited to, vesting or other restrictions, shall be determined by the Committee.

(b)        Performance Awards. Without limiting the type or number of Awards that may be made under the other provisions of this Plan, any Employee Award granted under this Plan may be structured as a Performance Award. The terms, conditions and limitations applicable to an Award that is a Performance Award shall be determined by the Committee. The Committee shall set Performance Goals in its discretion which, depending on the extent to which they are met, will determine the value and/or amount of Performance Awards that will be paid out to the Participant and/or the portion of an Award that may be exercised.

(i)        Nonqualified Performance Awards. Performance Awards granted to Employees that are not intended to qualify as qualified performance-based compensation under Code Section 162(m) shall be based on achievement of such Performance Goals and be subject to such terms, conditions and restrictions as the Committee or its delegate shall determine.

(ii)        Qualified Performance Awards. Performance Awards granted to Employees under this Plan that are intended to qualify as qualified performance-based compensation under Code Section 162(m) shall be paid, vested or otherwise deliverable solely on account of the attainment of one or more pre-established, objective Performance Goals established by the Committee prior to the earlier to occur of (1) 90 days after the commencement of the period of service to which the Performance Goal relates and (2) the lapse of 25% of the period of service (as scheduled in good faith at the time the goal is established), and in any event while the outcome is substantially uncertain. A Performance Goal is objective if a third party having knowledge of the relevant facts could determine whether the goal is met. One or more of such goals may apply to the Employee, one or more business units, divisions or sectors of the Company, or the Company as a whole, and if so desired by the Committee, by comparison with a peer group of companies. A Performance Goal shall include one or more of the following: (a) cash flow (including operating cash flow, free cash flow, cash flow return on capital, or cash flow per share), (b) core earnings per share (including earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization), (c) return measures (including return on assets, capital, equity, or sales), (d) total shareholder return, (e) productivity ratios, (f) expense targets or ratios, (g) revenue, (h) core income or net income, (i) core operating income or net operating income, (j) operating profit or net operating profit, (k) gross or operating margin, (l) return on operating revenue, (m)


market share, (n) loan volume, (o) loan delinquencies, (p) loan defaults, (q) loan credit indicators (including FICO, co-borrower, payments made, GPA and graduation), (r) overhead or other expense reduction, (s) charge-off levels, (t) deposit growth, (u) margins, (v) operating efficiency, (w) economic value added, (x) customer or employee satisfaction, (y) debt reduction, (z) capital targets, (aa) consummation of acquisitions, dispositions, projects or other specific events or transactions, (bb) liquidity, (cc) capital adequacy, (dd) ratio of nonperforming to performing assets, (ee) ratio of common equity to total assets, or (ff) regulatory compliance metrics.

Unless otherwise stated, such a Performance Goal need not be based upon an increase or positive result under a particular business criterion and could include, for example, maintaining the status quo or limiting economic losses (measured, in each case, by reference to specific business criteria). In interpreting Plan provisions applicable to Qualified Performance Awards, it is the intent of this Plan to conform with the standards of Code Section 162(m) and Treasury Regulation § 1.162-27(e)(2)(i), as to grants to Covered Employees and the Committee in establishing such goals and interpreting this Plan shall be guided by such provisions. Prior to the payment of any compensation based on the achievement of Performance Goals applicable to Qualified Performance Awards, the Committee must certify in writing that applicable Performance Goals and any of the material terms thereof were, in fact, satisfied. For this purpose, approved minutes of the Committee meeting in which the certification is made shall be treated as such written certification. Subject to the foregoing provisions, the terms, conditions and limitations applicable to any Qualified Performance Awards made pursuant to this Plan shall be determined by the Committee. The Committee may provide in any such Performance Award that any evaluation of performance may include or exclude certain events that occur during a Performance Period including but not limited to: (i) amortization, depreciation or impairment of tangible or intangible assets, (ii) litigation or claim judgments or settlements, (iii) the effect of changes in tax law, accounting principles or other laws or provisions affecting reported results, (iv) accruals for reorganization and restructuring programs or reductions in force or early retirement programs, (v) any unusual or infrequently occurring items that may be defined in an objective and non-discretionary manner under or by reference to U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, accounting standards or other applicable accounting standards in effect from time to time and/ or in management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations appearing in the Company’s annual report to shareholders for the applicable year, (vi) the sale of investments or non-core assets; (vii) discontinued operations, categories or segments; (viii) investments, acquisitions or dispositions; (ix) political, legal and other business interruptions (such as due to war, insurrection, riot, terrorism, confiscation, expropriation, nationalization, deprivation, seizure, and regulatory requirements); (x) natural catastrophes; (xi) currency fluctuations; (xii) stock based compensation expense; (xiii) early retirement of debt; (xiv) conversion of convertible debt securities; and (xv) termination of real estate leases.

(iii)        Adjustment of Performance Awards. Awards that are intended to qualify as Performance Awards may not be adjusted upward. The Committee may retain the discretion to adjust such Performance Awards downward, either on a formula or discretionary basis or any combination, as the Committee determines.

9.Director Awards

The Outside Board has the sole authority to grant Director Awards from time to time in accordance with this Paragraph 9. Director Awards may consist of the forms of Award described in Paragraph 8, with the exception of Incentive Stock Options, may be granted singly, in combination, or in tandem and shall be granted subject to such terms and conditions as specified in Paragraph 8. Each Director Award may, in the discretion of the Outside Board, be embodied in an Award Agreement, which shall contain such terms, conditions, and limitations as shall be determined by the Outside Board, in its sole discretion. The maximum aggregate grant-date value of all Director Awards granted to any single Director during any single calendar year shall be $650,000.

10.Award Payment; Dividends and Dividend Equivalents

(a)       General. Payment of Awards may be made in the form of cash or Common Stock, or a combination thereof, and may include such restrictions as the Committee (or the Outside Board, in the case of Director Awards) shall determine, including, but not limited to, in the case of Common Stock, restrictions on transfer and forfeiture provisions. For a Restricted Stock Award, the certificates evidencing the shares of such Restricted Stock (to the extent that such shares are so evidenced) shall contain appropriate legends and restrictions that describe the terms


and conditions of the restrictions applicable thereto. For a Restricted Stock Unit Award that may be settled in shares of Common Stock, the shares of Common Stock that may be issued at the end of the Restriction Period shall be evidenced by book entry registration or in such other manner as the Committee may determine.

(b)       Dividends and Dividend Equivalents. Dividends and/or Dividend Equivalents shall not be made part of any Options or SARs. Rights to (1) dividends will be extended to and made part of any Restricted Stock Award and (2) Dividend Equivalents may be extended to and made part of any Restricted Stock Unit Award and Performance Unit Award, subject in each case to such terms, conditions and restrictions as the Committee may establish;provided, however, that any such dividends or Dividend Equivalents paid with respect to unvested Stock Awards, including Stock Awards subject to Performance Goals shall be subject to the same restrictions and/or Performance Goals as applicable, as the underlying Stock Award.

11.Option Exercise

The Exercise Price shall be paid in full at the time of exercise in cash or, if permitted by the Committee and elected by the Participant, the Participant may purchase such shares by means of the Company withholding shares of Common Stock otherwise deliverable on exercise of the Award or tendering Common Stock valued at Fair Market Value on the date of exercise, or any combination thereof. The Committee, in its sole discretion, shall determine acceptable methods for Participants to tender Common Stock or other Awards. The Committee may provide for procedures to permit the exercise or purchase of such Awards by use of the proceeds to be received from the sale of Common Stock issuable pursuant to an Award (including cashless exercise procedures approved by the Committee involving a broker or dealer approved by the Committee). The Committee may adopt additional rules and procedures regarding the exercise of Options from time to time, provided that such rules and procedures are not inconsistent with the provisions of this Paragraph 11.

12.Taxes

The Company shall have the right to deduct applicable taxes from any Award payment and withhold, at the time of delivery or vesting of cash or shares of Common Stock under this Plan, an appropriate amount of cash or number of shares of Common Stock or a combination thereof for payment of required withholding taxes or to take such other action as may be necessary in the opinion of the Company to satisfy all obligations for withholding of such taxes;provided, however,that the number of shares of Common Stock withheld for payment of required withholding taxes must equal no more than the maximum individual statutory rate in the applicable jurisdiction, as determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Committee may also permit withholding to be satisfied by the transfer to the Company of shares of Common Stock theretofore owned by the holder of the Award with respect to which withholding is required. If shares of Common Stock are used to satisfy tax withholding, such shares shall be valued based on the Fair Market Value when the tax withholding is required to be made.

13.Amendment, Modification, Suspension or Termination

The Board may amend, modify, suspend or terminate this Plan (and the Committee may amend an Award Agreement) for the purpose of meeting or addressing any changes in legal requirements or for any other purpose permitted by law, except that (1) no amendment or alteration that would adversely affect the rights of any Participant under any Award previously granted to such Participant shall be made without the consent of such Participant and (2) no amendment or alteration shall be effective prior to its approval by the shareholders of the Company to the extent shareholder approval is otherwise required by applicable legal requirements or the requirements of the securities exchange on which the Company’s stock is listed, including any amendment that expands the types of Awards available under this Plan, materially increases the number of shares of Common Stock available for Awards under this Plan, materially expands the classes of persons eligible for Awards under this Plan, materially extends the term of this Plan, materially changes the method of determining the Exercise Price of Options, deletes or limits any provisions of this Plan that prohibit the repricing of Options or SARs, or decreases any minimum vesting requirements for any Stock Award.

14.Assignability

Unless otherwise determined by the Committee (or the Outside Board in the case of Director Awards) and expressly provided for in an Award Agreement, no Award or any other benefit under this Plan shall be assignable or otherwise transferable except (1) by will or the laws of descent and distribution or (2) pursuant to a domestic relations order issued by a court of competent jurisdiction that is not contrary to the terms and conditions of this Plan or applicable Award and in a form acceptable to the Committee. The Committee may prescribe and include in applicable Award Agreements other restrictions on transfer. Any attempted assignment of an Award or any other benefit under this Plan in violation of this Paragraph 14 shall be null and void. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Award may be transferred for value or consideration.


15.Adjustments

(a)        The existence of outstanding Awards shall not affect in any manner the right or power of the Company or its shareholders to make or authorize any or all adjustments, recapitalizations, reorganizations or other changes in the capital stock of the Company or its business or any merger or consolidation of the Company, or any issue of bonds, debentures, preferred or prior preference stock (whether or not such issue is prior to, on a parity with or junior to the Common Stock) or the dissolution or liquidation of the Company, or any sale or transfer of all or any part of its assets or business, or any other corporate act or proceeding of any kind, whether or not of a character similar to that of the acts or proceedings enumerated above.

(b)        In the event of any subdivision or consolidation of outstanding shares of Common Stock, declaration of a dividend payable in shares of Common Stock or other stock split, then (1) the number of shares of Common Stock reserved under this Plan, (2) the number of shares of Common Stock covered by outstanding Awards in the form of Common Stock or units denominated in Common Stock, (3) the Exercise Price or other price in respect of such Awards, (4) the Stock-Based Award Limitations, and (5) the appropriate Fair Market Value and other price determinations for such Awards shall each be proportionately adjusted by the Committee as appropriate to reflect such transaction. In the event of any other recapitalization or capital reorganization of the Company, any consolidation or merger of the Company with another corporation or entity, the adoption by the Company of any plan of exchange affecting the Common Stock or any distribution to holders of Common Stock of securities or property (other than normal cash dividends or dividends payable in Common Stock), the Committee shall make appropriate adjustments to (i) the number and kind of shares of Common Stock covered by Awards in the form of Common Stock or units denominated in Common Stock, (ii) the Exercise Price or other price in respect of such Awards, (iii) the appropriate Fair Market Value and other price determinations for such Awards, and (iv) the Stock-Based Award Limitations to reflect such transaction; provided that such adjustments shall only be such as are necessary to maintain the proportionate interest of the holders of the Awards and preserve, without increasing, the value of such Awards.

(c)        In the event of a corporate merger, consolidation, acquisition of property or stock, separation, reorganization or liquidation, the Committee may make such adjustments to Awards or other provisions for the disposition of Awards as it deems equitable, and shall be authorized, in its discretion, (1) to provide for the substitution of a new Award or other arrangement (which, if applicable, may be exercisable for such property or stock as the Committee determines) for an Award or the assumption of the Award, regardless of whether in a transaction to which Code Section 424(a) applies, (2) to provide, prior to the transaction, for the acceleration of the vesting and exercisability of, or lapse of restrictions with respect to, the Award and, if the transaction is a cash merger, provide for the termination of any portion of the Award that remains unexercised at the time of such transaction, or (3) to cancel any such Awards and to deliver to the Participants cash in an amount that the Committee shall determine in its sole discretion is equal to the fair market value of such Awards on the date of such event, which in the case of Options or Stock Appreciation Rights shall be the excess of the Fair Market Value of Common Stock on such date over the Exercise Price of such Award.

(d)        Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in Paragraph 15(c), the vesting of any Stock Awards, Options or SARs shall be accelerated upon an event described in Paragraph 15(c) only if the awards are not assumed by or substituted for awards of the surviving or acquiring entity, and the acceleration of vesting of any Performance-Based Equity Awards upon such event shall be adjusted for actual performance and/or the fractional performance period through the date of the event.

(e)        No adjustment or acceleration pursuant to this Paragraph 15 shall be made in a manner that results in noncompliance with the requirements of Code Section 409A, to the extent applicable. For purposes of Code Section 409A, the immediate settlement of Awards whose vesting has been accelerated pursuant to the provisions hereof or of Paragraph 16 below shall, to the extent required in order to comply with Code Section 409A, conform to the requirements for a termination and liquidation of the Plan and all outstanding Awards under the Plan that are subject to Code Section 409A in accordance with Treasury Regulation § 1.409A-3(j)(4)(ix)(B).


16.        Change of Control.Notwithstanding anything in Paragraph 15 to the contrary, the provisions of this Paragraph 16 shall apply to an outstanding Award if a Change in Control occurs.

(a)        If a Change in Control triggered by clause (b) of the definition thereof occurs and outstanding Awards are not assumed or continued by the acquiring or surviving entity in the transaction, then upon consummation of the Change in Control: (1) if an Award is a Time-Based Equity Award, it shall vest fully and completely, any and all restrictions shall lapse, and (if an Option or SAR) it shall be fully exercisable; or (2) if an Award is a Performance-Based Equity Award, it shall vest based on the performance terms of the Award and based on actual performance achieved to the date of the Change in Control. The Committee may adjust the performance goals of a Performance Award in its good faith discretion to account for the shortened performance period.

(b)        If a Change in Control triggered by clause (a) of the definition thereof occurs, or if the acquiring or surviving entity in a Change in Control triggered by clause (b) of the definition thereof assumes or continues the Award, then no acceleration of vesting, exercisability and/or payment of an outstanding Award shall occur in connection with the Change in Control; provided, however, that individual Awards may provide for acceleration if the Participant’s employment with the Company (or any Subsidiary), or with any acquiring or surviving entity in the transaction (as the case may be), terminates in connection with the Change in Control due to a qualifying termination of employment under the circumstances provided in the Award, including (by way of example and not of limitation) any termination of employment other than either (x) involuntary termination by the Company, Subsidiary, or acquiring or surviving entity for Cause, or (y) voluntary termination by the Participant other than due to Retirement or Good Reason.

17.Restrictions

No Common Stock or other form of payment shall be issued with respect to any Award unless the Company shall be satisfied based on the advice of its counsel that such issuance will be in compliance with applicable federal and state securities laws. Certificates evidencing shares of Common Stock delivered under this Plan (to the extent that such shares are so evidenced) may be subject to such stop transfer orders and other restrictions as the Committee may deem advisable under the rules, regulations and other requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, any securities exchange or transaction reporting system upon which the Common Stock is then listed or to which it is admitted for quotation and any applicable federal or state securities law. The Committee may cause a legend or legends to be placed upon such certificates (if any) to make appropriate reference to such restrictions.

18.Unfunded Plan

This Plan is unfunded. Although bookkeeping accounts may be established with respect to Participants who are entitled to cash, Common Stock or rights thereto under this Plan, any such accounts shall be used merely as a bookkeeping convenience. The Company shall not be required to segregate any assets that may at any time be represented by cash, Common Stock or rights thereto, nor shall this Plan be construed as providing for such segregation, nor shall the Company, the Board or the Committee be deemed to be a trustee of any cash, Common Stock or rights thereto to be granted under this Plan. Any liability or obligation of the Company to any Participant with respect to an Award of cash, Common Stock or rights thereto under this Plan shall be based solely upon any contractual obligations that may be created by this Plan and any Award Agreement, and no such liability or obligation of the Company shall be deemed to be secured by any pledge or other encumbrance on any property of the Company. None of the Company, the Board or the Committee shall be required to give any security or bond for the performance of any obligation that may be created by this Plan. With respect to this Plan and any Awards granted hereunder, Participants are general and unsecured creditors of the Company and have no rights or claims except as otherwise provided in this Plan or any applicable Award Agreement.

19.Code Section 409A

(a)        Awards made under this Plan are intended to comply with or be exempt from Code Section 409A, and ambiguous provisions hereof, if any, shall be construed and interpreted in a manner consistent with such intent. No payment, benefit or consideration shall be substituted for an Award if such action would result in the imposition of taxes under Code Section 409A. Notwithstanding anything in this Plan to the contrary, if any Plan provision or Award under this Plan would result in the imposition of an additional tax under Code Section 409A, that Plan provision or Award shall be reformed, to the extent permissible under Code Section 409A, to avoid imposition of the additional tax, and no such action shall be deemed to adversely affect the Participant’s rights to an Award.


(b)        Unless the Committee provides otherwise in an Award Agreement, each Restricted Stock Unit Award, Performance Unit Award or Cash Award (or portion thereof if the Award is subject to a vesting schedule) shall be settled no later than the 15th day of the third month after the end of the first calendar year in which the Award (or such portion thereof) is no longer subject to a “substantial risk of forfeiture” within the meaning of Code Section 409A. If the Committee determines that a Restricted Stock Unit Award, Performance Unit Award or Cash Award is intended to be subject to Code Section 409A, the applicable Award Agreement shall include terms that are designed to satisfy the requirements of Code Section 409A.

(c)        If the Participant is identified by the Company as a “specified employee” within the meaning of Code Section 409A(a)(2)(B)(i) on the date on which the Participant has a “separation from service” (other than due to death) within the meaning of Treasury Regulation § 1.409A-1(h), any Award payable or settled on account of a separation from service that is deferred compensation subject to Code Section 409A shall be paid or settled on the earliest of (1) the first business day following the expiration of six months from the Participant’s separation from service, (2) the date of the Participant’s death, or (3) such earlier date as complies with the requirements of Code Section 409A.

20.Awards to Foreign Nationals and Employees Outside the United States

The Committee may, without amending this Plan, (1) establish special rules applicable to Awards granted to Participants who are foreign nationals, are employed or otherwise providing services outside the United States, or both, including rules that differ from those set forth in this Plan, and (2) grant Awards to such Participants in accordance with those rules.

21.Governing Law

This Plan and all determinations made and actions taken pursuant hereto, to the extent not otherwise governed by mandatory provisions of the Code or the securities laws of the United States, shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware.

22.Right to Continued Service or Employment

Nothing in this Plan or an Award Agreement shall interfere with or limit in any way the right of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries to terminate any Participant’s employment or other service relationship with the Company or its Subsidiaries at any time, nor confer upon any Participant any right to continue in the capacity in which he is employed or otherwise serves the Company or its Subsidiaries.

23.Usage

Words used in this Plan in the singular shall include the plural and in the plural the singular, and the gender of words used shall be construed to include whichever may be appropriate under any particular circumstances of the masculine, feminine or neuter genders.

24.Headings

The headings in this Plan are inserted for convenience of reference only and shall not affect the meaning or interpretation of this Plan.

25.Effectiveness

This Plan, as approved by the Board on April 7, 2014, became effective as of the Effective Date. This Plan shall continue in effect for a term of 10 years commencing on the Effective Date, unless earlier terminated by action of the Board.

The then sole shareholder of the Company approved this Plan on April 8, 2014. The Company amended and restated the Plan on April 6, 2015, and again on April 4, 2017.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Navient Corporation has caused this Plan to be executed by its duly authorized officer, effective as provided herein.

NAVIENT CORPORATION
By:
Name: Mark L. Heleen
Title: Secretary

 (NAVIENT LOGO)

NAVIENT CORPORATION
ATTN: CORPORATE SECRETARY
123 JUSTISON STREET
WILMINGTON, DE 19801

VOTE BY INTERNET -www.proxyvote.com

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS

If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.

VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

VOTE BY MAIL

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.


TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:

E17962-P86726 

KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

NAVIENT CORPORATION

The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposals:
1.Election of Directors
Nominees:ForAgainstAbstain
1a.John K. Adams, Jr.
1b.Anna Escobedo Cabral
1c.William M. Diefenderfer, III
1d.Diane Suitt Gilleland
1e.Katherine A. Lehman
1f.Linda A. Mills
1g.John F. Remondi
1h.Jane J. Thompson
1i.Laura S. Unger
1j.Barry L. Williams
1k.David L. Yowan
ForAgainstAbstain
2.Ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2017.
3.Non-binding advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation.
4.

Approval of the Amended and Restated Navient Corporation 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan. 


NOTE: The shares represented by this proxy when properly executed will be voted in the manner directed herein. If any other matters properly come before the meeting, the person named in this proxy will vote in their discretion.

For address changes and/or comments, please check this box and write them on the back where indicated.

Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting. 

YesNo

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.

Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]Date

Signature (Joint Owners)

Date

V.1.1

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:

The Notice and Proxy Statement and Form 10-K are available at www.proxyvote.com.

PLEASE VOTE, SIGN AND DATE THIS PROXY CARD ON THE REVERSE SIDE AND RETURN PROMPTLY

IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.

ADMISSION TICKET

Bring this ticket and photo ID with you if you plan on attending the meeting.

NOTE: Cameras, transmission, broadcasting and other recording devices, including smart phones, will not be permitted in the meeting room. Attendees may be asked to pass through a security screening device or adhere to other security measures prior to entering the Annual Meeting. We regret any inconvenience this may cause you and we appreciate your cooperation.

IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION,

▼     DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.     ▼

E17963-P86726

NAVIENT CORPORATION
Annual Meeting of Shareholders
May 25, 2017 8:00 AM

Navient Corporation
123 Justison Street
Wilmington, DE 19801

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The undersigned hereby appoints Mark Heleen and Kurt Slawson, or each of them, each with full power of substitution, as the lawful attorneys and proxies of the undersigned to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Navient Corporation to be held on May 25, 2017, and any adjournments or postponements thereof, to vote the number of shares the undersigned would be entitled to vote if personally present, and to vote in their discretion upon any other business that may properly come before the meeting.

THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED AS SPECIFIED BY THE UNDERSIGNED SHAREHOLDER. IF NO CHOICE IS SPECIFIED BY THE SHAREHOLDER, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED “FOR” ALL PORTIONS OF PROPOSALS 1, 2, 3 AND 4, AND IN THE PROXY’S DISCRETION ON ANY OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY COMING BEFORE THE MEETING.

THIS CARD WILL ALSO BE USED TO PROVIDE VOTING INSTRUCTIONS TO THE TRUSTEE FOR ANY SHARES HELD FOR THE ACCOUNT OF THE UNDERSIGNED IN THE NAVIENT 401(K) SAVINGS PLAN.

Address Changes/Comments:

(If you noted any Address Changes/Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.)

V.1.1